Support NeoGAF

[Buggy Loop]

you don't know what you talking about. Even Kepler said it yesterday.

Oh yea, they totally had a 5090 killer, 64 GB VRAM, 5GHz, 300W consumption, $999

Every generations they can kill Nvidia, they just don't want to be

 

[SolidQ]

Oh yea, they totally had a 5090 killer, 64 GB VRAM, 5GHz, 300W consumption, $999

800gb vram. Go better sleep and re read again

 

[Hudo]

So Jensen is pushing tech,

Eh. There is a lot of marketing smokescreening going on with the "AI" stuff. Especially for the prices they ask customers to pay.

 

[b0uncyfr0]

Couldn't care less about RT. We need pure unfiltered raw raster performance that's turns heads. If FSR 4 makes it looks even better - then that's a plus.

 

[Gaiff]

The only practical part would be that green b*tches will b*tch about something else.

As opposed to you who has been bitching nonstop for a week now?

Either this poster is a troll, mentally challenged, or both.

 

[llien]

So Jensen is pushing tech

Yeah, that 5070 with compute power of 1/3rd of 4090 but that also equals 4090 is an amazing achievemnt.

And that not even taking into account neurotic radio-extrapolation and transformational diffusion, while AMD is still on what? oN CNN and FOX? Ew.

 

[Kataploom]

Yeah, that 5070 with compute power of 1/3rd of 4090 but that also equals 4090 is an amazing achievemnt.

And that not even taking into account neurotic radio-extrapolation and transformational diffusion, while AMD is still on what? oN CNN and FOX? Ew.

Schrodinger's performance LOL.

They should have shown both AI and raster performance, some people might respond bad to their marketing once they realize they sold their cards for less performant one or for one not as great as they were told.

I think AMD did the right call this time, but not gonna lie, it's getting tedious having to wait for benchmarks, I care more about raster since I don't only play latest AAA and AMD never fails me in that regard, but I want to consider Nvidia too.

 

[coffinbirth]

The 4090 didn't prevent microstutters in CoD MP. Also get them in GeForce Now. Instead of gaming, I'd be more interested in running a local LLM on that thing tbh.

This was a known issue with CoD, was happening on AMD cards too.

 

[llien]

Schrodinger's performance LOL.

I'm sure quantum neural transformers will be in GPUs one day.
And we know, it will be Huang Jensen leading us.

AMD might switch from BBC and FOX to non-quantum transformators by then.

 

[HogIsland]

So Jensen is pushing tech, AMD just gave up and admits they are the poverty brand.

"poverty brand" isn't all bad. AMD is pushing tech in different ways, such as APUs and handhelds.

 

[SmoothBrain]

This was a known issue with CoD, was happening on AMD cards too.

I'm not disputing that it's a CoD problem, but the claim that overpaying on a GPU gives you acceptable performance. It doesn't if the game has some hard pitfalls like micro stuttering. And that is super frustrating in an MP-focused game. I'm sure there are many other examples and a 4090 doesn't change anything in that regard.

 

[Unknown Soldier]

"We observed Nvidia and decided to panic" probably didn't sound as good

 

[cinnamonandgravy]

Couldn't care less about RT.

amd is saying their RT is waaaay more performant now... big what-if, but what if actually became the RT leader and FSR4 doesnt suck?

theyd be competitive again.

 

[Buggy Loop]

amd is saying their RT is waaaay more performant now... big what-if, but what if actually became the RT leader

Then RT matters big time for AMD fans

 

[Kataploom]

amd is saying their RT is waaaay more performant now... big what-if, but what if actually became the RT leader and FSR4 doesnt suck?

theyd be competitive again.

If RT became like 5% or less the performance hit, then it would actually matter because, why leave it aside when it doesn't harm my experience?