MetalAlien said:You talking to me? If you read my quote, I'm saying they are about equal, and I explain why there only appeared to be a power difference.
:lol :lol
MetalAlien said:You talking to me? If you read my quote, I'm saying they are about equal, and I explain why there only appeared to be a power difference.
Izzy said:Metal Alien, I want you to write 1000 word essay on why PS3 and Xbox 360 are equal. Don't let me down.
Amir0x said:My gut feeling and my eyes lead me to believe that theoretically the Xbox360 is equal to PS3 - on the screen, where it makes a difference!
Cold-Steel said:Xbox: We've got more power than the PlayStation 2!.
PS2: It's all about the games! Power doesn't matter!
PS3: We've got 2x the power of the Xbox 360!
Xbox 360: It's all about the games! Power doesn't matter!
Or does it?
Not only that, but X360 has 48 pipelines. PS3 has 24 pipelines. Notice how Sony did not display that stat on any spec-sheets.Ghost said:I love how people say FACT: then give theoretical performance numbers.
:lol
360 does seem to be impressing more and more, the gamespot guys were gushing over Full Auto yesturday "Burnout with guns, im there".
Apparently there are a few live demos on the show floor over the show, so maybe they'll show more stuff.
Ghost of Bill Gates said:Not only that, but X360 has 48 pipelines. PS3 has 24 pipelines. Notice how Sony did not display that stat on any spec-sheets.
X360 has 10mb of Edram on the chip. This allows for "free" Full Screen Anti-Aliasing. Sony has to dip into their 256mb of System Ram.
PSE = 1 CELL = 7 SPEs = 7 threads
X360 = 1 CPU = 3 cores = 6 threads
Theres all the info anyone should need. Both consoles are just about even in terms of power. One things for shure is that they are alot closer than Xbox and PS2 were.
sonycowboy said:First, Cell has 7 SPE's and 1 core = 8 processing units
IBM's processor has 3 cores, but each allows 2 instructions <> 6 processing units.
Processor-wise, Sony KILLS Microsoft. It's not even close.
Ghost of Bill Gates said:It seems close to me by your own logic. :lol
Nvidia uses separate Vertex and Pixel Shaders, ATI uses a Unified Shader which does both Vertex and Pixel Shading using the same Shader. When Nvidia calculates performance, it totals both Vertex and Pixel Shaders running at peak efficiency. When ATI calculates performance, it totals the performance of the single unified shader (composed of both Pixel and Vertex shaders) at peak efficiency. So this means that in order to compare ATI's performance to Nvidia's, you would double the rated performance.
Izzy said:Comedy gold.
bigfurb said:Hey ghost coud you care to give us some direct links to those "steady news leaks" that show the 360 is equal in power to the ps3? I'm having a little trouble finding them myself.
bigfurb said:Hey ghost coud you care to give us some direct links to those "steady news leaks" that show the 360 is equal in power to the ps3? I'm having a little trouble finding them myself.
http://new.ga-forum.com/showpost.php?p=1397306&postcount=9bigfurb said:Alright then, which thread am I supposed to be looking in?
seismologist said:it would be pretty easy for Sony to bump the specs to get the performance they need.
Especially with the 6 month window. I mean X360 is 6 months away and they're still working at 30% performance?
sonycowboy said:You're falling for the bait...
According to the newest information released by Microsoft they were hiding information to throw Sony off, and the Xbox 360 GPU is indeed more powerful than that of the Ps3.
Chittagong said:So, I finally got to see what Microsoft had to show. No, not the Xbox 360. Very brief impressions:
- All demos I saw on Microsoft booth had a Xbox 360 unit as a decoy, but inside the box there was an alpha kit running the games
- Full Auto, Call of Duty, Kameo, the Sega hack-n-slash, the tennis game all were very meh - 1.5 indeed
- No Perfect Dark to be seen
- Xbox and Xbox 360 games were just next to each other, without a clear, dedicated area for Xbox 360.
- Need for Seed looked awful - framerate 10 - 15 fps occasionally (understandable at this point) and controls almost unplayable
- The console looks a lot cooler in real life than in pictures. It was well hidden just next to the Gizmondo booth, outside the Xbox booth. Controller is smaller than I expected.
AB 101 said:And are you so sure Sony and nVidia fully tip their hat?
How about it Bill.
how about you do the same as to why it's not... since you're so sure about it.Izzy said:Since when fanboy babble on an Internet forum counts as a fact? Empirical evidence, please. With detailed spec comparison.
dorio said:Can someone tell me if the games on the floor are mainly being limited by the cpu or the gpu in the alpha kits.