• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

World's first malaria vaccination approved

Status
Not open for further replies.

Necrovex

Member
Aljazeera said:
The world's first malaria vaccine has received a green light from European drugs regulators who recommended it should be licensed for use in babies in Africa who are at risk of the mosquito-borne disease.

The shot, called RTS,S or Mosquirix, would be the first licensed human vaccine against a parasitic disease and could help prevent millions of cases of malaria in countries that use it.

The vaccine was developed by British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) in partnership with the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative,

Recommendations for a drug licence made by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) are normally endorsed by the European Commission within a couple of months.


Mission Malaria
Mosquirix, also part-funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, will also now be assessed by the World Health Organisation, which has promised to give its guidance on when and where it should be used before the end of this year.

Malaria killed an estimated 584,000 people in 2013, the vast majority of them in sub-Saharan Africa.

More than 80 percent of malaria deaths are in children under the age of five.

Andrew Witty, GSK's chief executive, said EMA's positive recommendation was a further important step towards making the world's first malaria vaccine available for young children.

"While RTS,S on its own is not the complete answer to malaria, its use alongside those interventions currently available such as bed nets and insecticides would provide a very meaningful contribution to controlling the impact of malaria on children in those African communities that need it the most," he said in a statement.

'Enormously significant '

Global health experts have long hoped scientists would be able to develop an effective malaria vaccine, and researchers at GSK have been working on RTS,S for 30 years.

Hopes that the shot would be the final answer to wiping out malaria were dampened when trial data released in 2011 and 2012 showed it only reduced episodes of malaria in babies aged 6-12 weeks by 27 percent, and by around 46 percent in children aged 5-17 months.

EMA's recommendation is that the shot should nevertheless be licensed for use in babies in the full age range covered in the trials - from 6 weeks to 17 months.

Some malaria specialists have expressed concern that the complexities and potential costs of deploying this first vaccine when it only provides partial protection make it less attractive and more risky.

However, Joe Cohen, a GSK scientist who has led the development of Mosquirix since 1987, said on Friday he had no doubt the vaccine could significantly reduce the toll of sickness and death caused by the malaria among African children.

"I have absolutely no reservations in terms of rolling this vaccine out," he told Reuters.

"Why? Because the efficacy, when translated into cases averted and deaths averted, is just tremendous. It will have an enormously significant public health impact."

I consider this one of the biggest public health related news of the year. This, in combination with other items, should significantly decrease the death rate. Based be to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for being a backer in this revelation. This is the first fantastic step in eradicating this disease.

Take away my malaria pills and vaccination if old.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/07/world-malaria-vaccination-approved-150724055510421.html
 

Jme

Member
This is amazing news! Good job to all the research scientists and Bill Gates' involved!
 

cameron

Member
Malaria killed an estimated 584,000 people in 2013, the vast majority of them in sub-Saharan Africa.

More than 80 percent of malaria deaths are in children under the age of five.

That is staggering.

I'm just reading now that Nigeria hasn't had a recorded polio case in one year. It should've happened sooner. Immunization efforts have been hampered by previous vaccination bans, fears from the public, and attacks on health workers. Eradicating malaria has to deal with all that plus non-human hosts.
 
Amazing. Some 30 years in the making. Millions dying in the meantime.

This could be really huge. It might help lower fertility rates because parents won't have to worry so much about losing their children.
 

dEvAnGeL

Member
Manuel Elkin Patarroyo, the man that started all, from my city, went to school with my father, i went to school with his nephew
 

Rebel Leader

THE POWER OF BUTTERSCOTCH BOTTOMS
Boom. Science is fucking awesome.

IMAAVqC.gif
 

geardo

Member
Considering that malaria is caused by a genus of intracellular parasites, I doubt a vaccine will ever be even close to 100% effective. We'll see though, there are plenty of smarter people out there than me.
 

Maniel

Banned
Considering that malaria is caused by a genus of intracellular parasites, I doubt a vaccine will ever be even close to 100% effective. We'll see though, there are plenty of smarter people out there than me.

I don't think any vaccines are 100% effective, but even just 30% effectiveness could save millions of lives. Also they will definitely become more effective as time goes on and new developments are made.
 
Considering that malaria is caused by a genus of intracellular parasites, I doubt a vaccine will ever be even close to 100% effective. We'll see though, there are plenty of smarter people out there than me.
IIRC H.flu is intracellular and the Hib vaccine is pretty effective, so there's precedence.
 

Concept17

Member
"Hopes that the shot would be the final answer to wiping out malaria were dampened when trial data released in 2011 and 2012 showed it only reduced episodes of malaria in babies aged 6-12 weeks by 27 percent, and by around 46 percent in children aged 5-17 months."

So, ~27-46% effective?
 

CodonAUG

Member
What is really exciting is that the vaccine's effectiveness will increase over time (to an extent) because as it reduces the total number of people with malaria, there ought to be less mosquitos that become carriers of malaria.
 

geardo

Member
I don't think any vaccines are 100% effective, but even just 30% effectiveness could save millions of lives. Also they will definitely become more effective as time goes on and new developments are made.

Sorry, didn't mean to infer that. No vaccine is 100% effective.

IIRC H.flu is intracellular and the Hib vaccine is pretty effective, so there's precedence.

hmm, you're right. I would caution that they are completely different types of organisms, but yeah, you're right. Maybe there is hope. Fuck Malaria.
 

