Exactly. Nobody is ever going to top Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka.Not feeling it at all, you can't do Gene Wilder unless you are Gene Wilder, and they really need to explain who that kid is with him as it feels like a pretty big retcon having a side-kick who co-founded the company with him.
I would say of all the movie "Willy Wonkas", Depp was by far the worstNo johnny depp, no deal.
Crispin Glover was the best Willy Wonka.I would say of all the movie "Willy Wonkas", Depp was by far the worst
It was so bad I rated it as one of the worst movies I've ever seen.I would say of all the movie "Willy Wonkas", Depp was by far the worst
Looks like it will be hilarious to watch YouTube reviews by ragebait neckbeards
He was good in Dune, and the emo Pinnochio looks sexy. But he's not good when he tries to smile. He needs to look cool and broody all the time.First
Then
AND NOW??
WHAT A HELL HAPPEND TO THIS WORLD???
Make new things please. Not everything has to be a pre/sequel or remake. No one asked for a Willy Wonka origin story.
Didnt he ask for this?Hugh Grant as an oompa loompa, Dinklage is gonna be fucking pissed
Pretty cool that Willy Wonka apparently had an indentured servant that he cast away when he went straight to the source and got a bunch of slave Oompa Loompas.
That it's from the Paddington director is about the only saving grace going for it IMHO.
And how did WB get this? I thought Netflix paid like a bazillion dollars to just straight buy the Dahl estate?
Yeah, he’s not convincing as an eccentric. At all. Has the same energy as Zuck‘s smoked meats.Chalamet has been a good actor in past films but he seems miscast in this.
Yeah, he’s not convincing as an eccentric. At all. Has the same energy as Zuck‘s smoked meats.