From a technical standpoint? Yes.. still virgins.
You could have 1,000 hours of intense foreplay including ejaculation and still "technically" be a virgin.. or you could be a guy, who 2 pump chumped one girl in the dark. and had zero other sexual interactions, and not "technically" be a virgin.
So it's sort of a pointless designation in some ways.. unless.. you don't want it to be, then you are probably better off sticking to the "technical" definition, if you are straight at least. In communicating with someone else describing yourself as a non-virgin has a particular meaning.. my "contextual" point had more to do with the idea that homosexuals who don't engage in heterosexual sex will never "technically" not be virgins.. so the word becomes meaningless, or subjective.. so why not make it be subjective for straight people as well at that point?