• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

White Nationalist charged with assault says Trump told him to do it

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...mes-trump-campaign-rally-assault-suit-n747641

A white nationalist accused of assaulting three protesters at a Donald Trump campaign rally last year alleged the president authorized him to remove disruptive people when he said "Get 'em out of here," court papers filed Monday say.

Matthew Heimbach, of the Traditionalist Worker Party, became the second defendant named in a March 30 lawsuit alleging Trump incited the assault to use the president's own words as a defense.

"Heimbach relied on Trump's authority to order disruptive persons removed and that Trump was legally within his rights to ask other attendees to assist in defending their constitutional rights," the documents say.

If Heimbach is found liable in the suit, the documents say, Trump should indemnify him.

Another defendant, 75-year-old Alvin Bamberger, offered a similar argument in court papers filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for Western Kentucky.

Heimbach denied the charges of assault, battery and other allegations, the documents say.

Trump's lawyers sought to dismiss the March 30 suit, arguing the president didn't mean for his supporters to use force during the March 1, 2016 rally in Louisville, Kentucky.

Judge David J. Hale rejected that claim, ruling there was considerable evidence linking the protesters' injuries to Trump's actions.

The Southern Poverty Law Center describes Heimbach's Traditionalist Worker Party as "a white nationalist group that advocates for racially pure nations and communities and blames Jews for many of the world's problems."
Click to expand...
 
B

Brawly Likes to Brawl

Member
The most disturbing thing about this story is that they aren't wrong. Trump did egg his supporters on to attack protestors at his rallies. It was one of the most upsetting aspects of his campaign.
 
G

Gattsu25

Banned
CarpeDeezNutz said:
Can that be used as evidence?
Click to expand...
Pretty sure it was:
"Trump's lawyers sought to dismiss the March 30 suit, arguing the president didn't mean for his supporters to use force during the March 1, 2016 rally in Louisville, Kentucky.

"Judge David J. Hale rejected that claim, ruling there was considerable evidence linking the protesters' injuries to Trump's actions."​
 
W

WedgeX

Banned
Gattsu25 said:
Pretty sure it was:
"Trump's lawyers sought to dismiss the March 30 suit, arguing the president didn't mean for his supporters to use force during the March 1, 2016 rally in Louisville, Kentucky.

"Judge David J. Hale rejected that claim, ruling there was considerable evidence linking the protesters' injuries to Trump's actions."​
Click to expand...

Good. It was a scary turn for American politics. There are consequences for the American public when politicians say things like that.
 
B

bionic77

Member
This guy's lawyer should have read the constitution before he filed this baseless lawsuit.

I have it on good authority that you cannot sue the President of the United States.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

  • Locked
[TNYT] Brazil Blocks X After Musk Ignores Court Orders
Social News Community 2
69
4K
ManaByte replied
  • Locked
Elon Musk vs Brazil’s Federal Supreme Court
Social Opinion News
12
2K
AJUMP23 replied
Big Business and Government: Grand conspiracy or ramblings of a mad man?
3
2K
Soodanim replied
No Job, Loads of Debt: Covid Upends Middle-Class Family Finances - WSJ
Social
17
3K
daveonezero replied
  • Locked
Trump Supporter Asscued of Assault at Rally: Trump said to do it.
2
60
14K
E-Cat replied
Top Bottom