And so important that they force Matlock to eschew reality in order to comment on the users who are interested in them!Matlock said:Wow, NPD numbers are so fucking important that I can eschew reality to get meaningless sales data to back my meaningless posts.
Yeah, for posting that thread with the "Top 10 Uses For A GC In 2005" or something like that.Justin Bailey said:bunkum is banned?
human5892 said:Yeah, for posting that thread with the "Top 10 Uses For A GC In 2005" or something like that.
human5892 said:And so important that they force Matlock to eschew reality in order to comment on the users who are interested in them!
Meier said:Wait, so someone who is actually important and provides the forum with an invaluable service posts a GC troll post and is banned, but people who once wrote for GAF or are just snarky journalists can do it with impunity? Sounds fair.
Yeah -- it was a stupid thread and all, but given some of the other things that are said around here sometimes (about all platforms, not just GC), I don't think it was ban-worthy, especially since (AFAIK) bunkum wasn't on the "black list" for anything previously.Meier said:Wait, so someone who is actually important and provides the forum with an invaluable service posts a GC troll post and is banned, but people who once wrote for GAF or are just snarky journalists can do it with impunity? Sounds fair.
FUCKhuman5892 said:Yeah, for posting that thread with the "Top 10 Uses For A GC In 2005" or something like that.
border said:Yeah, nobody that has access to the data is going to be able to post it. I wouldn't be getting all excited, if I were you...
Wasn't Bunkum's "Top 10" thread just a cut n' paste from some lame website? I don't think he should really get banned for that...
bitwise said:banned for a month too! haha.
But don't worry, Mike Works promised he would be posting the NPD numbers himself instead this month.
or some unbiased new blood, like meWario64 said:This forum needs new uncorrupted mods. Like me. Heehaa