NeOak
Member
I am actually questioning if Ghost in the Shell, which I think was just as "good" as Blade, was not only panned because of the racial controversy, but also because of the lead being a woman.
Thatsbait.gif
I am actually questioning if Ghost in the Shell, which I think was just as "good" as Blade, was not only panned because of the racial controversy, but also because of the lead being a woman.
I am actually questioning if Ghost in the Shell, which I think was just as "good" as Blade, was not only panned because of the racial controversy, but also because of the lead being a woman.
I haven't seen Blade Runner but I'm sure it is better than The Foreigner, which was pretty much hot garbage. I don't know what the marketing is like for that movie in America, but I've gotta imagine the reviews will be bad and word of mouth will be bad as well. I guess bad movies have topped the charts before though so anything is possible.
I doubt this financial failure will do any harm to Villenueve's career considering the raving reviews the movie got. You can't really blame Denis for the audience not digging a great movie.That's actually a horrible opening for Blade Runner 2049, and what a crying shame. It was a great film. Now I'm assuming Villenueve will have to make a studio film just to pay for the films failure, maybe he can do a James Bond film like he wants to do. Eh!!!
Reviews are just starting to trickle in. Currently at 80% after 5 reviews. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_foreigner_2017
They walked out? Dam.
People bawling over BR2049's failure like it's the creative death of hollywood while pretending the other 20 independent movies in theaters right now that would kill to make $13 million in a day don't exist.
If your theater has it, go see Loving Vincent pls k thx bye.
Domestic success is the most important in Hollywood since the studios get most out of the $. I think it's something like 80% of each dollar profit. On contrast the studio only get like 30% of each dollar a movie makes in China. So domestic is very, very important.Even with a 150$m budget, 80m internationally doesn't seem like a huge flop to me.
It'll all depend on word of mouth and China - and word of mouth seems mostly fine?
Sure, the movie won't be making 400m and somehow get into sequel territory, but I could see it scraping at 300m at the end and almost making back it's money in cinemas.
Not a success but not nearly the kind of bomb we've seen so far this year or in the last few years.
I was really surprised to see the Sony logo in the beginning and having a movie this big without the time square or otherwise butchered by them.
Domestic success is the most important in Hollywood since the studios get most out of the $. I think it's something like 80% of each dollar profit. On contrast the studio only get like 30% of each dollar a movie makes in China. So domestic is very, very important.
Even with a 150$m budget, 80m internationally doesn't seem like a huge flop to me.
It'll all depend on word of mouth and China - and word of mouth seems mostly fine?
Sure, the movie won't be making 400m and somehow get into sequel territory, but I could see it scraping at 300m at the end and almost making back it's money in cinemas.
Not a success but not nearly the kind of bomb we've seen so far this year or in the last few years.
I was really surprised to see the Sony logo in the beginning and having a movie this big without the time square or otherwise butchered by them.
It's not out for another month here.Not that I have my finger on the pulse of the Chinese market or anything, but I doubt Blade Runner does big numbers here. I haven't seen any advertising for Blade Runner in China. The subway stations around me still have tons of ads for Baby Driver up for some reason. From what I've heard Blade Runner is pretty slow moving, these kinds of movies don't tend to do that great with Chinese audiences. They like special effects and explosions and action from their English language films generally.
It's not out for another month here.
Not that I have my finger on the pulse of the Chinese market or anything, but I doubt Blade Runner does big numbers here. I haven't seen any advertising for Blade Runner in China. The subway stations around me still have tons of ads for Baby Driver up for some reason. From what I've heard Blade Runner is pretty slow moving, these kinds of movies don't tend to do that great with Chinese audiences. They like special effects and explosions and action from their English language films generally.
Sure, but I doubt its gonna do big numbers when it does come out. And the big movies, like Marvel and Transformers have ads all over the place it seems like for ages before they come out here.
What do you think though? Seems like something Chinese will like to you?
A couple in the same line as me were actually snoring lol. I also saw 4 people walking out.
I liked the movie but I dont see the brilliance behind it tbh. It was a standard sci fi movie with tons of cliches.
I am actually questioning if Ghost in the Shell, which I think was just as "good" as Blade, was not only panned because of the racial controversy, but also because of the lead being a woman.
I dont think legs will save the film but we will see.
Hmm. International numbers for Blade Runner seem fine, so far.
If it manages near Interstellar numbers that would be stellar (sorrynotsorry) for Sony. That one did $487,100,000 internationally, over 72% of its total revenue was international. But that remains to be seen.
Sure, but I doubt its gonna do big numbers when it does come out. And the big movies, like Marvel and Transformers have ads all over the place it seems like for ages before they come out here.
What do you think though? Seems like something Chinese will like to you?
I thought they were on the hook for P&A, Deadline disagrees with that assertion so I've adjusted accordingly:WB didn't invest much to distribute it domestically. Most of the budget came from Sony and Alcon. So no, it's not flopping for WB.
Warner didn't invest in Blade Runner, it was financed by Alcon and Sony.Yeah, I know - but isn't this a special case with the shared publishing rights?
I simply cannot believe that Warner thought to make back on a 150$ budget in the US alone. Or even half of that. They knew what they had with this movie and they even had GitS as a reference point in a similar genre from earlier this year.
Could this be a case of blowing up the budget late in the game to use it to write off some other costs?
I don't know really. I would say that it might do okish but jot great. If its sold as a bog sci fi flick that is. I mean Valerian did pretty well but it was helped by being starved for western releases after the summer.Sure, but I doubt its gonna do big numbers when it does come out. And the big movies, like Marvel and Transformers have ads all over the place it seems like for ages before they come out here.
What do you think though? Seems like something Chinese will like to you?
I thought they were on the hook for P&A, Deadline disagrees with that assertion so I've adjusted accordingly:
It's bombing for Alcon.
Warner didn't invest in Blade Runner, it was financed by Alcon and Sony.
Due to the financing agreement I doubt that they inflated the budget as a write off.
Alcon bought the rights in 2011, they're closely affiliated with Warner (virtually all their films have been distributed by them). However it seems like Warner didn't want to invest in Blade Runner, and Sony seems to want to get into the Villeneuve business (see: Cleopatra, and my pet theory is that they still have the Bond rights and want him for the job. I can dream, can't I?).How did this publishing deal come across anyhow?
Warner and Sony don't seem to strike me as companies that are that desperate to revive a 30 year old IP in tandem...
Blade Runner Interstellar
Australia $3,518,047 $3,622,811
Finland $527,808 $391,433
Italy $2,340,495 $3,604,199
Netherlands $791,329 $868,376
New Zealand $588,899 $527,865
In the year 2000!
Either this or Fast 9 is going to collapse like Transformers: The Last Knight and way under perform.
In the year 2000!
So because I can't sleep I did more some more crunching on the Interstellar comparison offered earlier in the thread:
(Interstellar did $487,100,000 internationally, over 72% of its total take was international)Code:Blade Runner Interstellar Australia $3,518,047 $3,622,811 Finland $527,808 $391,433 Italy $2,340,495 $3,604,199 Netherlands $791,329 $868,376 New Zealand $588,899 $527,865
Well, that's not conclusive. But it's not bombing everywhere at least.
I just can't wait till they go to Space.
The dream is dead, folks.
Sylvester Stallone is directing Creed 2.
Expect to see baby Dolph and Donny battling it out for the fate of their fathers.
Also, over or under $200 million for Last Jedi's opening weekend? I'm going with the over here.
So because I can't sleep I did more some more crunching on the Interstellar comparison offered earlier in the thread:
(Interstellar did $487,100,000 internationally, over 72% of its total take was international)Code:Blade Runner Interstellar Australia $3,518,047 $3,622,811 Finland $527,808 $391,433 Italy $2,340,495 $3,604,199 Netherlands $791,329 $868,376 New Zealand $588,899 $527,865
Well, that's not conclusive. But it's not bombing everywhere at least.
Also, over or under $200 million for Last Jedi's opening weekend? I'm going with the over here.
Definitely over. Right now I'm thinking well over $200M but below TFA. Might revise closer to release depending on theater counts/IMAX share/round the clock showtimes/reviews.