• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Yay for standardized testing - Georgia Public School cheat scandal uncovered

Status
Not open for further replies.

Escape Goat

Member
Award-winning gains by Atlanta students were based on widespread cheating by 178 named teachers and principals, said Georgia Gov.

Nathan Deal on Tuesday.
His office released a report from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation that names 178 teachers and principals – 82 of whom confessed – in what's likely the biggest cheating scandal in US history.

This appears to be the largest of dozens of major cheating scandals, unearthed across the country. The allegations point an ongoing problem for US education, which has developed an ever-increasing dependence on standardized tests.

The report on the Atlanta Public Schools, released Tuesday, indicates a "widespread" conspiracy by teachers, principals and administrators to fix answers on the Criterion-Referenced Competency Test (CRCT), punish whistle-blowers, and hide improprieties.

It "confirms our worst fears," says Mayor Kasim Reed. "There is no doubt that systemic cheating occurred on a widespread basis in the school system." The news is “absolutely devastating," said Brenda Muhammad, chairwoman of the Atlanta school board. "It’s our children. You just don’t cheat children.”



On its face, the investigation tarnishes the 12-year tenure of Superintendent Beverly Hall, who was named US Superintendent of the Year in 2009 largely because of the school system's reported gains – especially in inner-city schools. She has not been directly implicated, but investigators said she likely knew, or should have known, what was going on. In her farewell address to teachers in June, Hall for the first time acknowledged wrongdoing in the district, but blamed other administrators.

The Atlanta cheating scandal also offers the first most comprehensive view yet into a growing number of teacher-cheating allegations across the US, reports of which reached a rate of two to three a week in June, says Robert Schaeffer, a spokesman for the National Center for Fair & Open Testing, which advocates against high-stakes testing.

It's also a tacit indictment, critics say, of politicians putting all bets for improving education onto high-stakes tests that punish and reward students, teachers, and principals for test scores.

"When test scores are all that matter, some educators feel pressured to get the scores they need by hook or by crook," says Mr. Schaeffer. "The higher the stakes, the greater the incentive to manipulate, to cheat."

The 55,000-student Atlanta public school system rose in national prominence during the 2000s, as test scores steadily rose and the district received notice and funding from the Broad Foundation and the Gates Foundation. But behind that rise, the state found, were teachers and principals in 44 schools erasing and changing test answers.

One of the most troubling aspects of the Atlanta cheating scandal, says the report, is that the district repeatedly refused to properly investigate or take responsibility for the cheating. Moreover, the central office told some principals not to cooperate with investigators. In one case, an administrator instructed employees to tell investigators to "go to hell." When teachers tried to alert authorities, they were labeled "disgruntled." One principal opened an ethics investigation against a whistle-blower.

Investigations by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) and state investigators found a pattern consistent with other cheating scandals: a spike in test scores in one critical grade would be followed by an equally dramatic drop the next year. A USA Today investigation in March found that erasure data in six states and the District of Columbia showed these "abnormal patterns," according to testing expert Thomas Haladyna at Arizona State University.

The Atlanta testing allegations led to the first major law enforcement investigation of teacher cheating. Scandals in other states have typically been investigated by state officials. In response to recent teacher cheating allegations in Baltimore, Michael Sarbanes, the district's community engagement director, told District Management Journal, an industry publication for school administrators, that manipulating a test is "inherent in human nature, [although] we think people who do that are outliers."

Ten states now use test scores as the main criterion in teacher evaluations. Other states reward high-scoring teachers with up to $25,000 bonuses – while low scores could result in principals losing their jobs or entire schools closing. Even as the number of scandals grows, experts say it remains fairly easy for teachers and principals to get away with ethical lapses.

"I think the broadest issue in the [Atlanta scandal] raises is why many school districts and states continue to have high-stakes testing without rigorous auditing or security procedures," says Brian Jacob, director of the Center on Local, State and Urban Policy at the University of Michigan. "In some sense, this is one of the least worrisome problems in public education, because it's fairly easy to fix. The more difficult and troubling behavior would be teaching to the test, which we think of as a lesser form of test manipulation, but which is much harder to detect, and could warp the education process in ways that we wouldn't like."

In response to cheating scandals, some states and school districts have instituted tougher test-auditing standards, employing software that analyzes erasure rates and patterns. Meanwhile, the Obama administration is reforming NCLB to reduce pressure on teachers and principals. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in June that NCLB “is creating a slow-motion train wreck for children, parents, and teachers.” On the other hand, an Obama administration proposal – to pay bonuses to teachers who improve test scores in their classes – may shift the stakes without lowering them.

"The [Atlanta] teachers, principals and administrators wanted to prove that the faith of the Broad and Gates Foundations and the Chamber of Commerce in the district was not misplaced and that APS could rewrite the script of urban education in America and provide a happy, or at least a happier, ending for its students," writes the AJC's education columnist, Maureen Downey.

"And that’s what ought to alarm us," adds Ms. Downey, "that these professionals ultimately felt their students could not even pass basic competency tests, despite targeted school improvement plans, proven reforms, and state-of-the-art teacher training."

Lovely.
 

Orayn

Member
I've got mixed feelings on the importance of standardized tests, but this is pretty messed up. We need more oversight to prevent this kind of thing...
 

Lord Error

Insane For Sony
Count Dookkake said:
lol

Like students were getting any smarter. Who would believe this?
Technically no one needs to become smarter to get better grades. If you have someone that can make you understand something really well, or make you interested in learning something, it can really help.

smokeymicpot said:
Sounds a little bit like The Wire.
Yeah, first thing that crossed my mind was: The Wire was right about something again.
 
stand-and-deliver-poster.jpg
 

RBH

Member
This is why I went to private school in Atlanta.
lvEyC.gif





But seriously, this is pretty damn embarrassing.
 

Bboy AJ

My dog was murdered by a 3.5mm audio port and I will not rest until the standard is dead
Atlanta is and always been a shit hole. I'm glad to see that 'city' is continuing its long standing traditions.
 

Retro

Member
Standardized Testing needs to go away. They have become so central to the educational system in the United States that more time is spent preparing students for the material on the test ("Teaching the Test") instead of providing a solid foundation across a wide variety of subjects. Eventually, you produce a student body able to ace tests (well, in theory, since most test scores in this country are still pretty dismal) but does poorly on non-tested subjects (science, history, critical thinking, social studies, etc) and while able to tell you the answer to some things, is incapable of telling you why those things are important.
 

Zzoram

Member
Standardized testing is still necessary to measure the performance of students. It should only be used to measure performance of students to compare with other states and countries, so the tests should be standardized internationally.



However, standardized tests should not be used to fire teachers or defund schools. That is completely illogical and also leads to stuff like this. If a school's students are doing poorly, taking away their money isn't going to solve the problem, and will likely make it worse.
 

MasterShotgun

brazen editing lynx
I swear I didn't choose to be born in Georgia. I stayed in-state for college (and because GT is a good college), but I really don't think I want to stay here permanently. When I have kids of my own, they deserve a better education than the one Georgia provides. I might upset family by moving away, but they would get over it eventually
 

ruxtpin

Banned
Doesn't surprise me. Lots of people in this state are dumb as fuck. (Yeah... I live there, I await said jokes that I'm one of those dumbasses.) =P

(No, really - I'm a smart chap! I swear!)
 
Retro said:
Standardized Testing needs to go away. They have become so central to the educational system in the United States that more time is spent preparing students for the material on the test ("Teaching the Test") instead of providing a solid foundation across a wide variety of subjects. Eventually, you produce a student body able to ace tests (well, in theory, since most test scores in this country are still pretty dismal) but does poorly on non-tested subjects (science, history, critical thinking, social studies, etc) and while able to tell you the answer to some things, is incapable of telling you why those things are important.

I feel the same way but they have to teach the test to an extent but they spend so much time teaching to the test that they miss the fundamentals completely. I did well in grade school from the classes to the standardized tests. I also did well in undergrad. Graduate engineering is a whole new ball park. I wish I was taught all my fundamental subjects better. I always feel I'm farther behind then most international students.

Cheating is definitely not the way to do it. Cheating doesn't get results once you have to apply the things you're suppose to learn. Those teachers are doing our future a great injustice and it won't show until we are behind the curve in technology and innovation because we don't have the workforce to sustain it.
 

Zeppu

Member
Once, when I was younger, we managed to 'hack' (sub7) the computer teacher's home PC and get the final exam paper a week early.

got a 98/100.
 

Enosh

Member
Retro said:
Standardized Testing needs to go away. They have become so central to the educational system in the United States that more time is spent preparing students for the material on the test ("Teaching the Test") instead of providing a solid foundation across a wide variety of subjects. Eventually, you produce a student body able to ace tests (well, in theory, since most test scores in this country are still pretty dismal) but does poorly on non-tested subjects (science, history, critical thinking, social studies, etc) and while able to tell you the answer to some things, is incapable of telling you why those things are important.
well tell me a better way to see if the students know something you have just tought them

and the last part is bullshit, you can get students to know why something hapened by asking them about it, hell as an example history test are full of "so X hapened at Y explain the conditions in Z that lead to X"
 

Zzoram

Member
josephdebono said:
Once, when I was younger, we managed to 'hack' (sub7) the computer teacher's home PC and get the final exam paper a week early.

got a 98/100.

You need to study more. You had the answers and only got 98?
 
Isnt a lot of federal/state funding tied to these scores? Its no surprise their cheating on them, it makes the school money.

What does amaze me is it took them this long to find out.
 

Big-E

Member
When everything is boiled down to a single test things like this will happen. It is a hard predicament but I think there needs to be more faith put into teachers to teach the material and not force everyone to take a single test in order to evaluate performance of students and teachers. You really only have to pop into a class and observe a teacher and within a few minutes you can gauge whether the class is engaged and if the students like the teacher and that should be enough to decided if a teacher is good or bad.
 

Miggytronz

Member
This is why they need to do away with these stupid standardized tests that determine where the money gets allocated to, IMO. Here in Virginia I was the last or one of the last years that you didn't have to pass the test to pass the grade, but they started that soon after I graduated. Even then my school pretty much built the curriculum around the SOL test and pretty much only taught us what would be on it.
 
Man, if only other countries had superior methods of setting up an educational system where educators wouldn't see the need for these shenanigans.
 
Enosh said:
well tell me a better way to see if the students know something you have just tought them"

Make students in high school have mid-terms and finals. That's what my school did and they were worth like 50 percent of your final grade. When I was growing up, even in grade school, my teachers never taught to the test. We were taught all the subjects. We were actually challenged and not treated like morons. We had blue book exams. Multiple choice tests rarely existed. Our school always aced standardized tests because we already had a broad enough education to go into such tests blind and still do well.
 
Christ....GA strikes the news yet again! Why can't we manage cool things at least here and there? Arrgh

Not at all surprising, if anything I'd think it to be a much wider slate of people than the ones they've currently accused. This state is on as big a downward spiral on education overall as it is in pretty much all else---IMO the bottom began to a fall out in a big way a bit past the mid-90's from elementary on up at the very least.
 

sans_pants

avec_pénis
GillianSeed79 said:
Make students in high school have mid-terms and finals. That's what my school did and they were worth like 50 percent of your final grade. When I was growing up, even in grade school, my teachers never taught to the test. We were taught all the subjects. We were actually challenged and not treated like morons. We had blue book exams. Multiple choice tests rarely existed. Our school always aced standardized tests because we already had a broad enough education to go into such tests blind and still do well.


the federal government kinda forced this bullshit testing system onto the schools
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
GillianSeed79 said:
Make students in high school have mid-terms and finals. That's what my school did and they were worth like 50 percent of your final grade. When I was growing up, even in grade school, my teachers never taught to the test. We were taught all the subjects. We were actually challenged and not treated like morons. We had blue book exams. Multiple choice tests rarely existed. Our school always aced standardized tests because we already had a broad enough education to go into such tests blind and still do well.
Do most schools not do this? My high-school required midterms and finals in all classes.
 

Slavik81

Member
GillianSeed79 said:
Make students in high school have mid-terms and finals. That's what my school did and they were worth like 50 percent of your final grade. When I was growing up, even in grade school, my teachers never taught to the test. We were taught all the subjects. We were actually challenged and not treated like morons. We had blue book exams. Multiple choice tests rarely existed. Our school always aced standardized tests because we already had a broad enough education to go into such tests blind and still do well.
Is standardized testing something different in the USA? In Alberta we have provincial exams after every 3 years of schooling. They're basically just final exams for the courses they test.

They're there to measure for any grade inflation at schools, and to ensure schools are teaching the provincially mandated curriculum for the class. I really don't see anything wrong with them.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
Slavik81 said:
Is standardized testing something different in the USA? In Alberta we have provincial exams after every 3 years of schooling. They're basically just final exams for the courses they test.
A school can choose to have their own testing procedures that require exams, finals at the end of every semester and such. I assumed this was common practice, although I don't know.

However in the US when people talk about standardized testing they are talking about the generalized nation-wide "four subject" exams (usually science, math, reading comprehension and history/sociology) that every student has to take every few years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom