Instant_Classic
Member

This pic was from five years ago, of Phil supposedly playing the recently cancelled Perfect Dark.
Was he playing Perfect Dark, or something else?
I honestly thought the game looked great. I'm becoming more and more disappointed it was cancelled. Any chance a spiritual successor can rise from the ashes? Imperfect Dark?
I think people have the wrong perception of Rare.Looked great because it was all fake apparently
So annoyed. Rare could have been with Nintendo today instead.
Was that way before MS was interested in buying them or after?I think people have the wrong perception of Rare.
Most of the key talent left years ago.
Honestly by the time MS bought them, they were kind of just living off their legacy of games like Banjo, Perfect Dark, and 007.Was that way before MS was interested in buying them or after?
It was a PERFECTLY DARK screen.
I think that guy was at insomniac before joining the initiative, but I guess he smelled all Phil's bullshit and went back to insomniac.Phil wearing a sub pop jacket somehow makes me hate him even more.
Wonder if the guy smiling next to him got laid off.
I honestly thought the game looked great. I'm becoming more and more disappointed it was cancelled. Any chance a spiritual successor can rise from the ashes? Imperfect Dark?
Looked great because it was all fake apparently
So annoyed. Rare could have been with Nintendo today instead.
He came from Insomniac, worked on PD for a couple of years I think, and jumped ship back to Insomniac.Phil wearing a sub pop jacket somehow makes me hate him even more.
Wonder if the guy smiling next to him got laid off.
favorite pic of the year
Not at all debunked.It wasn't fake. That was debunked.
Not at all debunked.
The developer, in fact, pretty much confirmed that it was fake. Now he is arguing about the fact it was not 100% fake.
This is his statement:
"He states that the demo footage itself was "in-engine" (note that in-engine =/= in-game), and that it worked best when following the scripted path that is being shown in the footage, though "it still worked even if you didn't hit the marks perfectly."
He also acknowledges that there was "some fake stuff in it" and that the demonstration of gameplay mechanics and systems "worked juuuust enough" to look good on video. They were making design decisions behind-the-scenes as the trailer was being assembled so they could be implemented in the demo, so as to not lie to players on what the game was or wasn't,.
He asserts that the parkour was "all real", and the hacking/deception was "mostly real." The combat was "real in the sense that someone had to do all that stuff in the video," but it was purposely scripted that way and seemingly didn't work well if deviated from.
this's what's called a 'rule of thumb'...There all lying to you.
Every Company.
Everyone of them.
All the Time.
Too soon
I think people have the wrong perception of Rare.
Most of the key talent left years ago.
Not at all debunked.
The developer, in fact, pretty much confirmed that it was fake. Now he is arguing about the fact it was not 100% fake.
This is his statement:
"He states that the demo footage itself was "in-engine" (note that in-engine =/= in-game), and that it worked best when following the scripted path that is being shown in the footage, though "it still worked even if you didn't hit the marks perfectly."
He also acknowledges that there was "some fake stuff in it" and that the demonstration of gameplay mechanics and systems "worked juuuust enough" to look good on video. They were making design decisions behind-the-scenes as the trailer was being assembled so they could be implemented in the demo, so as to not lie to players on what the game was or wasn't,.
He asserts that the parkour was "all real", and the hacking/deception was "mostly real." The combat was "real in the sense that someone had to do all that stuff in the video," but it was purposely scripted that way and seemingly didn't work well if deviated from.
It wasn't fake. That was debunked.
just thought you had more shame, but still trying to defend. there's literally nothing left to defend mate.
no killzone 2? killzone 2 was always going to have a finished product at least. this was always, very obviously, not gameplay.
he didn't debunk anything though, I read what he said when you posted it:Defend? my guy a developer working on the game has come out to debunk the 'faked' thing.
Never mind I asked, just leave the obligatory emoji and be done with it, lol.
At the end Killzone 2 was released and even in a better state then the fake trailer sony showed at E3.He's describing things in the trailer being playable even if all marks weren't hit.
How can anyone still say it was all faked footage, lol.
This isn't Killzone 2 level of bullshittery we're talking about here.
This isn't Killzone 2 level of bullshittery we're talking about here.
He definitely looks like the type of man I would expect at a Sony owned studio these days.I think that guy was at insomniac before joining the initiative, but I guess he smelled all Phil's bullshit and went back to insomniac.