RiverBed

Banned
I have so much respect and admiration for Bill Gates. The Gates foundation financed a lot, if not most, of the money for this huge project- not to mention all the amazing work he and his wife are doing in Africa.

And finally, Malaria could be another awful epidemic we can add to the museum list of disease we've solved/conquered. This is such great news, I'm shaking with excitement!
 
I don't think any vaccines are 100% effective, but even just 30% effectiveness could save millions of lives. Also they will definitely become more effective as time goes on and new developments are made.

I think the Smallpox vaccine was? There's a reason we were able to permanently eradicate it.
 

MultiCore

Member
I'd get a malaria vaccination, but with only 46% effectivity, I'd still have to take Doxy.

Still, malaria sucks.
 

Necrovex

Member
I'd get a malaria vaccination, but with only 46% effectivity, I'd still have to take Doxy.

Still, malaria sucks.

Oh man, I hate Doxy. Being forced to eat a big meal after taking it and not being precise with the taking the meds on time is difficult. Malarone has been a life saver in that regard. However I have read the virus has become resistant to these prophylaxes in some parts of the world.
 

darkace

Banned
I have a family friend who contracted malaria more than 20 years ago, and is still confined to bed for weeks every six months or so when the symptoms hit him badly. Malaria is a terrible disease, and this is great news.
 

Jawmuncher

Member
I hate Doxycycline so much. Not for what it prevents but if you accidentally take it on a empty stomach it's the worst.
 

MultiCore

Member
Oh man, I hate Doxy. Being forced to eat a big meal after taking it and not being precise with the taking the meds on time is difficult. Malarone has been a life saver in that regard. However I have read the virus has become resistant to these prophylaxes in some parts of the world.

I hate Doxycycline so much. Not for what it prevents but if you accidentally take it on a empty stomach it's the worst.


You know, I always take my doxy right before bed, and I've never had any problems. Been several years of doing that.
 

Nivash

Member
Just read about it in the Medscape News Alert this morning, excellent news! It comes with a Hepatitis B immunization as a bonus too.

It's unfortunate but not unexpected that it's not as effective as traditional vaccines:

"In a clinical trial in seven African nations, the new vaccine prevented a first or only clinical episode of malaria in 56% of children aged 5 to 17 months, and in 31% of children aged 6 to 12 weeks, according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The vaccine's effectiveness decreased after 1 year."

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/848608?src=wnl_edit_newsal&uac=164853AK&impID=770993&faf=1

Still, considering how terrible Malaria is, this is a huge leap forward. Reasonably cheap too: $5 for one dose or $20 for the recommended four doses. Might actually be affordable even to the poor people who actually need it, at least with some government subsidies or aid.
 

Jawmuncher

Member
You know, I always take my doxy right before bed, and I've never had any problems. Been several years of doing that.

Before bed I could see how you could get away with it. I would take it in the morning accidentally before breakfast and regret it for half the day.
 
Good to hear even if it doesn't seem to be a cure. At least there aren't anti-vaxxer crazies over there to stop such a significant medicine.
 

NekoFever

Member
What are the side effects on this one?

I heard existing malaria medicine has sometimes not-so-benign-side-effects?

I've never had so many side effect warnings as the malaria pills I had to take when I went to India. I was fortunate enough not to experience any but people in my party got dizzy, nauseated, etc.

Plus it was very expensive. You can see why they're looking for a cheaper way to prevent it.
 

Nivash

Member
What are the side effects on this one?

I heard existing malaria medicine has sometimes not-so-benign-side-effects?

It's a vaccine so not that many. Similar to the rabies vaccine. The usual things for the most part: a risk of getting a rash, fever and inflammation at the injection site. Some other adverse events like pneumonia and gastroenteritis were also reported during the trial but they're endemic to the area and didn't differ much compared to the control group.

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/760009_5

Standard anti-malaria drugs are nasty because they're anti-parasite drugs. They work by poisoning the parasite but they can't attack unique structures like they do against bacteria, so you get poisoned a bit along with the Malaria.
 

Ahasverus

Member
Before bed I could see how you could get away with it. I would take it in the morning accidentally before breakfast and regret it for half the day.
I know right haha I had it once before an exam with an empty stomach, it didn't go well.

You go scientists! Thank you very much. Also, fuck anti vaxxers. Suck it!
 

jetjevons

Bish loves my games!
I've never had so many side effect warnings as the malaria pills I had to take when I went to India. I was fortunate enough not to experience any but people in my party got dizzy, nauseated, etc.

I've been to India and to be fair that might have just been, well, India.
 

Scrooged

Totally wronger about Nintendo's business decisions.
Good to hear even if it doesn't seem to be a cure. At least there aren't anti-vaxxer crazies over there to stop such a significant medicine.

Did you miss the insanity during the ebola outbreak? People in the region do not trust the government at all and refused to be treated, going so far as to break infected people out of hospitals. Wouldn't be surprised if a sizable number won't let their babies be vaccinated.
 

Nivash

Member
Did you miss the insanity during the ebola outbreak? People in the region do not trust the government at all and refused to be treated, going so far as to break infected people out of hospitals. Wouldn't be surprised if a sizable number won't let their babies be vaccinated.

Those incidents were rare and hyped up in the media. The vast, vast vast majority of people did the sensible thing and got what treatment was available. If they hadn't the outbreak would still be out of control. The problem is that they either don't have access to or can't afford vaccines. A vaccine like this could make a massive difference and would for the most part be welcomed with open arms.

The only wide-spread and government sanctioned hysteria happened in the US.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom