This week I read a pretty long article (about 30 pages) written by John McCain in 1973 about his years as a POW in Vietnam. It was pretty intense:
He has a lot of good things to say in the article about Richard Nixon ("I admire President Nixon's courage," he says.) Which gets to what's unusual about McCain--even though he's pretty clearly very conservative, a lot of liberals admire him, or at least respect him. I think more than a few Democrats would have voted for McCain over Gore in 2000, if the Republicans had run him instead of Bush.
On the other hand, some people these days think McCain is a bit of a political patsy, a tool of the neo-cons.
So what's your personal opinion of the guy? It sometimes seems like liberals, who like to believe that McCain is somehow more rational or legitimate than Bush, are trying to say he's a sell-out now that he's lining up behind the Bush administration in this election year. But the truth is that McCain has been a hardline-conservative throughout his life--we really shouldn't be surprised by his political stance. So why do liberals harbor this sort of affection for him? (I'll say, as a liberal, that given the choice I'd prefer him in office to Bush--he gives the impression of being a politician who founds his opinions on rational arguments, as opposed to Bush, who makes his decisions for God knows what reasons.)
On the other hand, it's also unusual that someone who's seen so many of the horrors of war firsthand is accepting of the long drawn-out conflict that the "War on Terror" promises to be. Maybe he just feels like in a time of war, you line up behind your Commander-in-Chief and put politics aside?
John McCain said:I remained in solitary confinement from [March 1968] for more than two years. I was not allowed to see or talk to or communicate with any of my fellow prisoners. My room was fairly decent-sized--I'd say it was about 10 by 10. The door was solid. There were no windows.[...] The roof was in and it got hot as hell in there. The room was kind of dim--night and day--but they kept on a small light bulb, so they could observe me. I was in that place for more than two years.
John McCain said:It was in May 1969 that [the Viet Cong] wanted me to write--as I remember--a letter to U.S. pilots who were flying over North Vietnam asking them not to do it. I was being forced to stand up continuously--sometimes they'd make you stand up or sit on a stool for a long period of time. It'd stood up for a couple of days, with a respite only because one of the guards--the only real human being I met over there--let me lie down for a couple of hours while he was on watch the middle of one night.
One of the strategies we worked out was not to let them make you break yourself. If you get tired of standing, just sit down--make them force you up. So I sat down, and this little guard who was a particularly hateful man came in and jumped up and down on my knee. After that I had to go back on a crutch for the next year and a half.
He has a lot of good things to say in the article about Richard Nixon ("I admire President Nixon's courage," he says.) Which gets to what's unusual about McCain--even though he's pretty clearly very conservative, a lot of liberals admire him, or at least respect him. I think more than a few Democrats would have voted for McCain over Gore in 2000, if the Republicans had run him instead of Bush.
On the other hand, some people these days think McCain is a bit of a political patsy, a tool of the neo-cons.
Sen. John McCain, the president's political pal, showed up the other day on a news program with Aaron Brown, the former Seattle news anchor who now punches the clock for CNN.
Their chat turned from the Republican National Convention to our troops in Iraq.
McCain: The United States will probably be there militarily for a long time.
Brown: What is a long time?
McCain: Ten years, 20 years. [...]
We didn't want this. What we fear -- the terrible ghost of Vietnam -- looms. [...] "Not so bad -- 10 years, 20 years," McCain said, trying to blunt the edge of his own Iraq estimate. "We've been in Korea for 50 years. We've been in West Germany for 50 years. We've been in Bosnia for what ... nine or 10 years."
McCain has his head neck deep in the Bush Kool-Aid. He is quaffing the administration's rationale for engaging in a war we shouldn't be fighting, against an enemy that pales in potential danger compared with North Korea or Iran.
So what's your personal opinion of the guy? It sometimes seems like liberals, who like to believe that McCain is somehow more rational or legitimate than Bush, are trying to say he's a sell-out now that he's lining up behind the Bush administration in this election year. But the truth is that McCain has been a hardline-conservative throughout his life--we really shouldn't be surprised by his political stance. So why do liberals harbor this sort of affection for him? (I'll say, as a liberal, that given the choice I'd prefer him in office to Bush--he gives the impression of being a politician who founds his opinions on rational arguments, as opposed to Bush, who makes his decisions for God knows what reasons.)
On the other hand, it's also unusual that someone who's seen so many of the horrors of war firsthand is accepting of the long drawn-out conflict that the "War on Terror" promises to be. Maybe he just feels like in a time of war, you line up behind your Commander-in-Chief and put politics aside?