EU Parliament votes to protect "net neutrality"

Status
Not open for further replies.
...oh and end roaming fees by 2016

At the same time, the parliament voted in favour of maintaining "net neutrality", effectively declaring that all traffic on the Internet should be treated equally, regardless of the source or the content.

The decision is a move to limit the ability of network operators to provide quicker Internet access to content providers in exchange for a fee and is another decision in favour of consumers.

Both steps are part of Kroes's plans to overhaul Europe's telecoms sector and try to make it more competitive with rivals in the United States and Asia. But they also come just two months before EU elections, when more than 300 million Europeans will vote for candidates to the European Parliament.

Boo
 
It only took one governing body to make the jump, now watch support for the Trans Pacific Pact dry up faster than you can see it happening.
 
Both steps are part of Kroes's plans to overhaul Europe's telecoms sector and try to make it more competitive with rivals in the United States and Asia.

This seems slightly odd to me? Everything I've heard suggests that the US telecoms market is stuffed with various local monopolies, where as the UK has a really competitive market for this kind of stuff (from mobile phones to internet access). Not everywhere of course, but for most people there's a pretty good choice, and that's lead us to have pretty good speeds, pretty cheap pricing and, for me at least, I've never had a data cap or throttling (that I've been aware of).

That said, my girlfriend lives in Spain and pays a lot more for a much worse service, so maybe what I describe is a UK thing rather than a European thing.
 
You forgot the sarcasm tags... :(

But this is awesome news. Was afraid they were going to do the original text which left a lot of room. But parliament made great additions...

The EU gets a lot of stick, but they get things right from time to time. :)
 
Amazing, it was approved in Brazil a few days ago too (still needs Senate approval but it will happen soon enough).
 
That said, my girlfriend lives in Spain and pays a lot more for a much worse service, so maybe what I describe is a UK thing rather than a European thing.

The UK landline/broadband market is reasonably competitive because the government regulates pretty heavily the prices which BT Openreach resells access to the national phone infrastructure. Plus Virgin Media having it's own independent cable network in some pretty large markets helps.
 
This seems slightly odd to me? Everything I've heard suggests that the US telecoms market is stuffed with various local monopolies, where as the UK has a really competitive market for this kind of stuff (from mobile phones to internet access). Not everywhere of course, but for most people there's a pretty good choice, and that's lead us to have pretty good speeds, pretty cheap pricing and, for me at least, I've never had a data cap or throttling (that I've been aware of).

That said, my girlfriend lives in Spain and pays a lot more for a much worse service, so maybe what I describe is a UK thing rather than a European thing.

I don't think they mean an internally competative market, but one that ensures that the EU's market is able to keep up with the United States and, mostly, Asia. It seems like he is talking about global competitiveness.
 
The UK landline/broadband market is reasonably competitive because the government regulates pretty heavily the prices which BT Openreach resells access to the national phone infrastructure. Plus Virgin Media having it's own independent cable network in some pretty large markets helps.

Aye, though the former is a sort of natural result of BT being a nationalised industry for so long. It's the weird situation wherein BT itself, when nationalised, was horribly uncompetitive (it just had no competition) but now the infrastructure being in the hands of, effectively via the regulation, the government is allowing the private sector to leverage that competitively.
 
Thank Christ. Neelie Kroes, you crazy woman. I expected more from you than this insanity.
 
Aye, though the former is a sort of natural result of BT being a nationalised industry for so long. It's the weird situation wherein BT itself, when nationalised, was horribly uncompetitive (it just had no competition) but now the infrastructure being in the hands of, effectively via the regulation, the government is allowing the private sector to leverage that competitively.

however when BT was a monopoly in the 80s they offered to fibre-optic the whole country, the government (thatcher) said no, most people still cant get get fibre now
 
however when BT was a monopoly in the 80s they offered to fibre-optic the whole country, the government (thatcher) said no, most people still cant get get fibre now

[citation needed]

Great news for 500 million people in the EU. Of course, UKIP didn't vote on this, I guess they don't really care about net neutrality and don't mind UK residents to get shafted abroad or something.

They brought up this vote in the TV debate last night, funnily enough. You'd be surprised how much good policy comes out of the EU Parliament, but most people don't hear about it as it's the kind of policy news channels don't care about.
 
[citation needed]

Great news for 500 million people in the EU. Of course, UKIP didn't vote on this, I guess they don't really care about net neutrality and don't mind UK residents to get shafted abroad or something.

I think the UKIP thought process is along the lines of "Mainland Europe, why on earth would you go there?"
 
Ahhh! Nothing like browsing neutral internet while roaming at reasonable charges on my phone connected to the standardized charger and having a beer and a cig/vape in public while being 18.
 
Man, I can't wait until the UK pulls out of this authoritarian mess!
yeah, we can't wait either
jk

Ahhh! Nothing like browsing neutral internet while roaming at reasonable charges on my phone connected to the standardized charger and having a beer and a cig/vape in public while being 18.

16*
*in some countries

truly the land of the free
but I wish it wasn't *cough*
 
Net neutrality would force ISPs not to filter anything.

I would argue that ISPs should be able to filter whatever the fuck they want, but in the current context the effects would be interesting: filtering P2P or censoring websites would be legally impossible.

But I suppose that, for this experts' committee, net neutrality will mean that ISPs can't filter anything unless the government tells them to. All the cons without the pros.

It's a stupid idea and I don't see how preventing people/companies to make voluntary contracts with each other helps freedom in any way.
 
Net neutrality would force ISPs not to filter anything.

I would argue that ISPs should be able to filter whatever the fuck they want, but in the current context the effects would be interesting: filtering P2P or censoring websites would be legally impossible.

But I suppose that, for this experts' committee, net neutrality will mean that ISPs can't filter anything unless the government tells them to. All the cons without the pros.

It's a stupid idea and I don't see how preventing people/companies to make voluntary contracts with each other helps freedom in any way.

Say what?
Do you understand what net neutrality is and why it is important?
It's got nothing to do with taking away freedom from our much loved corporations and governments....
 
So this means European providers can't pull shit like Comcast did with Netflix right?

Exactly.


Net neutrality would force ISPs not to filter anything.

I would argue that ISPs should be able to filter whatever the fuck they want, but in the current context the effects would be interesting: filtering P2P or censoring websites would be legally impossible.

But I suppose that, for this experts' committee, net neutrality will mean that ISPs can't filter anything unless the government tells them to. All the cons without the pros.

It's a stupid idea and I don't see how preventing people/companies to make voluntary contracts with each other helps freedom in any way.

You need to read up on a few things if you seriously believe ISPs should be allowed to filter any content they desire.
 
This seems slightly odd to me? Everything I've heard suggests that the US telecoms market is stuffed with various local monopolies, where as the UK has a really competitive market for this kind of stuff (from mobile phones to internet access). Not everywhere of course, but for most people there's a pretty good choice, and that's lead us to have pretty good speeds, pretty cheap pricing and, for me at least, I've never had a data cap or throttling (that I've been aware of).

That said, my girlfriend lives in Spain and pays a lot more for a much worse service, so maybe what I describe is a UK thing rather than a European thing.
If you look at the European market as a whole, the different regulation in each country makes it difficult to invest in the sector, and the often hefty roaming charges when you are abroad means any cross-border services are dead in the water. Most people don't use mobile internet when they are abroad in another EU country because they assume it's going to cost them a fortune, so attempting to create services such as, for example, interactive travel guide apps become almost pointless because very few people will use them when they travel unless they have access to Wifi.
 
The Out-Campaign has a new slogan.
End Net Neutrality in 2017!

lol. To be fair our goverment should have done something like this years ago, rather than pissing about with poxy porn filters. Why not look out for the consumer? Rhetorical question, I know they don't give a fuck.
 
Really happy about this, the EU gets it and stopping the ISPs from licking their lips after the terrible stuff that has been happening in the US.
 
I wonder how the roaming changes will work? Will it come out of your normal contract, or pay local non-contract rates? For example, if I have an unlimited 4G contract and go to France, can I just utterly rinse Orange.fr's 4G whilst I'm there? I can't imagine that'll be the case. I wonder!
 
I wonder how the roaming changes will work? Will it come out of your normal contract, or pay local non-contract rates? For example, if I have an unlimited 4G contract and go to France, can I just utterly rinse Orange.fr's 4G whilst I'm there? I can't imagine that'll be the case. I wonder!

Don't know, but I can't shake the feeling the ISP will try to screw us using another scheme.
 
This seems slightly odd to me? Everything I've heard suggests that the US telecoms market is stuffed with various local monopolies, where as the UK has a really competitive market for this kind of stuff (from mobile phones to internet access). Not everywhere of course, but for most people there's a pretty good choice, and that's lead us to have pretty good speeds, pretty cheap pricing and, for me at least, I've never had a data cap or throttling (that I've been aware of).

That said, my girlfriend lives in Spain and pays a lot more for a much worse service, so maybe what I describe is a UK thing rather than a European thing.

The Belgian telecom market is an oligopolic mess.
 
our utility services being able to take a bulldog sized dump on their reluctant customers is a proud british tradition and i'll be damned if those slimy handed bureaucrats in brussels can take it away from us.

oh, did those feet....
 
Hell yeah. I can't wait for the end of roaming costs. It's just so infuriating when you're a German who lives in Austria and can't use your phone when you're going home for the weekend.
 
Ending roaming is excellent news, however I can see some of the service providers getting mega salty over this.

It's great that Three have already started to end roaming charges themselves with their Feel At Home service. Recently had to go down to Dublin on business, felt great not having to worry about sending texts/browsing on my phone, whilst my co-worker had to spend the entire day with his personal phone in plane mode, only able to rely on his terrible business phone.
 
I wonder how the roaming changes will work? Will it come out of your normal contract, or pay local non-contract rates? For example, if I have an unlimited 4G contract and go to France, can I just utterly rinse Orange.fr's 4G whilst I'm there? I can't imagine that'll be the case. I wonder!
Right now at T-Mobile and/or Orange Poland you can buy 'roaming' service where you get billed at amount of local call. It doesn't count towards your minutes.
 
EU does many things right. Media just doesn't cover those extensively because they can't sell papers with them.

Read about EU legislation being passed > extrapolate into the most extreme possiblity > crazy headline like EU MANDATES ALL BANANAS MUST BE NO WIDER THAN 2.674CM > profit
 
The end of roaming fees makes me just as happy.
Mostly for personal reasons, but also because it's a constructive step in forcing the phone companies to actually improve the European infrastructure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom