[WCCFTECH] NVIDIA ADA LOVELACE GPU Gets First Rumored Specs: Absolute Monster At 18432 CUDA Cores And 64 TFLOPs Of Graphics Horsepower

To be released by March 2017, nice.

NVIDIA Lovelace AD102 Rumored GPU Specifications

GPUAD102GA102TU102
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAmpereTuring
Process5nmSamsung 8nmTSMC 12nm NFF
Graphics Processing Clusters (GPC)1276
Texture Processing Clusters (TPC)724236
Streaming Multiprocessors (SM)1448472
CUDA Cores18432107524608
Theoretical TFLOPs64.537.616.1
ReleaseMar. 2017Sept. 192022 (TBC)

I kid.

Anyway that's insane. I love it.
 
Buggy Loop said:
I wonder if they reserved a spot at TSMC's 5nm? Would raise the costs of these GPUs considerably, because Apple pretty much has the first spot at the table at TSMC. Is Samsung really ready for 5nm with good yields?
Click to expand...

samsung isn't ready for 5nm yet but they're working on it but it does confirm that nvidia is not working with samsung and tsmc simultaneously. we probably won't see lovelace for a couple years anyway
 
Monster.

Crypto miners gonna be on that ass day one for sure. Kinda unfortunate some folks not only have to deal with scalpers (small bunch relative) but miners too (those have truly fucked the scene snatching supply).

Mining-farm.jpg
 
Last edited:
01011001 said:
there's no such thing as real TF or fake TF

a Flop is an objectively measurable thing
Click to expand...

This isn't true at all. Certain "companies" count TFs differently. Like someone said above that Nvidia at one time combined the calculation of their TFs based on both raw rasterization and RT numbers. And none of us here believes that a proper way to do any of these measurements.
 
mckmas8808 said:
This isn't true at all. Certain "companies" count TFs differently. Like someone said above that Nvidia at one time combined the calculation of their TFs based on both raw rasterization and RT numbers. And none of us here believes that a proper way to do any of these measurements.
Click to expand...
MS tried doing this as well not too long ago with the XSX.
 
In 2022 I think is what the article meant to say (they switched the dates on the old GPU and the new one)
 
It's crazy how even the lowest 3000 series gpu from NVIDIA, is more powerful than ps5. I think there will be a bigger leap that separates PC from consoles even more than in the past.
 
And how many RT cores?

I mean since Nvidia is "ALL IN" on that.
Wanna bet its less then on 3000 series?

If you're "ALL IN" Nvidia, I don't wanna hear less then trippledigit RT core count, on the xx60 version of ADA LOVELACE GPU cards.
 
I can't wait to not be able to buy it! Bots ahoy!
bots GIF by Product Hunt


I'm totally looking forward to upgrading next year so I hope to hell that I'll be able to pick one up.
 
TeamGhobad said:
last year we were circlejerking over 12 teraflops. it seems the gap between pc and console is getting bigger and bigger every gen.
Click to expand...
I believe they were bigger last-gen than they are this gen, atleast in the CPU department.
DonJuanSchlong said:
Several console warriors on this site refused to believe it. If they can post "PC is doomed" threads, 24/7 prior to console launch, I don't see why that's a problem?
Click to expand...
Both of these can be both right and wrong.

But its all stating the obvious really. Top end PC hardware will trounce console hardware.

The question should be if PC hardware can trounce console hardware in the same price range, size range, and so on and so forth.

That argument isn't made here. What is made is stating something very obvious.

And if the point of the argument is to ruffle some console warrior feathers, well... do know that you aren't aiming for quality there then.
 
Redneckerz said:
I believe they were bigger last-gen than they are this gen, atleast in the CPU department.

Both of these can be both right and wrong.

But its all stating the obvious really. Top end PC hardware will trounce console hardware.

The question should be if PC hardware can trounce console hardware in the same price range, size range, and so on and so forth.

That argument isn't made here. What is made is stating something very obvious.

And if the point of the argument is to ruffle some console warrior feathers, well... do know that you aren't aiming for quality there then.
Click to expand...
The lowest end Nvidia 3000x gpu currently, the 3060ti, beats ps5 in performance. So it's not just the enthusiast, high end, and middle end PC with performance crown, but also the low end of PC gaming now. Pricing-wise, consoles will win in that regard. But you are also severely limited with what you can do on a console, vs a PC, which completely changes the dynamic of said price argument.
 
Push that raytracing performance as far as possible. If overall performance is more than 30% better in their 3080 equivalent for the same price, I'll upgrade. If it's a shit show like the 20xx, GTFO. I hope for AMD but am sceptical.

But these specs look really solid, if true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Gamers Nexus: Get it together, NVIDIA | Terrible GPU Driver Stability
2
85
3K
DanEON replied
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB GPU Benchmarks & Specs Leak: Up To 14% Faster Than 4060 Ti
Hardware  2
70
4K
winjer replied
NVIDIA GPU official prices allowed to rise across the board, again!
2 3 4 5
235
283
//DEVIL// replied
Nvidia keeps scamming consumers - The Great NVIDIA Switcheroo | GPU Shrinkflation - New Gamers Nexus video
32
2K
mathello replied
DF - Nintendo Switch 2 Confirmed Specs: CPU, GPU, Memory, System Reservation + More
3 4 5 6 7
302
303
FalconPunch replied
Top Bottom