Will Netflix allow the sequel to Hogwarts Legacy?

af6ood.jpg
 
I think the message that woke = financial ruin has been well and truly passed.

People seem to me to have very little idea of how long it takes from greenlight to release for anything, and that change isn't reflected instantly.
 
What is the point of buying WB if you're going to leave their larger IPs to rot? If that is the strategy someone else will buy them in a couple of years anyways.
 
Then how do you explain everything else they do?

They didn't liked the witcher money?

Netflix is in constant conflict between "the message" and collecting money. They make money thanks to increased prices of subs on loyal customers and ending of account sharing, not because their original shows actually draw new customers (they even stopped reporting subs this year, focused on revenue). Same goes for Disney, they had money making machine (star Wars) and completely fucked it up because they wanted to push their agenda.

But I think dropping this amount of money will force them to earn as much as they can (and as quickly as they can) so I doubt they will kill Hogwarts Legacy 2 because they don't like Rowling.
 
Harry Potter is one of the IPs that Netflix explicitly mentioned in their press release about the buyout:

"Our mission has always been to entertain the world," said Ted Sarandos, co-CEO of Netflix. "By combining Warner Bros.' incredible library of shows and movies—from timeless classics like Casablanca and Citizen Kane to modern favorites like Harry Potter and Friends—with our culture-defining titles like Stranger Things, KPop Demon Hunters and Squid Game, we'll be able to do that even better. Together, we can give audiences more of what they love and help define the next century of storytelling."


They're not going to memory hole it when it's one of their stated reasons for purchasing WB in the first place.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
I think if Netflix does get Warner they're going to shut the game division down entirely
or will just become a bunch of mobile trash
 
Late stage capitalism says...yeahhhhh buddy!

I think the problem opponents of J.K. Rowling have here is the content itself is not a problem. It's family-friendly entertainment, even including LGBTQ characters in the game. Finding a real-life person's political views objectionable doesn't mean the things they created in the past are objectionable.
 
Last edited:
Money has no gender. It has no smell, no color, no ideology. And that's the point. Netflix and similar platforms are swimming in money, so I really don't see how they could seriously block the development of a potential blockbuster.

They'll make the usual surface-level statements just to make it appealing to everyone, and honestly, that's probably for the best. At least it keeps all that forced ideological nonsense — identity politics, quotas, and whatever trend of the moment — out of the video game industry.
 
Top Bottom