X-Men 3 Teaser Poster (56K = out)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Borys

Banned
Searched for X-Men, Poster, sorry if old (I'm neither Mana nor Willco).

x329au.jpg


If ImageShack craps on me check it here on SuperHeroHype.
 
56k'ers can't take one 419KB image these days? Man, I knew it was rough, but I didn't know it was that rough.
 
There isnt anything wrong with it for teaser.

I like Ratner. Red Dragon, Rush Hour 1 and 2, and Money Talks are all pretty good movies.
 
I like Red Dragon alot, but that mainly just shows Ratner is quite capable at completely copying another person's style to make the film feel like part of a continuation (in that case Jonathan Demme's style from TSoTL).
 
I don't know why they are bothering making a Wolverine spin off, it seems to me that Xmen movies pretty much revolve around him anyway.
 
={<SMOKE>}= said:
batman begins was that bad?

On the contrary, it was that good. The point was simply that other comic book movies don't stack up, so if you're not going to do it right (like the previous X-Men movies), I'd rather they leave it alone.
 
Macam said:
On the contrary, it was that good. The point was simply that other comic book movies don't stack up, so if you're not going to do it right (like the previous X-Men movies), I'd rather they leave it alone.

i thought that was what you were implying, but wasn't sure. and that drawing in your first post IS f'ing awesome. they need to give us a comic book movie that looks like that. imagine sin city with more color and cg effects that make the punisher's guns blast like that... why can't they get more 'artistic' with these movies instead of making them so 'realistic'?
 
ManaByte said:
Fuck Brett Ratner.

The only good thing he ever directed was the Jessica Simpson Dukes of Hazzard music video.
Mark my words, and track this god damn thread. Ratner will make X3 the best Xmen movie of them all.
 
={<SMOKE>}= said:
i thought that was what you were implying, but wasn't sure. and that drawing in your first post IS f'ing awesome. they need to give us a comic book movie that looks like that. imagine sin city with more color and cg effects that make the punisher's guns blast like that... why can't they get more 'artistic' with these movies instead of making them so 'realistic'?

<rant>For me, I just tend to loathe the way they make all these movies follow the same mindless pattern. I don't mind the occasional popcorn movie like Blade, but they trot these things out annually with no real exploration of the characters. Granted, these are all largely superhero comics, but there's been some real substance that's come out of these series over the years that would add more weight and longevity to these franchises than simply cranking out some new special effects film. Hulk was close as anyone got to attempting to explore the characters closer up, but the movie itself wasn't terribly good by any stretch of the imagination (though I still enjoyed it for some reason). I'm dreading to see how they expand the X-Men's cardboard thin cast with X3. I think comic franchises offer up a pretty interesting film world to open up since given their long lineage, they can offer some interesting character exploration and build from film to film, similar to HBO's popular television series, but that won't ever happen given the costs.</rant>

28.jpg
 
VictimOfGrief said:
You too will be owned Wilco. By next summer.... we shall see.

Be owned by what? In the realistic expectation that X-Men 3 will not be as good as the two previous installments, if it's good at all?
 
Willco said:
Be owned by what? In the realistic expectation that X-Men 3 will not be as good as the two previous installments, if it's good at all?
The fact that 3/4 of GAF already thinks that the movie will be shit because Ratner is directing is quite laughable. Track records in Hollywood (especially with franchise movies) don't mean a thing. Sure, it would've been nice to have everyone stay on that worked on the first two, but life goes on.

Quite frankly, I find it sad that most have written off Ratner as I purpose he's going to do a killer job.
 
VictimOfGrief said:
The fact that 3/4 of GAF already thinks that the movie will be shit because Ratner is directing is quite laughable. Track records in Hollywood (especially with franchise movies) don't mean a thing. Sure, it would've been nice to have everyone stay on that worked on the first two, but life goes on.

Quite frankly, I find it sad that most have written off Ratner as I purpose he's going to do a killer job.

It's not just Ratner, it's the stupid plot of the movie.
 
Macam said:
On the contrary, it was that good. The point was simply that other comic book movies don't stack up, so if you're not going to do it right (like the previous X-Men movies), I'd rather they leave it alone.

oh good....cuz I was about to slap you
 
VictimOfGrief said:
The fact that 3/4 of GAF already thinks that the movie will be shit because Ratner is directing is quite laughable. Track records in Hollywood (especially with franchise movies) don't mean a thing. Sure, it would've been nice to have everyone stay on that worked on the first two, but life goes on.

Quite frankly, I find it sad that most have written off Ratner as I purpose he's going to do a killer job.

I don't think the movie will be bad because the director, but because it has two shitty writers and a bad studio suit putting the franchise on the fast track for a trainwreck. Ratner is so generic he can't do anything to help this situation.
 
