Macam said:After seeing Batman Begins, comic book movies are dead to me. Do it right, or leave it alone.
![]()
That drawing is fucking awesome....Macam said:After seeing Batman Begins, comic book movies are dead to me. Do it right, or leave it alone.
![]()
={<SMOKE>}= said:batman begins was that bad?
Macam said:On the contrary, it was that good. The point was simply that other comic book movies don't stack up, so if you're not going to do it right (like the previous X-Men movies), I'd rather they leave it alone.
Mark my words, and track this god damn thread. Ratner will make X3 the best Xmen movie of them all.ManaByte said:Fuck Brett Ratner.
The only good thing he ever directed was the Jessica Simpson Dukes of Hazzard music video.
VictimOfGrief said:Mark my words, and track this god damn thread. Ratner will make X3 the best Xmen movie of them all.
You too will be owned Wilco. By next summer.... we shall see.Willco said:Someone get a tombstone and a chisel!
={<SMOKE>}= said:i thought that was what you were implying, but wasn't sure. and that drawing in your first post IS f'ing awesome. they need to give us a comic book movie that looks like that. imagine sin city with more color and cg effects that make the punisher's guns blast like that... why can't they get more 'artistic' with these movies instead of making them so 'realistic'?
VictimOfGrief said:You too will be owned Wilco. By next summer.... we shall see.
The fact that 3/4 of GAF already thinks that the movie will be shit because Ratner is directing is quite laughable. Track records in Hollywood (especially with franchise movies) don't mean a thing. Sure, it would've been nice to have everyone stay on that worked on the first two, but life goes on.Willco said:Be owned by what? In the realistic expectation that X-Men 3 will not be as good as the two previous installments, if it's good at all?
VictimOfGrief said:The fact that 3/4 of GAF already thinks that the movie will be shit because Ratner is directing is quite laughable. Track records in Hollywood (especially with franchise movies) don't mean a thing. Sure, it would've been nice to have everyone stay on that worked on the first two, but life goes on.
Quite frankly, I find it sad that most have written off Ratner as I purpose he's going to do a killer job.
Macam said:On the contrary, it was that good. The point was simply that other comic book movies don't stack up, so if you're not going to do it right (like the previous X-Men movies), I'd rather they leave it alone.
VictimOfGrief said:The fact that 3/4 of GAF already thinks that the movie will be shit because Ratner is directing is quite laughable. Track records in Hollywood (especially with franchise movies) don't mean a thing. Sure, it would've been nice to have everyone stay on that worked on the first two, but life goes on.
Quite frankly, I find it sad that most have written off Ratner as I purpose he's going to do a killer job.
ManaByte said:It's not just Ratner, it's the stupid plot of the movie.
ManaByte said:It's not just Ratner, it's the stupid plot of the movie.
Matlock said:That the screenwriters have denied.
Macam said:<rant>For me, I just tend to loathe the way they make all these movies follow the same mindless pattern. I don't mind the occasional popcorn movie like Blade, but they trot these things out annually with no real exploration of the characters. Granted, these are all largely superhero comics, but there's been some real substance that's come out of these series over the years that would add more weight and longevity to these franchises than simply cranking out some new special effects film. Hulk was close as anyone got to attempting to explore the characters closer up, but the movie itself wasn't terribly good by any stretch of the imagination (though I still enjoyed it for some reason). I'm dreading to see how they expand the X-Men's cardboard thin cast with X3. I think comic franchises offer up a pretty interesting film world to open up since given their long lineage, they can offer some interesting character exploration and build from film to film, similar to HBO's popular television series, but that won't ever happen given the costs.</rant>
![]()
Matlock said:That the screenwriters have denied.
Willco said:Spin control!
Moriarty has come out afterwards and said that it's basically spin control, even to go as low as to post on the SHH! forums. And he's got some credibility as he works in the movie industry and knows a lot of high level people. So I don't think he's lying. He's not some random Internet guy.
={<SMOKE>}= said:someone tell me the plot!
Who knows, the script review posted by AICN barely made mention of Wolverine. The focus seemed to be on other characters.Phoenix said:Is this going to be the Wolverine show that the poster suggests? Its like these directors/script writers find/create one popular character and then run him into the ground (ala Data from the next generation movies).
nomoment said:Why's Macam posting bad cover art at the end of each post?
nomoment said:BTW, cool that Astonishing X-Men #1 inspired that poster:
![]()
nomoment said:Why's Macam posting bad cover art at the end of each post?
VictimOfGrief said:The fact that 3/4 of GAF already thinks that the movie will be shit because Ratner is directing is quite laughable. Track records in Hollywood (especially with franchise movies) don't mean a thing. Sure, it would've been nice to have everyone stay on that worked on the first two, but life goes on.
Quite frankly, I find it sad that most have written off Ratner as I purpose he's going to do a killer job.
karasu said:Are you nuts? Track records mean everything. I can't think of any director who's known for mediocre schlock that magically escaped the stink of his own scent. Film is a directors medium, if it sucks, I blame him. His eye controls the outcome. It'll surely be full of really bold primary colors, and very loud, but good? No way.
ManaByte said:A bigger problem with Ratner is he knows jack shit about the material. He just wants to see his name on a big project like X-Men (or Superman before it).
When he was attached to Superman, he told LatinoReview that "Kids today don't know those movies; they were done 20 years ago. 10-year-old kids know SUPERMAN, but they don't know the mythology."
Except he didn't know anything about the Superman mythology because the disaster that was the JJ Abrams script he was going to direct had Kal-El and Lex Luthor being Kryptonian cousins, Krypton DOES NOT explode, the Superman suit is organic and it comes from a can, baby Clark beats up a rapist as he's raping Ma Kent, and Lex Luthor and Superman have a mid-air kung fu battle right out of The Matrix. Ratner called the script "Fucking awesome" in the interview.
DMczaf said:...........
Thank god for Singer.