What's the point in cheering for a mid level European soccer team?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Has there ever been talk of an all Europe league ... kind of like how the NFL is structured? Is Champion's League the closest we can get?
You'll never get it because it'll cut into the revenues of the large teams. The dominant teams use the others as farm teams currently. All the talent is concentrated into a few teams in the league and they'll only play each other a handful of times during the season, so the sport itself suffers, but they have a choice to keep winning with bad competition or lose with a better league.
 
I don't get it. All of our leagues are at least competitive with SOME degree of salary control.

Sounds an awful lot like socialism.

slm.gif
 
You can't choose where you're born and what your parents support. This will forever be part of your life. Go WERDER BREMEN! (Old school soccer fans even remember them playing in the Champions League... those were the days.....)
 
Indoctrination and irrational loyalty. Supporting a Swedish team in the top league (ranked 23rd in Europe) can be a huge mental burden but it's often worth it once you get to beat your rivals, maybe eventually perhaps have a chance on the title, get a chance to play against other European teams in Europa League qualification.
 
Not sure if it has been posted yet:

“You can change your wife, your politics, your religion, but never, never can you change your favourite football team.”
– Eric Cantona.

Its all about loyalty, I lambaste Arsenal, call them a disgrace every time they lose, watch as they fail again and again. But god damn it, I'll never stop following them.
 
Beating barca 2-1 last year is the best fooball moment since Holland beat Brazil in 2010.

Its all about these moments :)

In the Dutch Eredivisie Ajax is (by far) the richest club, they made about 100 million last year. 20 million originated from the Champion's League. Meanwhile lowly RKC has a 5 million budget and not a chance to reach the CL. So the gap keeps getting wider.

Yeah it really sucks imho.

Being the richest in Holland still makes us pretty poor in Europe.

There seems to be no place for a club like Ajax.

Maybe if the dutch league would merge with Belgium and Denmark we could get some more money flowing :/
 
What a depressing thread topic

Why bother doing anything?

Obviously people get enjoyment out of it, so what's the problem?
 
You can't choose where you're born and what your parents support. This will forever be part of your life. Go WERDER BREMEN! (Old school soccer fans even remember them playing in the Champions League... those were the days.....)

Don't complain, you'll stay in the Bundesliga (I think) and Bremen has a lot of potential.
I support VfL Bochum and I would looooove to celebrate the promotion to the Bundesliga (As you said, those were the days ;) )
 
If you support a smaller team or a smaller market in any sport and DON'T support a hard cap model, you're buying into the propaganda of millionaire athletes who only want to ensure they can make more millions (at your teams expense).
 
If you support a smaller team or a smaller market in any sport and DON'T support a hard cap model, you're buying into the propaganda of millionaire athletes who only want to ensure they can make more millions (at your teams expense).

I don't blame the individual players. Obviously they're going to want to be paid as much as possible, just like we do. The problem is the executives of the clubs and the governing bodies.
 
Well they're certainly not mid tier.

Despite Croatia have great national team, our local teams are pure sadness. But we love them and cheer for them from the day we're born to the day we die.

We have only one team that can even remotely play to low-tier EU level, but we hate its owner, its policies, its approach to sport and true followers, its way of represeting values and pretty much everything aboit it for last 20 years - but is our home-team and we simply can't go against it deep within. Not even when they can't quailify shit for anything in Championship Leaugue for decades now.

You would never understand it.
 
Birmingham, Swansea, Wigan all won cups recently. Just because you're a small club doesn't mean you can't win things.
 
Sounds an awful lot like socialism.

slm.gif

It is kind of funny how hardcore capitalist USA has a socialist sporting structure while mildly socialist Europe has the most cutthroat sports where the rich get richer and the minnows have to pick themselves up by their bootstraps to compete.
 
You picked a horrible example in Everton for your OP. They have won the First Division a number of times, while in I think 1994 they avoided relegation on the very last day of the season, finished 4th and got in the CL a couple of years ago and in all likelihood might do the same again this season, won and reached the finals of a good few domestic cups also. All very exciting, even for a Liverpool fan like me. You obviously know fuck all about English football to pick them as your example of a team it would be boring to support.
 
For most people it's not even an option, you're born in a family and environment that will dictate who are you going to support for the rest of your life.
 
Yeah it really sucks imho.

Being the richest in Holland still makes us pretty poor in Europe.

Poor compared to the very rich clubs, but still top 25. Simply looking at income, there's no real reason why Ajax can't duplicate Atletico's success:

Top-20-rijkste-voetbalclubs-van-Europa-9199.jpg


Ajax seems to be hoarding money these last few years though. They aren't spending it on big transfers. Atletico got Villa, Ajax got Bojan.

Maybe if the dutch league would merge with Belgium and Denmark we could get some more money flowing :/

We really need to merge with Belgium at least. Never mind the money, it's in Ajax' best interest to have solid competition. Right now teams like Roda and NEC are a complete joke
now watch Twente lose points against them
. If they were replaced with teams like Anderlecht and Standard it would mean a huge boost to the overall level of the league. Also, Utrecht might not make the cut ;)
 
Almost all towns and cities have their own club – 92 league clubs in England, in a country smaller than some US states, for example – so people support their local one. Tribalism, basically.

Also bear in mind that some clubs like Everton, to use your example, were huge back in the day. Kids frequently support the same team as their parents, so people who remember the glory days will pass it down the generations.

Yep. I support Preston North End (even though they're pretty shit, and lose every play-off they're in).

Founder member of the football league though: proper history. We'll be in the Premiership someday.
 
I understand fans supporting midlevel clubs in europe more then I understand fans of teams like Milwaukee Bucks/Brewers, Atlanta Hawks, teams that are constantly midlevel or worse, and dont have the history or community culture that european clubs have.
 
I don't know what the point of supporting a mid level European soccer team is and yet there are so many Manchester United fans even here in the US.
 
One of the things I never understood about how European soccer works is people seem to be okay with how non-competitive it is.

The German Bundesliga for instance has been around since 1963 - 51 years. In that time, one team - Bayern Munich, has won 23 championship titles. The English Premier League is dominated by four teams over the last 20 years - although that seems to be changing with Manchester City being bought by a billionaire. In Spain's La Liga, it's pretty much a two team league with Barcelona and Real Madrid vying for top spot every year.

I get why the top flight teams have fans. I also get why the lower run teams have fans, there is drama in wondering whether your team will stay in the big show next year or not.

What I don't understand is why do teams that are on the B-tier continue to have fans. I know Everton for instance will never be bad enough to be relegated but they will also never be good enough to fight for the top spot unless some crazy Russian billionaire buys them and decides to go nuts.

You dont understand passion and loyalty. If everyone was cheering for a Champions League team, there would be no other teams beside the really big ones because no one would care about the smaller ones just because they are smaller.

My team has won the football championship in Sweden once, and our club was founded in 1897. I dont care if we dont win the championship for the next 100 years, giving up on my team since I was a child is never going to happen!
 
I support my local team which plays five tiers below Bundesliga. I don't care that we will never play in the top tier. It's still fun to watch the games and emotions go wild. Couple years ago we won a regional cup and celebrated like we won the Champions League.

In Europe laegues are structured in a way that there is always drama. Teams can relegate up and down. It never gets boring. Ther's always something to hope for.
 
Loyalty.

You root for your home team. Everton will finish above us (Arsenal) this season IMO
 
Owen Coyle is a charlatan.

We made a succession of poor appointments after Alladyce left - Sammy Lee, Gary Megsln and then Coyle. I'm not convinced by Freedman either but we'll see.

He was doing a good job at Burnley until Judas up and left. Serves them right tbh. Wigan too.

I don't see why it serves Bolton right. Coyle chose to leave and we paid Burnley compensation. And Wigan had nothing to do with it.
 
I support a Championship club (that's the league below the Premier League) and over the years have enjoyed a roller coaster ride of relegation and promotion. My biggest fear, is that one day, my club will be competitive enough to be a mid level Premier League capable of finishing 7th in the league every season.

I support Saints and in 8 years we went from European football to league 1 and almost going out of business. Now were back to mid table mediocrity in the premier league and it's great. Supporting your rubbish team through the highs and lows is what it's all about
 
Just adding that the factor the OP mentioned makes the Brazilian national champioship the best in the world. I mean, just look at that:


Club Won Runner-up
Santos 8 6
Palmeiras 8 3
São Paulo 6 5
Corinthians 5 3
Flamengo 5 1
V. da Gama 4 4
Fluminense 4 0
Internacional 3 6
Cruzeiro 3 5
Botafogo 2 3
Grêmio 2 3
Bahia 2 2
Atl. Mineiro 1 4
Guarani 1 2
Atl. Paran. 1 1
Coritiba 1 0
Sport 1 0 1987 —

Every year there are at least 12 out of 20 teams that have a shot at winning the championship. Comparing even to the Premier League, that's insane.
 
Because it's your home team? To me it's disgusting that people that have no connection to a city or place root for some random ass team. It's like bitch you live in Nebraska. You root for the Royals, the Huskers, the Chiefs, and Creighton maybe. You don't get to root for the Dodgers.

And Sporting KC
 
Why is it so lopsided? Are there no salary caps or anything like that?

Even more than that, there is no draft either. Every year the worst teams in all four major NA sports gets to choose the top prospects. With smart management and a some luck any team despite being a small market/cheap owner can be good. An example is the San Antonio Spurs. They probably have the best winning percentage in any of the four major sports the last 15 years. One of the reasons was getting the 1st overall pick in '97 and selecting the best power forward in NBA history and a top ten all time player.
 
Even more than that, there is no draft either. Every year the worst teams in all four major NA sports gets to choose the top prospects. With smart management and a some luck any team despite being a small market/cheap owner can be good. An example is the San Antonio Spurs. They probably have the best winning percentage in any of the four major sports the last 15 years. One of the reasons was getting the 1st overall pick in '97 and selecting the best power forward in NBA history and a top ten all time player.
Who was this?
 
The only thing I don't like (cheering for Blackburn in the English Championship) is that it's virtually impossible to follow the team, given I don't live in England, now that they're not in the Premier League.
 
Even more than that, there is no draft either. Every year the worst teams in all four major NA sports gets to choose the top prospects. With smart management and a some luck any team despite being a small market/cheap owner can be good. An example is the San Antonio Spurs. They probably have the best winning percentage in any of the four major sports the last 15 years. One of the reasons was getting the 1st overall pick in '97 and selecting the best power forward in NBA history and a top ten all time player.

This is dead-on, I can't even fathom that the best teams in the Euro football leagues just get to hand-pick the best players and basically outbid anyone else.

It just seems like a cultural thing though, and if Europeans are ok with it then so be it. Personally I can't imagine just rooting for a team for 30 years that bounces between "too shitty for the big time, but not that great for the small time". It's like the deck is stacked against you right from the beginning and there's no happy ending in sight.

Even the worst teams in all our sports make a decent run here and there because of the salary cap and the draft.
 
The big teams are boring, especially in uncompetitive leagues. I'm from Scotland and I bet Celtic fans have been bored all season. Knocked out of both cups and ran away with the league. It doesn't matter if they win or lose really because they already know they are better than everyone else before the season started.

Other teams have a lot to play for with Europa League for 2nd and 3rd (possibly 4th) plus 2 relegation spots mean that the league is exciting for practically everyone else.


American sports are not the same, no relegation and a playoff system that renders a lot of games meaningless. Boston have won 15 games more than the Red Wings but that means nothing in the NHL where a hot playoff streak has seen many bad teams be crowned champions. What was the point in playing all those games if you get no appreciable benefit from winning them.

Also OP can you clarify what you mean by mid level. Speaking in terms of English football do you mean a club like Aston Villa (perennially mid table, win nothing) or a club like Preston North End (Stuck in the 2nd and 3rd tiers)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom