• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Xbox 360 in 1080i

Sinatar

Official GAF Bottom Feeder
So now that much of the gaming press is getting their hands on the 360, are there any impressions of how it looks in 1080i? We all know 720p looks great, but if I can save $2k by going for a 1080i set, I will do it assuming it still looks awesome.
 
Fran from IGN said there is some slight color loss when upscaling to 1080i, but it's not very noticeable.


EDIT: Here's the exact quote...

I only have a 1080i set at the moment. If it's your only choice, no, it's not a huge loss. There's just a slight loss in color and sharpness. It's not a huge deal, though.
 
Yeah, my HDTV doesn't do 720p, so I'll be playing everything at 1080i. I'm pretty excited to see how it ends up looking.
 
Man I'm torn between getting an LCD or a 1080i CRT TV. Anyone know some good 1080i's I can look at to help me decide?
 
From what I've been reading, you should set your 360 to 720p output and let your TV do the upscaling, as the scalar on your TV should be better than what the console can do... the scalar on my XBR should do well...
 
I'm surprised that no one has asked the following question:

What resolution are the games going to be when connecting the 360 to a CRT PC monitor using the VGA cable?
 
Shawn said:
I'm surprised that no one has asked the following question:

What resolution are the games going to be when connecting the 360 to a CRT PC monitor using the VGA cable?

Whatever resolution you set the 360 dash to, so if you go 720 it'll be 1280x720 (or whatever 720p ends up being)
 
ghostmind said:
From what I've been reading, you should set your 360 to 720p output and let your TV do the upscaling, as the scalar on your TV should be better than what the console can do... the scalar on my XBR should do well...

Problem is that my 51" CRT projection TV downscales 720p to 480p .... so I will need to set the X360 to 1080i
 
I only have a 1080i set at the moment. If it's your only choice, no, it's not a huge loss. There's just a slight loss in color and sharpness. It's not a huge deal, though.

If there's a loss of color, somebody screwed up in designing the scaler or encoder. This is probably just bunk.

I'm betting that widescreen 480p (852x480) might look good as "1080i" on those cheaper CRT HDTVs.

Maybe on a real cheap one.

as the scalar on your TV should be better than what the console can do

Not likely, and also more likely to lag. And in some cases this is double scaling (PGR3), which means even more artifacts and lag.

Nowhere in the universe would you want to scale 1024x600 -> 1280x720 -> 1920x1080.
 
ghostmind said:
From what I've been reading, you should set your 360 to 720p output and let your TV do the upscaling, as the scalar on your TV should be better than what the console can do... the scalar on my XBR should do well...

I can't imagine that any scalar built-in to your TV would be better than a top-of-the-line ATI card.
 
Shawn said:
I'm surprised that no one has asked the following question:

What resolution are the games going to be when connecting the 360 to a CRT PC monitor using the VGA cable?

You get tons of options with VGA cable:
640x480, 848x480, 1024x768, 1280x720, 1280x768, and 1360x768
 
ghostmind said:
From what I've been reading, you should set your 360 to 720p output and let your TV do the upscaling, as the scalar on your TV should be better than what the console can do... the scalar on my XBR should do well...
I was wondering that exact thing....I'll have to test out which looks best.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
If there's a loss of color, somebody screwed up in designing the scaler or encoder. This is probably just bunk

I agree that thats probably bunk. But LCD screens do have the potential to be more vibrant (color) than CRTs. So it could be the guys CRT HDTV that really looks less vibrant.
 
Stop spelling scaler wrong!

But LCD screens do have the potential to be more vibrant (color) than CRTs

No!

6. Color and Gray-Scale Accuracy
The internal Gamma and gray-scale of an LCD is very irregular. Special circuitry attempts to fix it, often with only limited success. LCDs typically produce fewer than 256 discrete intensity levels. For some LCDs portions of the gray-scale may be dithered. Images are pleasing but not accurate because of problems with black-level, gray-scale and Gamma, which affects the accuracy of the gray-scale and color mixtures. Generally not suitable for professional image color balancing.

http://www.displaymate.com/lcds.html
 
Whatever resolution you set the 360 dash to, so if you go 720 it'll be 1280x720 (or whatever 720p ends up being)

You get tons of options with VGA cable:640x480, 848x480, 1024x768, 1280x720, 1280x768, and 1360x768

I'm not sure if I understand...

Does that mean if I feel like playing my games in 640p, I select "640p" in the 360 Dash, and the 360 sets my monitor to 640p?

If I feel like playing my games in 720p, I select "720p" in the Dash, and the 360 sets my monitor to 720p?

Same thing with 1080i??

Am I understanding this correctly?
 
Shawn said:
I'm not sure if I understand...

Does that mean if I feel like playing my games in 640p, I select "640p" in the 360 Dash, and the 360 sets my monitor to 640p?

If I feel like playing my games in 720p, I select "720p" in the Dash, and the 360 sets my monitor to 720p?

Same thing with 1080i??

Am I understanding this correctly?

Monitors do not get "set"... they just display whatever is fed to them. But yes, that's essentially how it will work.
 
720p and 1080i as you're refering to them are HDTV video standards, not VGA video standards, the resolutions that were listed in an earlier post for the VGA are what the console will actually output to your monitor.

If you have a CRT monitor you can pick the highest resolution your monitor supports, adjust the geometry appropriately and game away. If you're feeding a fix-panel monitor, such as an LCD monitor you'll have to deal with how the monitor scales the picture if none of the supported resolutions are the native resolution of your monitor.
 
I'm wondering what 360 games will look like on a non-HD TV with component cables, considering that I won't be able to afford an HD for at least five more months. =\
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Um, ask any ISF tech what consumer fixed-pixel display technology exceeds a decent CRT for color accuracy and saturation. ROLLEYES.

I've personally already knew about the CRT color accuracy. I remember working with Mac users that didn't ever want to touch LCD monitors. I was under the perception though that LCDs were more color vibrant though. I'm satisfied with my CRT HDTV anyways.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Um, ask any ISF tech what consumer fixed-pixel display technology exceeds a decent CRT for color accuracy and saturation. ROLLEYES.

color "accuracy", or adhering to the NTSC standard for true color display, isn't the same as displaying more "vibrant" colors. The original quote probably referenced the fact that lots of flat-panels display things in a very over-saturated manner that makes the TV look more "vibrant" than CRTs. This is also a major factor as to why they sell better. This bothers a lot of videophiles who can't stand how people leave their TVs on torch mode when they bring them home, but it certainly does catch a person's eye as a more "vibrant" image.
 
Most people are drawn to oversaturated images with the color and light just blooming all over the place. I've actually talked to friends of mine who aren't so technically inclined and they'll argue round and round that TVs in torch mode at something like a Best Buy look better than accurately adjusted TVs. It's not until I walk them through AVIA that they even begin to understand where I'm coming from.
 
L-gon said:
Most people are drawn to oversaturated images with the color and light just blooming all over the place. I've actually talked to friends of mine who aren't so technically inclined and they'll argue round and round that TVs in torch mode at something like a Best Buy look better than accurately adjusted TVs. It's not until I walk them through AVIA that they even begin to understand where I'm coming from.

Do you know what's more fun than convincing your friends how to correctly adjust their TV's?




Getting laid.
 
*Looks at post counts of the two individuals in question*

It looks like I'm getting a lot more ass than you.
 
Im kind of curious what settings would be best for my monitor. Im gonna use a dell2405fpw lcd monitor(1920x1200 native res), until I find a nice living room hd set deal.When using my hd ccablebox, I find that i prefer setting my hdtv box to 720p(which gets scaled by the monitor) almost all the time, but when i use a 1080i signal, it shows that no scaling is taking place. So what do you think would be the best setup to use with an xbox, 720p with scaling? or 1080i with no scaling, but interlaced image?
 
So is 720p a superior resolution to 1080i? I thought there was some debate about that, but I don't follow these things all that closely. My TV (Sony Wega LCD) handles both natively, so should I set the 360's output to 720?
 
snatches said:
Do you know what's more fun than convincing your friends how to correctly adjust their TV's?




Getting laid.

Do you double fist the beer mugs and then jump up and hoist a keg over your head?


I bet you wore your football uniform during classes when the team had a game that day, didn't you.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Um, ask any ISF tech what consumer fixed-pixel display technology exceeds a decent CRT for color accuracy and saturation. ROLLEYES.


you're probably right. However, just to fuel the fire:

- What monitors will developers be connecting to their Xbox dev kits? Most likely LCD. So we could have a repeat of the GBA/SP situation where the colours of the games are predisposed to be more accurate on an LCD monitor, regardless of whether it is a better display technology or not.
 
VALIS said:
So is 720p a superior resolution to 1080i? I thought there was some debate about that, but I don't follow these things all that closely. My TV (Sony Wega LCD) handles both natively, so should I set the 360's output to 720?

Depends. The difference is actually very negligable when it comes down to it. What you WILL notice from 720p games on a 720p Native screen is a much crisper image. At 1080i the image will be blurrier than the 720p image. None is actually superior than the other. Some may actually say that 1080i being a higher res actually nullifies the fact that the 720p res is progressivley scanned.

I've never actually played on a LCD screen before and i've watched WMV-HD video on my 27" CRT HDTV (both 720p and 1080p, 1080p will KICK. YOUR. COMPUTERS. ASS) and it looks very very nice. The real fear comes from scaling. The Xbox360s scaler is actually supposed to be very good so I'm not to worried about that aspect. Just wondering how it will look.
 
For whatever it's worth...

I stood around at Wal-Mart last night and changed the resolution back and forth from 720p to 1080i. I didn't notice much of a difference.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Um, ask any ISF tech what consumer fixed-pixel display technology exceeds a decent CRT for color accuracy and saturation. ROLLEYES.

I'm talking to the extent you put it. Its like the angle issue in LCD.
 
I've thought about it, and I am gonna pick up the VGA cable and play my 360 on my 17" LCD monitor until I get an HDTV next year. I just can't imagine paying all that money for HD visuals, and then play on my crappy 19" analogue TV.
 
mrklaw said:
you're probably right. However, just to fuel the fire:

- What monitors will developers be connecting to their Xbox dev kits? Most likely LCD. So we could have a repeat of the GBA/SP situation where the colours of the games are predisposed to be more accurate on an LCD monitor, regardless of whether it is a better display technology or not.

But what will the graphics designers, the artists, the people who are making the art assets be connecting to most likely?

CRTs, baby.
 
Shogmaster said:
I'm betting that widescreen 480p (852x480) might look good as "1080i" on those cheaper CRT HDTVs.

480p widescreen is still 720x480 actual, just it's pixel aspect ratio is 1.2 (width = 120% of actual pixel size), so it stretches it out to 852ishx480. Like taking a 720x480 image in photoshop and resizing it to 852x480. Yeah, it's wider but it does lose some of its clarity.
 
Shogmaster said:
I'm betting that widescreen 480p (852x480) might look good as "1080i" on those cheaper CRT HDTVs.

i dunno what constitutes a cheaper hdtv, but no way in hell is 480p comparable to 1080 on anything i've seen
 
Error Macro said:
But what will the graphics designers, the artists, the people who are making the art assets be connecting to most likely?

CRTs, baby.

Nah.

Artists are a bunch of fluffy bunnies. They'll be using big ass Apple cinema LCD displays, because 'they need the white surround to balance their chakras'.
 
mrklaw said:
Nah.

Artists are a bunch of fluffy bunnies. They'll be using big ass Apple cinema LCD displays, because 'they need the white surround to balance their chakras'.

Oh, well, now you're talking about artists (pronounced: ar-tee-sts).

That's a whole different story. :lol
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Um, ask any ISF tech what consumer fixed-pixel display technology exceeds a decent CRT for color accuracy and saturation. ROLLEYES.



Exactly, I don't buy it at all. I'll have to see for myself. As for the whole 720p being "better" than 1080i, I disagree. A 1080i image has more than twice the resolution of a 720p image. Different strokes for different folks. Many argue that 720p is better for fast motion, like sports broadcasts and games, but for slower images 1080i is superior in image quality. I've seen movies in both formats, and 1080i wins hands down. The problem is that very few consumer sets, if any, fully resolve the 2 million+ pixels in a 1080i image. With that said, I've seen the scalers on many 1080i sets, when viewing a 720p image, and with the better TVs, aside from slight flickering, the image was indistinguishable from a 720p image on a set that displays a 720p image natively. There should be no loss in color vibrancy.
 
I have a 480p/1080i set in my room, which I'll probably use. If I'm not happy with it I'll grab the vga adapter or put the 360 in the living room.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Um, ask any ISF tech what consumer fixed-pixel display technology exceeds a decent CRT for color accuracy and saturation. ROLLEYES.

I'll take the perfect geometry, per pixel picture reproduction, increased resolution, increased screen size and reduced foot-print of a plasma or LCD over the ever-so-slightly-coloured-colors of a CRT any day of the week.

Another 1080i yes 720p no set owner here - if 1080i looks hot on my 360 I'll keep it, if it looks like it could be improved on then I'll probably pick up a new 720p capable screen.
 
Top Bottom