It’s not a zero sum game though.
Capitalism isn't a zero sum game, but oligopoly and feudalism actually are, and I think people get so caught up defending capitalism from the left they don't realize how much ground they've ceded to the right.
He created value and jobs.
And now he's fighting to take those things away from people. Hence my joke about how we need a level cap. You want people to be able to get rich and succeed, but you don't want to be South Korea where 6 families control 60% of the GDP. We're witnessing the collapse of that society and I think we should look close and take some notes, you know?
In capitalism, wealth is created when money circulates, or changes hands. Commerce grows wealth. But when wealth consolidates, it essentially goes out of circulation, it ceases to create value, and it inevitably drives systemic corruption, which the wealthy leverage to limit the opportunities of the less wealthy to compete with them..
The United States is significantly more competitive across several sectors directly because of him. Many thousands of people have become millionaires by working for him, including Tesla factory workers.
No one is arguing that you shouldn't be able to get rich by starting a business. That's good, we want more people to do that. But when companies and the ultra wealthy grow too large and powerful, it becomes harder and harder for the next generation of entrepreneurs to compete, especially one who controls the regulatory state and wields it to his advantage.
The level cap is that we’re all mortal and will die of old age someday.
If you want to ban inheritance, a 100% estate tax that goes back to the people, I will accept your proposal. I think it's more complicated than that though.