• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

USAF X-51A Waverider scramjet sets new record, flies at Mach 5 for 3 minutes

Status
Not open for further replies.

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
Scramjet sets hypersonic flight record. Mach 5 is just under 3400 mph (at the altitude of the flight).

For those unfamiliar with the Waverider, it uses its own sonic booms for lift, allowing the craft's design to eliminate the need for wings to reduce drag.

Air Force's X-51 Scramjet Sets Record for Longest Hypersonic Flight
By Tariq Malik
SPACE.com Managing Editor
posted: 27 May 2010
10:22 am ET

An experimental aircraft has set a new record for the longest hypersonic flight after streaking across the sky Wednesday for more than three minutes while flying at Mach 5 – five times the speed of sound — the United States Air Force has announced.

The vehicle, called the X-51A Waverider, dropped from a B-52 Stratofortress mother ship while flying over the Pacific Ocean just off the southern California coast. It successfully ignited an air-breathing scramjet engine than accelerated up to Mach 5, Air Force officials said in the announcement.

The entire test flight lasted just over 200 seconds, more than 10 times longer than the previous hypersonic record (just 12 seconds) set by NASA's X-43 vehicle in 2004.

"We are ecstatic to have accomplished most of our test points on the X-51A's very first hypersonic mission," said X-51A program manager Charlie Brink of the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio, in a statement. "We equate this leap in engine technology as equivalent to the post-World War II jump from propeller-driven aircraft to jet engines."

X-51A's new record

Wednesday's test flight was aimed at evaluating the X-51A's scramjet engine, thermal protection, stability and control, and other systems.

With a profile that gives it a shark-like look, the X-51A scramjet cruiser is 14 feet (4.2 meters) long and is virtually wingless. It is designed to ride the shockwave it creates during flight, leading to its nickname "Waverider," the Air Force has said.


Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne built the SJY61 scramjet engine at the heart of the X-51A cruiser.

The Air Force began Wednesday's test at 1 p.m. EDT (1700 GMT), when the B-52 Stratofortress hauling the X-51A took off from Edwards Air Force Base in California. The X-51A test craft dropped from its mother ship while flying 50,000 feet (15,240 meters) over the Point Mugu Naval Air Warfare Center Sea Range on the Pacific Ocean.

Four seconds into the flight, the X-51A's solid rocket booster – actually an adapted Army Tactical Missile booster – accelerated the experimental aircraft to Mach 4.8 before being jettisoned to let the scramjet engine take over.

After the flight, the vehicle was expected to splash into the ocean. There were no plans to recover the craft, according to the Air Force.


"Now we will go back and really scrutinize our data. No test is perfect, and I'm sure we will find anomalies that we will need to address before the next flight," Brink said. "But anyone will tell you that we learn just as much, if not more, when we encounter a glitch."

The test was actually the third flight of the X-51 vehicle; it was the first time it flew independently. It had remained attached to its mother ship on both earlier flights.

Three more X-51 hypersonic tests flights are scheduled for later this year. The Air Force has built four X-51A cruisers in all, with one of them now successfully flown.

The project is a joint effort by the Air Force Research Laboratory, industry teams and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).


Going hypersonic

Hypersonic flight, typically defined as beginning at Mach 5, is more challenging than supersonic flight at lower speeds because of the higher temperatures and pressures involved with the faster flight speed. The speed of sound, Mach 1, is about 760 mph (1,223 kph) at sea level.

Conventional turbine jet engines can't handle such speeds, Air Force officials said.

But scramjets, air-breathing jet engines driven by supersonic combustion, like the one on X-51A have their own challenges too. Air Force project officials compared it to "lighting a match in a hurricane and keeping it burning."


The X-51A is not the U.S. military's only project undergoing tests this year.

The Air Force Research Laboratory and scientists in Australia successfully launched an unmanned suborbital rocket in March during a joint hypersonic flight test that hit Mach 5.5.

In late April, an unmanned hypersonic glider called HTV-2 failed during its test flight after blasting off on a rocket launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. That test, too, was aimed at learning more about the intricacies of hypersonic flight to support the development of future aircraft technology.

The Air Force also launched the secretive X-37B space plane into orbit in late April from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. The exact mission of that reusable space plane, which is smaller than NASA's space shuttles but entirely robotic, is closely guarded. But amateur skywatchers have managed to spot the mysterious X-37B in the night sky using telescopes equipped with video cameras.

http://blog.seattlepi.com/aerospace/archives/207993.aspVideo clip of the launch[/url]

Conceptual design
30rkyuh.jpg


Attached to the B-52
2hrpusw.jpg


Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne SJY61 scramjet engine for the first X-51A flight undergoes final firing test in NASA Langley hypersonic wind tunnel. Blue haze is Mach 4-5 air flow blowing from right to left across scramjet engine firing with its inlet facing up as it will be ignited over the Pacific Ocean.
mmuexy.jpg
 

xbhaskarx

Member
But it is unmanned, right, that's not really the same.
Which plane held the record before this? I know it was the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird many years ago...
 

Kiwi

Member
XiaNaphryz said:
After the flight, the vehicle was expected to splash into the ocean. There were no plans to recover the craft, according to the Air Force.

Then what's the point testing this craft. They should put inflatable flotation device to recover the fallen craft.
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
xbhaskarx said:
But it is unmanned, right, that's not really the same.
Which plane held the record before this? I know it was the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird many years ago...
There are both manned and unmanned records ya know. :p

And the record in this case is the length of time the craft flew at hypersonic speeds. I believe the previous scramjet model holds the speed record, which hit Mach 9.8.
 
Kiwi said:
Then what's the point testing this craft. They should put inflatable flotation device to recover the fallen craft.

The engine is revolutionary, and we just need to make sure it works and is stable.
 
Kiwi said:
Then what's the point testing this craft. They should put inflatable flotation device to recover the fallen craft.
If you read the article. This was a test to see if the engine would actually work/perform as expected.
 
gamerecks said:
So the engine works? What non-weapon applications does this have?
It probably doesn't have any military applications at the moment either. Still pretty much research and design I would think.
 
GashPrex said:
you know...getting places faster...
Hahaha no. Remember Concorde? Pretty much the only airliner that traveled at faster than sound speeds. It got decommissioned so there aren't even any passenger planes that fly at super sonic speeds.
 
GashPrex said:
you know...getting places faster...

propeller -> jet -> scramjet

I understand that but it sounds like this would have no real purpose outside of missles.

This quote

But scramjets, air-breathing jet engines driven by supersonic combustion, like the one on X-51A have their own challenges too. Air Force project officials compared it to "lighting a match in a hurricane and keeping it burning."

makes it sound like that getting the technology working is way far off. Maybe its the pessimist in me.
 
gamerecks said:
I understand that but it sounds like this would have no real purpose outside of missles.

This quote



makes it sound like that getting the technology working is way far off. Maybe its the pessimist in me.
They have an engine that actually works. In terms of research, that's pretty damn far down the line.
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
Lostconfused said:
1,223 kph X 5 = 6115

Mach 5 = 5311 According to wolframaplha
At 50,000 feet, you only need to hit around 5400 kph to hit Mach 5. I've updated the OP with the appropriate mph number as well (dropped from 3700 to 3400).

Numbers gotten from quick and dirty calculations.
 
XiaNaphryz said:
At 50,000 feet, you only need to hit around 5400 kph to hit Mach 5. I've updated the OP with the appropriate mph number as well (dropped from 3700 to 3400).

Numbers gotten from quick and dirty calculations.
So the article mentioning the standard speed at sea level was kinda pointless. Well thanks for clearing it up. Looks like wolframaplha is more useful when it comes to hard math.
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
Lostconfused said:
So the article mentioning the standard speed at sea level was kinda pointless. Well thanks for clearing it up. Looks like wolframaplha is more useful when it comes to hard math.
Yeah, I dunno why they bothered mentioning that when altitude is a significant factor in mach speed calculations. Or to be more accurate, air pressure and temperature play a significant factor, which altitude is a major contributor in determining.

Wolframalpha may be more accurate than my number, which may be closer to something like Mach 5.1.
 
emomoonbase said:
So now we can launch 3700mph nukes at people from our new space plane?

No, that's not why we are doing this. Our nuclear capabilities already allow us to destroy any target in under 30 minutes.
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
ConfusingJazz said:
No, that's not why we are doing this. Our nuclear capabilities already allow us to destroy any target in under 30 minutes.
Unless the target is on the moon.
 
Mudkips said:
Voyagers I and II laugh.

I don't understand the point of this post. I fail to see how vehicles launched into space 35 years ago has anything to do with atmospheric testing. I am pretty sure that they would both just sit on the ground if we brought them back somehow.
 

Mudkips

Banned
XiaNaphryz said:
I'm sure either of those could achieve the same speeds when in atmosphere. Thanks for the witty insight!

And I'm sure we need these speeds in atmosphere.

ConfusingJazz said:
I don't understand the point of this post. I fail to see how vehicles launched into space 35 years ago has anything to do with atmospheric testing. I am pretty sure that they would both just sit on the ground if we brought them back somehow.

The point is that this achievement is not a "new record" unless you specify in atmosphere and then include unmanned vehicles.

The record itself has no relevance outside of "oooh, fast", just as mentioning Voyager I and II has no relevance outside of "oooh, fast".

There are no practical applications for this now or anywhere near on the horizon.
If we want to blow shit up at a moments notice, we'll use our submarines.

I'm all for developing the technology, but I've seen / been linked to this story 6 times today, and there's nothing here that's really newsworthy.

My original post about Voyagers I and II was to:
- Put the speed in perspective
- Shit on the use of "NEW RECORD" headlines for non news
- Call attention to the overall irrelevance of the accomplishment to today's world by referencing the speed of space probes, which is irrelevant to anything in atmosphere.

Derp!

Edit:
R2D4 said:
Jetskis laugh This X whatever POS can't do Mach 5 in water!

Another one.


Oh, I forgot, this is GAF.

ThatsTheJoke.GIF
 
Pinko Marx said:
This is probably a dumb question, but can you actually turn at speeds that fast?

I remember reading an article about the SR-71 back when they were retiring the fleet. One of the pilots talked about making a turn at Mach 3, saying that at that speed he would cover three U.S. states making the loop. :lol
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
Mudkips said:
The point is that this achievement is not a "new record" unless you specify in atmosphere and then include unmanned vehicles.
It's a record for sustained flight at hypersonic speeds. I wasn't aware thsoe types of records shouldn't count.

The record is relevant primarily for the field of research into scramjet technologies. For those of us interested in this sort of thing, that's enough relevancy. Records don't necessarily have to mean you're boasting about something - why can't it just be a mark of what's best been done so far that sets a new standard to try and beat?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom