• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

What are you reading? (May 2015)

You just lit the Cyan Signal!

YOU ARE 1000% CORRECT

Haha yeah, I think we talked about it a bit in last month's thread.
Poor Shallan, who I like as a character, gets saddled with the worst dialogue due to these terrible jokes.

Aside from jokes, I also don't like the "logic arguments," if that makes sense. When
Shallan and Jasnah are debating the morality of killing those guys in an alley
(minor book 1 spoiler), I got the feeling that I was supposed to be impressed by her mastery of logic, but it didn't really feel authentic to me. That's not super specific, I know, but it's hard to describe.

That said, I really enjoy the originality of the setting and especially the biological aspect, as far as animal and plant species go.
 

Mumei

Member
Hi Gaf! I just graduated college so I am happy to have plenty of free time to read for pleasure. I've collected quite a few books over the past 4 years and haven't opened many of them. Time to get started.

I finished The Brothers Karamazov yesterday after starting it about 1 month ago. I wasn't super captivated by the first few books, but the final 2-3 were amazing! The philosophical bits are probably the most famous, but I have to admit that they didn't strike me as much as they would have a few years ago. Still, enjoyable. I do feel like I learned something from the character Alyosha, though, about what it means to be gracious. Not only do you be kind to others, but you should allow others to be kind to you. If you always decline out of humility, then you are denying others the chance to be altruistic. Anyway, just a nice reminder in this hyper ambitious and individualistic world...

I'm now reading The Brief and Wonderous Life of Oscar Wao. I've only read a chapter but, I'm not sure if I am into it. I'll save my judgement for the end.

Excellent way to start things off! The Brothers Karamazov is a personal favorite.

Haha yeah, I think we talked about it a bit in last month's thread.
Poor Shallan, who I like as a character, gets saddled with the worst dialogue due to these terrible jokes.

Aside from jokes, I also don't like the "logic arguments," if that makes sense. When
Shallan and Jasnah are debating the morality of killing those guys in an alley
(minor book 1 spoiler), I got the feeling that I was supposed to be impressed by her mastery of logic, but it didn't really feel authentic to me. That's not super specific, I know, but it's hard to describe.

That said, I really enjoy the originality of the setting and especially the biological aspect, as far as animal and plant species go.


YOU ARE 1000% CORRECT

<3

And yes, I agree that Shallan doesn't come across as smart as I think she is supposed to. It's rare that I see a "smart" character who comes across as smart when we're being shown how smart they are (as opposed to told), though, and those characters I think tend to be smart in an "understanding people" sort of way. Miles Vorkosigan is a good example of this; he's not portrayed as a scientific or mathematical genius, but rather as someone who really gets people and their motivations and knows how to act because of it. And that's something that it seems more likely an author will portray well.

I enjoy cringe-worthy puns, though, so the humor doesn't bother me.
 

aidan

Hugo Award Winning Author and Editor
Excellent way to start things off! The Brothers Karamazov is a personal favorite.

<3

And yes, I agree that Shallan doesn't come across as smart as I think she is supposed to. It's rare that I see a "smart" character who comes across as smart when we're being shown how smart they are (as opposed to told), though, and those characters I think tend to be smart in an "understanding people" sort of way. Miles Vorkosigan is a good example of this; he's not portrayed as a scientific or mathematical genius, but rather as someone who really gets people and their motivations and knows how to act because of it. And that's something that it seems more likely an author will portray well.

I enjoy cringe-worthy puns, though, so the humor doesn't bother me.

I've yet to figure out if Sanderson believes Shallan is as smart/funny as she wants to be, or if he's in on the joke, too.
 

Uzzy

Member
I finished The Remains of the Day, and wow. What an astonishingly good book. Totally heartbreaking to read as Mr Steven's identity unravelled through introspection.

And now for something completely different, I'm reading John Scalzi's Redshirts

16181585.jpg
 

ShaneB

Member
That's how I felt with Desperation. Not super great, but I'll be damned if it wasn't a page-turner.

Think it's 10, yes. It's a long time to wait for it to finish. Are you going to be watching the show, which looks watchable but not great?

I'll be checking out the show, guess my expectations are keeping in check though. Hope for something cool, and successful, but we shall see.

Now that you mention it...I guess I just blocked that from my memory. His second book is even more depressing in that regard.

It's a tough read when it gets that personal
I certainly got emotional knowing I wonder if my Father is proud of me and Dirk asking his Father that..
, but it's meaningful to see that side of these athletes.

If you want a fun read, I'll certainly recommend 'I don't care if we never get back', the baseball road trip book I read earlier this year. Absolutely hilarious with such great quotes as "If you're going to do something stupid, at least be smart about it."
 

Necrovex

Member
Are we destined to have a monthly discussion about how Shallan is unfunny?

Been distracted by work (and the Chimera Ant arc in Hunter X Hunter), but I've been chipping away on Mandela's autobiography. Still excellent stuff. The experience is slightly enchanted due to first-hand knowledge of rural South African life.
 

Mumei

Member
This is one of the things I really enjoy about HPMOR and Worm. We're not just told that the main characters are smart, and we're not even just shown that other people think they're smart, or that they overcome other smart people and therefore must be smart; we get to see actual chains of reasoning and the way they make decisions and really understand for ourselves how intelligent they are.

I know HPMOR, but what is Worm?
 

aidan

Hugo Award Winning Author and Editor
I've said this before, but I think he just doesn't have much of a sense of humor. You can see the same thing going on in other characters he writes who are supposed to be funny.

I mean, I've met Sanderson, had dinner with him. He's funny enough, but in a wry sort of way that I don't feel translates very well to fiction. In something so scripted, so heavily edited, it can be tough to nail down the sense of spontaneity necessary to make it work. It's impressive when you're speaking directly to someone and they say something sharp, timely, witty. When you know they've had time to sit and think it through, to edit and adjust the phrasing, it just comes off flat.

Some authors do it better than others, of course. Lynch being one of the best.
 
D

Deleted member 1235

Unconfirmed Member
Just ordered this. Probably won't be here until either Friday, or next Monday. I've heard good stuff. Anyone read it?

revival-stephenking-cover-UK-hodder-stoughton--static.jpg
a fucked up story and one of his less horrible ends. was in disturbing form in this one. i liked it a lot
 

Mumei

Member
This! http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=162948448&postcount=151

I feel like I must have already talked to you about it, but maybe not. :p I just finished the 19th arc and am taking a break to read other stuff for a little while.

Oh, nope. I had read that post, but we've never actually talked about it. I was actually disappointed that it wasn't a webcomic, because it sounds like something that could make for a great webcomic.

I'm probably being a little over-broad in my criticism, yes. And I shouldn't be too harsh--I also struggle a bit translating my humor from in-person to on-the-page.

Quoi?
 
I mean, I've met Sanderson, had dinner with him. He's funny enough, but in a wry sort of way that I don't feel translates very well to fiction. In something so scripted, so heavily edited, it can be tough to nail down the sense of spontaneity necessary to make it work. It's impressive when you're speaking directly to someone and they say something sharp, timely, witty. When you know they've had time to sit and think it through, to edit and adjust the phrasing, it just comes off flat.

Some authors do it better than others, of course. Lynch being one of the best.
Bujold is also fantastic at this. A Civil Campaign has some genuinely lol parts.
 

wamberz1

Member
I've said this before, but I think he just doesn't have much of a sense of humor. You can see the same thing going on in other characters he writes who are supposed to be funny.
There are some moments in steelheart and firefight where I genuinely laughed, so I don't think he's completely unable to write good jokes. but I do agree that Shallan's "humor" stuff had me groaning.
 

wamberz1

Member
So I finished Hero of Ages. Liked the ending way more than I thought I would, Especially given how many separate story threads were going on around the half way point. I would say overall I enjoyed the Mistborn series, even though the second book was such a letdown.

Next up (speaking of bujold lol):
The_curse_of_chalion_cover.jpg
 

Grym

Member
I'm re-reading Red Mars. I read it many years ago but never got around to picking up the sequels. Now I want to read them so I'm starting over

77507.jpg
 

mu cephei

Member
Mm, speaking of Bujold...
Yesterday I finished the first book in Young Miles, The Warrior's Apprentice. Rather amusingly, I posted my last comment about it being 'excellent fun' right before the shit hit the fan, and that description doesn't really do the book justice. The last hundred pages were amazing, I had to put the book down between each chapter and take a breath. Bujold really knows how to write action. And how to kick you in the gut
I loved Bothari :(
Miles is fab. It's curious how Bujold writes her characters, she never belabours the point or seems to go into much detail, but they still manage to be utterly realistic. Anyway, every bit as good as Mumei et al say it is.

Before moving on to the second book in the volume I'm reading So Long, See You Tomorrow by William Maxwell.
 

Mumei

Member
Mm, speaking of Bujold...
Yesterday I finished the first book in Young Miles, The Warrior's Apprentice. Rather amusingly, I posted my last comment about it being 'excellent fun' right before the shit hit the fan, and that description doesn't really do the book justice. The last hundred pages were amazing, I had to put the book down between each chapter and take a breath. Bujold really knows how to write action. And how to kick you in the gut
I loved Bothari :(
Miles is fab. It's curious how Bujold writes her characters, she never belabours the point or seems to go into much detail, but they still manage to be utterly realistic. Anyway, every bit as good as Mumei et al say it is.

Before moving on to the second book in the volume I'm reading So Long, See You Tomorrow by William Maxwell.

She has the best character writing in science fiction, I think. There's a review for one of the later books that I found online awhile back that contained what I thought was an excellent summation of her qualities as a writer:

I’ve talked before about all the things which make Bujold, arguably, the best SF writer working today, but they bear repeating:

(1) The smooth, perfectly natural use of her science fiction. After finishing A Civil Campaign I actually thought to myself, “There was scarcely any science fiction in this novel at all.” And then, after another moment, “Except the functional sex change. And the bioengineered bugs. And the uterine replicators.” All of which the plot is directly dependent upon. Not to mention the clones, gene therapy, hover cars, automatic traffic systems, stunners, wormholes, terraforming, contraceptive implants, and force fields which you’ll find laying around.

Whoops. Guess there’s quite a bit of science fiction in there after all.

The reason people say this type of thing about Bujold – and why even my subconscious will occasionally spew up such thoughts – is that Bujold is simply masterful in her ability to create a world utterly of the future yet, at the same time, utterly believable in its organic detail. You literally don’t think about the uterine replicators, clones, and terraforming as being particularly remarkable because Bujold makes them seen perfectly natural.

And, of course, that’s pretty dang remarkable.

(2) The detailed, believable, and moving portrayals of her characters. Bujold is one of those authors seemingly incapable of producing cardboard characters. Even the bit parts who show up for no more than a page or so are given a unique identity, personality, and presence. And her main characters are drawn with a depth and humanity which make them either beloved or hated without ever hitting a false note.

(3) The compelling and well-paced plots. Bujold’s books are, quite simply, page-turners. The compulsion to find out what happens next simply never lets you go, even when the book comes to an end. Plus, Bujold never drags her feet or rushes her tale – she tells the story in precisely the amount of space it needs to be told in, neither more nor less.

(4) The clean, expressive prose. Reading a Bujold novel is like looking through a clear window. The characters and their actions simply present themselves before the mind’s eye, without obstruction or distraction.

(5) The accessibility. Bujold’s Vorkosigan novels are the only series in which a new reader can pick up any single volume and enjoy it fully and completely. No matter which book you’re reading, Bujold somehow manages to accomplish the impossible – neither boring long-time readers with constant recaps nor expecting new readers to be familiar with her previous works. (The trick seems to be that, in any given book, the previous continuity is seamlessly handled like background information would be in any other novel.)

And, when all is said and done, the sum of all these strengths is stunningly greater than its notable parts.

Bujold’s one intermittent flaw as a writer, in my experience, is her peculiar variation upon the deus ex machina. I call it her “random meeting in a space station” plot point. In short, she will occasionally hinge an entire plot upon – literally – a random meeting in a space station.

Link if anyone wishes to read the entire thing (A Civil Campaign / Komarr). I don't actually think there's anything that could really be called a spoiler but up to you.
 

Piecake

Member

Currently reading this. It is pretty good so far. I also had the impression that the 50's were a 'comparatively' good time for China under communist rule. This book takes apart that claim. I am only about 60 pages in and I already am convinced. It is also pretty funny reading 1 star reviews by communists on amazon. Southern confederate apologists and commies, nothing more entertaining than their bitter tears.

I'll be checking out his Mao's Great Famine book after this as well.
 
Finished The Island of Dr. Moreau and The Quiet American this morning. I really disliked the first half or so of The Quiet American - it made me put the book down a lot, but the second half was excellent. Really ended up feeling bad for Pyle even though he turned out to be a (misguided and oddly innocent?) monster.

Now reading, thanks to the Horror Fiction thread, Blindsight. Rated #1 on Goodreads for space horror. For anyone that wants some really hard sci-fi a la The Martian I think you might like this. Some of the concepts, tech, and physics seem high level and well researched. Haven't gotten to any horror yet but I'm only about 20% in so far.


Blindsight by Peter Watts

I've also renewed efforts to read Invincible Ultimate Collection book 1 and Sin in the Second City


Invincible: Ultimate Collection, Vol. 1 by Robert Kirkman


Sin in the Second City: Madams, Ministers, Playboys, and the Battle for America's Soul by Karen Abbott
 

Verdre

Unconfirmed Member
Read Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel

Virus kills everyone, post apocalypse, look at all these contrived interconnected stories.

I think I see what the author was going for, but it was done rather tediously. I've been making dubious book choices.
 

tmarques

Member
008087.jpg


Just stopping by to say everyone should read this at some point in their lives. I'm floored.

Also having just read

the-custom-of-the-country1.jpg


I'm again questioning why Edith Wharton isn't at least as esteemed as Jane Austen. She certainly created more believable, complex characters.
 
That is... quite the analogy. Thanks for the advice.



It's just a term I made up on the spot—humanity's on its last legs, the Earth is about the be destroyed, and a small, intrepid group must embark on a perilous mission to ensure humanity's survival.

Sounds like only the beginning of Seveneves really hits on this archetype, though.

His stuff is great, but it can also be...ah... Well, let's just say that I do love him as a writer, but his later stuff is not the best entry point (IMO).

There's actually an interesting backstory to the genesis of the book: It was originally a fictional book that appeared in another one of her books, Palimpsest, as the book that a character - November - loved as a child. Valente would get questions about the novel often, with people wanting to know if it was a real novel and to read it. She then wrote the book as a crowd-funded project that was published online serially, and then was finally picked up for publication.



*excited gesticulating*

Yes. I love it.

That's pretty cool. I love how it came around. Books within books~


Starting on the Lies of Locke Lamora

:3


Should we start discussing how we need 500 pages of Kaladin brooding?

Let's not, please. I'm not sure I can take much more of him and
his annoying fairy girlfriend.
 

Mumei

Member
That's pretty cool. I love how it came around. Books within books~

It is! And I wanted to direct your attention to a post:

Mm, speaking of Bujold...
Yesterday I finished the first book in Young Miles, The Warrior's Apprentice. Rather amusingly, I posted my last comment about it being 'excellent fun' right before the shit hit the fan, and that description doesn't really do the book justice. The last hundred pages were amazing, I had to put the book down between each chapter and take a breath. Bujold really knows how to write action. And how to kick you in the gut
I loved Bothari :(
Miles is fab. It's curious how Bujold writes her characters, she never belabours the point or seems to go into much detail, but they still manage to be utterly realistic. Anyway, every bit as good as Mumei et al say it is.

Before moving on to the second book in the volume I'm reading So Long, See You Tomorrow by William Maxwell.

:3
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
Moby Dick said:
"Speak, thou vast and venerable head," muttered Ahab, "which, though ungarnished with a beard, yet here and there lookest hoary with mosses; speak, mighty head, and tell us the secret thing that is in thee. Of all divers, thou hast dived the deepest. That head upon which the upper sun now gleams, has moved amid this world's foundations. Where unrecorded names and navies rust, and untold hopes and anchors rot; where in her murderous hold this frigate earth is ballasted with bones of millions of the drowned; there, in that awful water-land, there was thy most familiar home. Thou hast been where bell or diver never went; hast slept by many a sailor's side, where sleepless mothers would give their lives to lay them down. Thou saw'st the locked lovers when leaping from their flaming ship; heart to heart they sank beneath the exulting wave; true to each other, when heaven seemed false to them. Thou saw'st the murdered mate when tossed by pirates from the midnight deck; for hours he fell into the deeper midnight of the insatiate maw; and his murderers still sailed on unharmed&#8212; while swift lightnings shivered the neighboring ship that would have borne a righteous husband to outstretched, longing arms. O head! thou hast seen enough to split the planets and make an infidel of Abraham, and not one syllable is thine!"
Dang.
anuxi_rum.gif
 

Dispatch

Member
It's end-of-the-year-novel/play time in school, so I've been reading the following along with my students:

  • The Crucible for A.P. 11
  • Atonement for Honors English 12
  • The Things They Carried for Honors English 11

I guess I have a bit of a "Creative Lying" motif going here, which was completely unintentional.
 

Necrovex

Member
We need to cycle in A Little Life talk in our monthly discussion. It deserves to be read as much as Stoner, City of Stairs, and Goblin Emperor. Mumei, I recall you posting an indepth article of A Little Life spoiling the story. Would you repost it for little ol' me?
 

Mumei

Member
We need to cycle in A Little Life talk in our monthly discussion. It deserves to be read as much as Stoner, City of Stairs, and Goblin Emperor. Mumei, I recall you posting an indepth article of A Little Life spoiling the story. Would you repost it for little ol' me?

I agree. A Little Life is extraordinary, and more people should read it. I've never felt more connected to a group of characters, or read characters that felt so fully-formed before. Yanagihara able to elicit a remarkable sense of emotional connection with the characters.

For anyone unfamiliar with the premise, the New Yorker's Briefly Noted review is as fine an introduction as any:

A Little Life, by Hanya Yanagihara (Doubleday). This exquisite, unsettling novel follows four male friends from their meeting as students at a prestigious Northeastern college through young adulthood and into middle age. Yanagihara deftly outlines the trials of JB, a brilliant but tactless painter; Malcolm, an architect with moneyed parents; and Willem, a would-be ranch hand turned award-winning actor. But her talent is most apparent in the depiction of Jude, a prominent corporate litigator haunted by a brutally abusive childhood and struggling with &#8220;the terrifying largeness, the impossibility, of the world.&#8221; The book shifts from a generational portrait to something darker and more tender: an examination of the depths of human cruelty, counterbalanced by the restorative powers of friendship.​

It's a difficult read, in an emotional sense, but if you can handle it, I think it's worth it. If you're still unsure, I suggest listening to Books on the Nightstand, Episode 322 "In which I manage not to cry". For the first time in almost seven years, they dedicated an entire episode to one book, and I think Ann does a great job selling it.

But Necrovex, I don't know what you are talking about. I didn't think I'd linked any articles here, since I've been talking a lot with mu cephei and to a lesser extent Dandy Crocodile through PMs. I just did a search, and the closest thing I came across was talking about - but not linking to - the New Yorker's review "The Subversive Brilliance of A Little Life."
 

Necrovex

Member
I agree. A Little Life is extraordinary, and more people should read it. I've never felt more connected to a group of characters, or read characters that felt so fully-formed before. Yanagihara able to elicit a remarkable sense of emotional connection with the characters.

For anyone unfamiliar with the premise, the New Yorker's Briefly Noted review is as fine an introduction as any:

A Little Life, by Hanya Yanagihara (Doubleday). This exquisite, unsettling novel follows four male friends from their meeting as students at a prestigious Northeastern college through young adulthood and into middle age. Yanagihara deftly outlines the trials of JB, a brilliant but tactless painter; Malcolm, an architect with moneyed parents; and Willem, a would-be ranch hand turned award-winning actor. But her talent is most apparent in the depiction of Jude, a prominent corporate litigator haunted by a brutally abusive childhood and struggling with “the terrifying largeness, the impossibility, of the world.” The book shifts from a generational portrait to something darker and more tender: an examination of the depths of human cruelty, counterbalanced by the restorative powers of friendship.​

It's a difficult read, in an emotional sense, but if you can handle it, I think it's worth it. If you're still unsure, I suggest listening to Books on the Nightstand, Episode 322 "In which I manage not to cry". For the first time in almost seven years, they dedicated an entire episode to one book, and I think Ann does a great job selling it.

But Necrovex, I don't know what you are talking about. I didn't think I'd linked any articles here, since I've been talking a lot with mu cephei and to a lesser extent Dandy Crocodile through PMs. I just did a search, and the closest thing I came across was talking about - but not linking to - the New Yorker's review "The Subversive Brilliance of A Little Life."

I'm trying my best to spread the gospels to my friends about this book. I decided to download that episode of the podcast, even with my servere data restriction, due to my utter adoration of A Little Life. Side note, is it worth listening to this podcast on a weekly (or whenever I have wifi) basis?

Perhaps someone else brought up an article and I thought it was you. I recall a poster saying there was a worthwhile article to read once one completed this novel. In my mind, it was something I could see you writing.
 

Mumei

Member
I'm trying my best to spread the gospels to my friends about this book. I decided to download that episode of the podcast, even with my servere data restriction, due to my utter adoration of A Little Life. Side note, is it worth listening to this podcast on a weekly (or whenever I have wifi) basis?

I really enjoy it, and have been listening to older episodes. Obviously not everything they talk about interests me, especially when it involves retreats from four or five years ago or whatever, but they brought a lot of books to my attention that I hadn't been aware of previously. I read The Sparrow, Children of God, and You're An Animal, Viskovitz! thanks to the recommendations on the podcast, and they were all great and books that I wouldn't have heard of without listening to it.

Perhaps someone else brought up an article and I thought it was you. I recall a poster saying there was a worthwhile article to read once one completed this novel. In my mind, it was something I could see you writing.

Hmm. It may have been this article in Vulture, where Hanya talks about the art that influenced the making of the novel structurally or thematically.
 
Working on this:

5130XwQUcTL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-v3-big,TopRight,0,-55_SX278_SY278_PIkin4,BottomRight,1,22_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg


Not sold yet, but the whole trilogy is so highly rated, I expect to be before long.

And this, which I'm working through slowly in order to savor it:

511eLl4A81L._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-v3-big,TopRight,0,-55_SX278_SY278_PIkin4,BottomRight,1,22_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg


DO NOT get this on Kindle. I'm reading the physical copy and it would be a terrible e-experience.
 

Necrovex

Member
I really enjoy it, and have been listening to older episodes. Obviously not everything they talk about interests me, especially when it involves retreats from four or five years ago or whatever, but they brought a lot of books to my attention that I hadn't been aware of previously. I read The Sparrow, Children of God, and You're An Animal, Viskovitz! thanks to the recommendations on the podcast, and they were all great and books that I wouldn't have heard of without listening to it.

Finished listening to that episode, Ann does a terrific job on selling the book. I seldom feel emotional when it comes to reading literature, yet this book almost triggered a bloody panic attack in a public area. Emotionally wrecked is a fantastic description of my feelings.

I also want to read the Goldfinch after hearing Ann compare A Little Life to it.
 

Cade

Member
Oh God Nemesis Games is on the 2nd? I thought it was middle of June, like Barkham Knight. Shit. Gotta scrounge up some Kindle funds asap.
 

aidan

Hugo Award Winning Author and Editor
Oh God Nemesis Games is on the 2nd? I thought it was middle of June, like Barkham Knight. Shit. Gotta scrounge up some Kindle funds asap.

I saw Nemesis Games at my local Chapters yesterday. No early release on Kindle, though. ;)
 

Mumei

Member
Finished listening to that episode, Ann does a terrific job on selling the book. I seldom feel emotional when it comes to reading literature, yet this book almost triggered a bloody panic attack in a public area. Emotionally wrecked is a fantastic description of my feelings.

I also want to read the Goldfinch after hearing Ann compare A Little Life to it.

I've seen the comparison a few times. In the Huffington Post review for the novel, Claire Fallon starts off by saying, "After the publication of Donna Tartt’s The Goldfinch in 2013, critical opinion diverged sharply; the book won the Pulitzer Prize, but was deemed by some literati to be poorly written, unserious, a gothic fairy tale for adults. Hanya Yanagihara’s doorstop of a second novel, A Little Life, seems primed to elicit similar reactions."

In this case, "some literati" refers to the reviewers writing for The New Yorker, The Paris Review, and The New York Review of Books. I have not yet read The Goldfinch, but so far that particular prediction hasn't panned out. The New Yorker reviews were glowing, and while the latter two publications have not officially reviewed the novel, there are enough effusively positive tweets about it amongst staff writers from those publications to make a guess about which way the winds are blowing.

Oh, and I thought of something else I might have linked to that you might find interesting: The Instagram page. I would also suggest checking out the Twitter account and the Tumbr.
 

Cade

Member
I saw Nemesis Games at my local Chapters yesterday. No early release on Kindle, though. ;)

Aidan why didn't you buy it for me? Not coooool :(

Well, means I gotta finish The Regulators quickly.. and maybe squeeze in On Stranger Tides after.
 

Since I'm done with exams I've kept up the tradition of reading something local to begin my vacations. Now despite the obvious title implying a sorts of self help book, it actually is a fictional narrative revolving around a character's life. I think it's a good read, starting and ending superbly but somewhat disappointing in the middle parts. The whole book does a great job of capturing the surroundings but the overly detailed descriptiveness, which many South Asian authors tend to do, felt more towards dragging the progression as a whole. It's also somewhat missing the subtlety that I was realistically expecting in the humor and interaction between the characters. In comparison it is severely lacking the charm that was in Moth Smoke (the author's first book), and though the story is worthwhile itself it's just not as engaging as I would have liked.
 

Verdre

Unconfirmed Member
Servants of the Storm by Delilah S. Dawson

Set in the south after a hurricane. A girl watches her friend die and is put on antipsychotics in the aftermath. The first half of the book deals with her going off her meds after she starts seeing things and has a nice atmosphere, with the maybe-magical-maybe-not bleeding in nicely as she becomes obsessed with one of the things she sees.

Then it becomes an urban fantasy. Disappointment.
 

Uzzy

Member
I finished Redshirts, by John Scalzi. Pretty funny book, it had me laughing aloud on the bus at a few points, full of witty, sharp dialogue between the characters. That said, the characters were pretty weak, barely containing any real identity. Very meta too, though I rather wish the book had a little more to say about the main plot twist in the book. But it's a comedy book really, so it's probably a bit unfair to criticise it over not delving into the philosophical ramifications of that twist.

Not at all sure what I'll read next. I've got a fair few options, some sci fi, some fantasy, some history. I've got a copy of Ready Player One somewhere around here, might just read that.
 

mu cephei

Member
She has the best character writing in science fiction, I think. There's a review for one of the later books that I found online awhile back that contained what I thought was an excellent summation of her qualities as a writer:

Link if anyone wishes to read the entire thing (A Civil Campaign / Komarr). I don't actually think there's anything that could really be called a spoiler but up to you.

That's a great summation. The deus ex machina in Shards of Honor and The Warrior's Apprentice is probably the only thing that bugged me, but I decided if there had to be one flaw, I could easily put up with this one. Regarding the minor characters, at first I wasn't sure about a few of them - Drou and Baz for example - however I think I just found them annoying rather than unreal! I can't think of a science fiction series that actually has better characterisation either, although my reading in the genre is limited. Oh, and one thing the linked review says, and is talked about upthread, is how funny these books are. Basically they have everything :D
 

VanWinkle

Member
I just bought a copy of Words of Radiance from a third party seller on Amazon for $8, and I opened it and saw this signature. I want to freak out with glee because he's my favorite author, but I want to be sure this isn't like some default fake signature. Can anybody check their copy to see if this signature is on it? Thanks.

 

aidan

Hugo Award Winning Author and Editor
I just bought a copy of Words of Radiance from a third party seller on Amazon for $8, and I opened it and saw this signature. I want to freak out with glee because he's my favorite author, but I want to be sure this isn't like some default fake signature. Can anybody check their copy to see if this signature is on it? Thanks.

I don't have my signed copy of A Memory of Light at hand, so I can't provide a photo, but that looks legit to me.
 

SolKane

Member
the-custom-of-the-country1.jpg


I'm again questioning why Edith Wharton isn't at least as esteemed as Jane Austen. She certainly created more believable, complex characters.

I would say Edith Wharton is as esteemed (if not more so) than Austen. She did win a Pulitzer Prize, after all. Two of her novels are highly regarded as classics of the 20th century.
 
Top Bottom