• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

What's a good topic for discussion in class?

Status
Not open for further replies.

J2 Cool

Member
So I have to pick some kind of topic that's going to spark debate in class on Friday, and head the discussion. Anything from the beginning of the school year till now. People have done stuff about Terri Schiavo, Casinos, baseball steroids, violence, drug use, etc, etc. Anyway, I'd love to find something entertaining that'll make people argue. Possible options, of course there's the student/teacher sex running rampant across the nation, Bulls making the playoffs, and the next gen console war.... *shakes head* Any real suggestions for this thing? Open to the bizarre, the heated, or whichever. Just need a good one.
 

J2 Cool

Member
etiolate said:
The classic: "What is art?"

heh, "The question's been in the air a long damn time, and sure as hell was there at the beginning of the school year. Today, we must solve it". I think "Batman Begins: Is it gonna rock or what?!" would be a good one also.
 
D

Deleted member 4784

Unconfirmed Member
Illegal immigration and the fiscal impact it is having on this nation and our agricultural capital (California)? I see more people in support of illegals than against them, surprisingly enough.

Bush's plans for social security and his blatant disregard for what we really have to be worrying about: Medicare and Medicaid?

How about Affirmative Action? I need a 4.0 to get into an ABA approved program but Hispanics only need a 2.5; reverse racism much?
 

AstroLad

Hail to the KING baby
Religion: Which is the One True Faith?

kent5.jpg
 

whytemyke

Honorary Canadian.
Dude, present a scientific explanation as to the collapse of the relationship between Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston. Make it sound all intelligent and stuff.

Then yell "ANGELINA YOU WHORE!" and run outta the classroom crying.
 

BuddyC

Member
Media conglomeration is always interesting, but gets brought up a lot in these situations. Still, there's nothing like a good old conspiracy theory.

If you want to be quirky and original, you could try "Should I break up with my girlfriend?"

That could actually be a lot of fun, especially if you include some stereotypical reasoning like "she doesn't put out." Be careful though, success would be highly dependent on a) your abilities and b) the participation of the class.
 

J2 Cool

Member
Mike, both them have been covered. And yeah, they had some girls in serious rage :lol On participation, the class gets into it from time to time. Like, today I had to do some breakdown of rebellion in a creative way. Song, article, skit. So I storyboarded the rebellious coming of age story, of a hooker named Nancy and a supehero with a split personality disorder. That went off well, as I got a seat to sit in front with, and took them through the story. We did have one of those teachers who sits in the back and takes notes though. I was like "shiiiit, how am I supposed to do this now". I made sure to get the requirements afterward though, by breaking down the hooker's thought process, as well as traits the characters developed by the end.

For this, I need to do the same, get the requirements. Which basically states that it has to be some current issue, accompanied by an article. And we have to have questions ready for the class. About 15 minutes of discussion is good, more depending on how into it they get. But yeah, I'm just looking for something that'll not bore the hell out of me and the class.
 

BuddyC

Member
Hmm, do the Brad and Jennifer thing, but use the perspective of Angelina Jolie approaching their broken marriage.

Introduce it by saying that you recently met a girl but she's taken. Then list all of the problems/reasons Brad and Angelina got together. Let them debate it for a bit, what you should do, see if someone mentions that it sounds like an inversion of the Brad/Jennifer/Jolie thing. If they don't, reveal this towards the end.

If you need to stretch, bring up that celebrities are larger than life, marketed so that people want to be them, and the affect their actions (the split) will have on their views on the culture. Are people more likely to be accepting of divorce/breaking up a marriage now?
 

Hooker

Member
Addictions, why isn't weed legal. Then bring up the studies of it being way less harmful and addicting then alcohol, coffee and tobacco etc. (which you can consider hard-drugs) About weed never killed anyone and DIU every hour of the day.

The pharmacutical purposes of weed etc.

When they come with the addict/druggies argument, tell about Netherlands (Amsterdam, if they can't connect the dots) and how the situation is here.

You can do it :p
 

BuddyC

Member
Hooker said:
About weed never killed anyone and DIU every hour of the day.
This one always gets me going. "But it wasn't the alcohol that caused the DUI, it was the effects of the alcohol on the body that led to the accident! Can you prove that no individual has ever killed somone due to the effects of marijuana? A kid has never been driving and slammed on his brakes a bit too late because he was stoned?"
 

Hooker

Member
Short anwser: "no - next question"


I like to over emphasize, you can naunce it with "not as many". Or let the one asking the question bring up some sort of article where it says someone got killed because s/he was stoned.

You're right about the effects of alcohol instead of the alcohol itself. Poor wording on my part. (Still early, just woke up :p)
 

maharg

idspispopd
There is a big difference between "there is no established and proven example of a causal relationship between X and Y" and "X has never caused Y." Has anyone ever been in an accident while stoned? Can you prove that the incidence of accidents-causing-death in people who are stoned is the same as that for the general, non-high, population?

If not, then it's really not possible to say that it has never caused an accident in an air-tight way. And in an essay, the goal is to PROVE your statements, not to let them flail out there like they mean something when they don't.

The fact is, the logic behind the ban on drinking and driving is based on a statistical link between accidents in people who drink and drive as compared to people who don't. Until a study shows up demonstrating something different for pot, that is a very difficult position to take. And the fact is, until pot is legal, doing research on people who drive stoned will be very very difficult to do in a way that is actually useful. So using it as a supporting argument for legalization of pot is circular.
 

Rorschach

Member
http://www.duiblog.com/2004/12/14

It is against the law to drive while under the influence of marijuana. It has always been assumed that cannabis, like alcohol, impairs the perception, coordination, reflexes and judgment necessary for the safe operation of a motor vehicle. And, of course, there have been governmental studies addressing the question: Does marijuana impair driving? Interestingly, however, the findings do not necessarily support popular opinion....

On the one hand, the California Department of Justice has found that marijuana undoubtedly impairs psychomotor abilities that are functionally related to driving and that driving skills may be impaired, particularly at high-dose levels or among inexperienced users. "Marijuana and Alcohol: A Driver Performance Study", California Office of Traffic Safety Project No. 087902 (Sept. 1986).

Contradicting these conclusions, however, are two federal studies.

The U.S. Department of Transportation conducted research with a fully interactive simulator on the effects of alcohol and marijuana, alone and in combination, on driver-controlled behavior and performance. Although alcohol was found consistently and significantly to cause impairment, marijuana had only an occasional effect. Also, there was little evidence of interaction between alcohol and marijuana. Accidents and speeding tickets reliably increased with alcohol, but no marijuana or combined alcohol-marijuana influence was noted. "The Effects of Alcohol on Driver-Controlled Behavior in a Driving Simulator, Phase I", DOT-HS-806-414.

A more recent report entitled "Marijuana and Actual Performance", DOT-HS-808-078, noted that "THC is not a profoundly impairing drug....It apparently affects controlled information processing in a variety of laboratory tests, but not to the extent which is beyond the individual’s ability to control when he is motivated and permitted to do so in driving".

The study concluded that: "...An important practical objective of this study was to determine whether degrees of driving impairment can be actually predicted from either measured concentration of THC in plasma or performance measured in potential roadside "sobriety" tests of tracking ability or hand and posture stability. The results, like many reported before, indicated that none of these measures accurately predicts changes in actual performance under the influence of THC...".

The researchers found that it "appears not possible to conclude anything about a driver’s impairment on the basis of his/her plasma concentrations of THC and THC-COOH determined in a single sample".

Note: "THC" stands for Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, which is the intoxicating ingredient in marijuana. THC is fairly quickly converted by the body into inert metabolites, which can stay in the body for hours or even days. It is these metabolites that police blood tests in DUI arrests detect and measure. In other words, (1) marijuna may not impair driving ability at all, and (2) the blood "evidence" only measures an inactive substance which may have been there for days.

I guess studies are legally done on local and federal levels.
 

Alucard

Banned
The two easiest things to argue and that will get people to become really passionate:

Abortion and capital punishment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom