AC6 is what I would nominate for goty. It not actually not broken, and not a repeat of what came before.Let me guess - the OP loves TOTK
Armored Core 6AC6 is what I would nominate for goty. It not actually not broken, and not a repeat of what came before.
Yep, same here.They dropped the first big patch today, apparently fixing 1000 things. Next patch will work on performance. No doubt they’ll have most of the problems sorted by the time I reach Act 3. I’m 15 hours and have no idea how much of Act 1 is left. There’s so much good stuff, it never lets up.
Are you kidding? I've waited 6 years for the game, i wanna play it NOW.Who would play this before waiting around a few years anyway
Exactly. My favourite game of all time is a buggy mess (Skyrim). If the game's good, the game's good. Doesn't excuse missing content that was promised, of course. But I'll take that any day over mtx, season passes and other predatory BS.Welp, Larian is about to be cancelled. Somehow some fucktards has found something wrong with a game without microtransactions and all the other shit thats in a modern game. So now it has to die.
Where the hell did you read that? So far people counted 15 'full endings' not counting variations for each, with possibly more still being left out.
What's a few more years then ?Are you kidding? I've waited 6 years for the game, i wanna play it NOW.
You'll be playing Starfield because BG3 has bugs? The dichotomy of gaming right hereI’ll be stuck in Starfield soon anyway so once I’m ready for BG3 it’ll hopefully be polished up well.
No I’ll be playing Starfield because I want to play Starfield and I doubt I’ll have time to play anything else for awhile, Larian have time to sort this out from my perspective.You'll be playing Starfield because BG3 has bugs? The dichotomy of gaming right here
What i meant is that you choose to play Starfield, knowing Bethesda games history with bugs, but leave BG3 to later because you want to leave Larian to fix the bugs.No I’ll be playing Starfield because I want to play Starfield and I doubt I’ll have time to play anything else for awhile, Larian have time to sort this out from my perspective.
So you have an amazing time for 80 hours and then there's a few bug, you answered your own question. I mean those crafty bastards, giving us some of the best 80 hours any game in recent memory has had in order to expertly hide those bugs and trick us. How dare they.so people could only see the problem after they played like 80 hours.
And the funny thing is that before The Witcher II CD project was seen as one of the worst developers ever (PC port of Saints Row 2 and Dark Sector anyone?)Larian is the new 'darling' of the videogame community. This is CD Projekt Red hype all over again.
Why would you mention that game in a thread to a game completely unrelated?Let me guess - the OP loves TOTK
So you have an amazing time for 80 hours and then there's a few bug, you answered your own question. I mean those crafty bastards, giving us some of the best 80 hours any game in recent memory has had in order to expertly hide those bugs and trick us. How dare they.
It’s not about the bugs I just want to play Starfield more and don’t have time to play both now, it just plays out well this time that the bugs talked about here will likely have been erased til I’m ready for it.What i meant is that you choose to play Starfield, knowing Bethesda games history with bugs, but leave BG3 to later because you want to leave Larian to fix the bugs.
I have no doubt there's tons of issues and bugs in act3, but they're already working on it and released several fixes with more to come. I'm sure it sucks for those that reached act3 early, but most people haven't yet and everything in the 60 hours I've played so far has been great with minimal issues other than performance in certain areas. Very ambitious projects from small developers will have bugs, I was fully aware of it when I bought the game and so far I've been impressed by how few I've found. A game doesn't need to be a technical masterpiece for people to love it, when something is very good and resonates with you it can overcome its shortcomings. Otherwise the only type of game reviews we would have would be of the technical kind and any game running at 30fps would instantly get a below average score which isn't really the case.It's not '' a few bugs '' and don't pretend like a bad ending can't compromise the experience ( remember Mass Effect 3? ).
Especially when it comes to replaying, this isn't even getting into all of the cut content that they were literally marketing only two months ago.
In June Swen was talking about Upper City and hyping it up as this amazing section of the game, meanwhile in the '' finished game '' it's not even there at all and dataminers have confirmed that it was meant to be and that it was cut...
There's a ton of game breaking bugs, have fun spending 80 hours and then your favorite companion just literally doesn't work and doesn't trigger dialogues and their scenes at the end don't show or play incorrectly.
In the last sections of the game I ran into so many bugs it made me want to stop playing it legit upset me the drop in quality is completely jarring compared to act 1.
I had to do the last boss like 10 times over because the end turn just wouldn't work and I got stuck repeatedly and that wasn't even the worst I ran into.
It's not really 80 hours of quality hours either, just because you spend 80 hours on a game doesn't mean that all of those hours were enjoyable.
The game has a lot of very high highs, but it also has a lot of boring stuff and filler and quite frankly the combat is not very fun beyond a certain point because the game clearly wasn't play-tested and it was too easy and becomes very tedious.
The ai is also one of the worst I've seen in gaming in a very long time in act 3 it's just broken.
Agreed, I don’t even understand how someone can think that. It’s actually a fairly rare thing for me to even finish long open world RPGs, I always explore and start doing side stuff and forget about the main quest and eventually want to try a different character. It’s a wonder I finished Elden Ring 3 times.As for the ending thing, I'm personally of the opinion that an ending alone can't ruin a game if you've had a great time until then.
2. Missing an epilouge (the claim of 17K endings is only four).
Then yes, OP is spreading FUD. Go on youtube right now, type "BG3 Endings" and see 2 hours compilations with tons of different endings, its even possible to end the game in Act 2 with some decisions.Read the OP
"2. Missing an epilouge (the claim of 17K endings is only four)."
Is the OP spreading FUD and or are you still correct?
Larian is the new 'darling' of the videogame community. This is CD Projekt Red hype all over again.
My friends this is reviewed as the berst game of all times never played it but a CRPG with bugs is the best game of all time I cant evenGame alone is fantastic as cyberpunk was. Marketing i can blame, but assuming there no info and game just released both would deserve a lot of praise.
Technical issues on last gen aside. This was a travesty.
The games in their core are fantastic and among the best. I hope both games will be build upon for years to come.
Just dont get hyped people and read as little as you can as marketing will disappoint you in the end. It should not be like this but it should not diminish the games and what the developers have done. Still fantastic.
You guys are complaining that the 5%-10% of missing contents makes the 90% not excellent, it does not. Yes i would want more and better, but what was delivered is still among the best in video games. Better than 99% of game releases. That counts as something right? Could it have been better, of course. But there is always something that can be improved no matter what you do. The bits that are not there doesnt mean the game cannot be celebrated.
How marketing made it look vs reality is terrible and they should get the blame.
Core production people still gave us top notch entertainment.
My friends are liking it more than the BotW DLC that came out earlier this year.My friends this is reviewed as the berst game of all times never played it but a CRPG with bugs is the best game of all time I cant even
A perfectly polished game thats worse is still worse then a great game even if it has bugs.My friends this is reviewed as the berst game of all times never played it but a CRPG with bugs is the best game of all time I cant even
My friends this is reviewed as the berst game of all times never played it but a CRPG with bugs is the best game of all time I cant even
I can kinda get this response, because 17K unique ending Is very unrealistic, but there is no epilogue or ending slides, so the choices you have don't even get expounding on for a resolution Ala new vegas style. The 4 endings is really just the mind flayer, no mind flayer and good or evil variant from what I understand. You could have been more charitable though. Moreso, the BS marketing is what annoyed me on that more than anything else, as they slapped the figure everywhere.You cannot seriously be stupid enough to have posted this.
I have no doubt there's tons of issues and bugs in act3, but they're already working on it and released several fixes with more to come. I'm sure it sucks for those that reached act3 early, but most people haven't yet and everything in the 60 hours I've played so far has been great with minimal issues other than performance in certain areas. Very ambitious projects from small developers will have bugs, I was fully aware of it when I bought the game and so far I've been impressed by how few I've found. A game doesn't need to be a technical masterpiece for people to love it, when something is very good and resonates with you it can overcome its shortcomings. Otherwise the only type of game reviews we would have would be of the technical kind and any game running at 30fps would instantly get a below average score which isn't really the case.
You didn't even played the game mate. The people i know who got there all liked act3, described it as one of the biggest cities they ever saw in a rpg to the point of overwhelming them, not in size but in depth, some spending more time there than they spent on any other act. Its not an "unfinished mess", its at worst "not as good as the previous two acts".This is VERBATIM, the cyberpunk defense force argument, just switch ACT3 for CDPR on consoles. I am glad you enjoyed the game, but this is just defending delivering undercooked unfinished products, which not something I am about.
They never said unique, they said variations. Also, your claim on OP saying the game only really has 4 endings is a straight up, easily verifiable LIE. You can easily go on youtube to confirm this.I can kinda get this response, because 17K unique ending Is very unrealistic, but there is no epilogue or ending slides, so the choices you have don't even get expounding on for a resolution Ala new vegas style. The 4 endings is really just the mind flayer, no mind flayer and good or evil variant from what I understand. You could have been more charitable though. Moreso, the BS marketing is what annoyed me on that what more than anything else, as they slapped the figure everywhere.