Macam said:
<rant>For me, I just tend to loathe the way they make all these movies follow the same mindless pattern. I don't mind the occasional popcorn movie like Blade, but they trot these things out annually with no real exploration of the characters. Granted, these are all largely superhero comics, but there's been some real substance that's come out of these series over the years that would add more weight and longevity to these franchises than simply cranking out some new special effects film. Hulk was close as anyone got to attempting to explore the characters closer up, but the movie itself wasn't terribly good by any stretch of the imagination (though I still enjoyed it for some reason). I'm dreading to see how they expand the X-Men's cardboard thin cast with X3. I think comic franchises offer up a pretty interesting film world to open up since given their long lineage, they can offer some interesting character exploration and build from film to film, similar to HBO's popular television series, but that won't ever happen given the costs.</rant>

28.jpg


i agree, but i still think they could do some things visually and artistically to set these movies apart. also, in doing so, we could get the characters in the normal costumes and not the all black rubber/latex get-up most seem to get.

for me, sin city was awesome both visually and story-wise. the world was believable, but obviously not the one we live in. burton achieved this with the batman films to some degree, but obviously his version of gotham doesn't quite fit the comics.

also, while i didn't enjoy the hulk at all, i thought some of the editing where it was like comic panels was quite cool.

i guess all i'm saying is that a little artistic flair could help these movies be even truer to the comics. i think part of the problem is that they try and bring all of these stories/characters into our world and then they have to make sacrifices to the history/orgin by trying to ground everything in our reality.

as far as character development goes... to be honest, most people don't wanna go see a super-hero movie with great character development. they wanna go see shit get blown up and what not.
 
Matlock said:
That the screenwriters have denied.

Spin control!

Moriarty has come out afterwards and said that it's basically spin control, even to go as low as to post on the SHH! forums. And he's got some credibility as he works in the movie industry and knows a lot of high level people. So I don't think he's lying. He's not some random Internet guy.
 
Hey, I just call 'em like I see 'em. I'll wait until the film hits projectors until I start making judgements on it.:D
 
Willco said:
Spin control!

Moriarty has come out afterwards and said that it's basically spin control, even to go as low as to post on the SHH! forums. And he's got some credibility as he works in the movie industry and knows a lot of high level people. So I don't think he's lying. He's not some random Internet guy.

One of the movies he co-wrote is being produced by Fox.

={<SMOKE>}= said:
someone tell me the plot!

X-Men 3: The Secret of the Ooze.
 
Is this going to be the Wolverine show that the poster suggests? Its like these directors/script writers find/create one popular character and then run him into the ground (ala Data from the next generation movies).
 
Phoenix said:
Is this going to be the Wolverine show that the poster suggests? Its like these directors/script writers find/create one popular character and then run him into the ground (ala Data from the next generation movies).
Who knows, the script review posted by AICN barely made mention of Wolverine. The focus seemed to be on other characters.
 
Well, considering how they've already announced a Wolverine movie to follow X3, maybe they figured too much Wolvie would be a bad thing. Save some of it for his own movie.
 
Even if Ratner fucks it up I will not be able to blame him for it. The guy is being called in and within days of taking the job he's going to be shooting. No preproduction, no input, no anything. He has no idea what the previous ideas the other directors had for the material nor will he know why they made the decisions they did.

John Frankenheimer was in the same situation for Island of Doctor Moreau.

The script is one thing but making the movie is a whole other and imagine standing there at some set you didn't design, costumes you didn't approve, actors you didn't hire and you have to get something done! That is a tough position to be in.
 
VictimOfGrief said:
The fact that 3/4 of GAF already thinks that the movie will be shit because Ratner is directing is quite laughable. Track records in Hollywood (especially with franchise movies) don't mean a thing. Sure, it would've been nice to have everyone stay on that worked on the first two, but life goes on.

Quite frankly, I find it sad that most have written off Ratner as I purpose he's going to do a killer job.

Are you nuts? Track records mean everything. I can't think of any director who's known for mediocre schlock that magically escaped the stink of his own scent. Film is a directors medium, if it sucks, I blame him. His eye controls the outcome. It'll surely be full of really bold primary colors, and very loud, but good? No way.
 
karasu said:
Are you nuts? Track records mean everything. I can't think of any director who's known for mediocre schlock that magically escaped the stink of his own scent. Film is a directors medium, if it sucks, I blame him. His eye controls the outcome. It'll surely be full of really bold primary colors, and very loud, but good? No way.

A bigger problem with Ratner is he knows jack shit about the material. He just wants to see his name on a big project like X-Men (or Superman before it).

When he was attached to Superman, he told LatinoReview that "Kids today don't know those movies; they were done 20 years ago. 10-year-old kids know SUPERMAN, but they don't know the mythology."

Except he didn't know anything about the Superman mythology because the disaster that was the JJ Abrams script he was going to direct had Kal-El and Lex Luthor being Kryptonian cousins, Krypton DOES NOT explode, the Superman suit is organic and it comes from a can, baby Clark beats up a rapist as he's raping Ma Kent, and Lex Luthor and Superman have a mid-air kung fu battle right out of The Matrix. Ratner called the script "Fucking awesome" in the interview.
 
ManaByte said:
A bigger problem with Ratner is he knows jack shit about the material. He just wants to see his name on a big project like X-Men (or Superman before it).

When he was attached to Superman, he told LatinoReview that "Kids today don't know those movies; they were done 20 years ago. 10-year-old kids know SUPERMAN, but they don't know the mythology."

Except he didn't know anything about the Superman mythology because the disaster that was the JJ Abrams script he was going to direct had Kal-El and Lex Luthor being Kryptonian cousins, Krypton DOES NOT explode, the Superman suit is organic and it comes from a can, baby Clark beats up a rapist as he's raping Ma Kent, and Lex Luthor and Superman have a mid-air kung fu battle right out of The Matrix. Ratner called the script "Fucking awesome" in the interview.

...........

Thank god for Singer.
 
Plus, in the Abrams script, Jimmy Olsen was gay. And Superman dies, but he goes to Heaven and his dad senses his death on the non-exploding Krypton, kills himself and tells Supes, "What the fuck!?! Get back in your body, you maggot!"

And he wills himself back to life.

Fucking awesome indeed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom