Yup. Fuck Stern.And the league is better off for it. Fuck David Stern.
Yup. Fuck Stern.And the league is better off for it. Fuck David Stern.
I'm talking about hypothetically moving forward. Not about what happened in the past. Just wondering how that situation will be handled moving forward. You get what I mean? Let's start fresh:
Let's say Spurs coach calls someone a 'faggot' in a privately recorded conversation. Banned for life?
What has he been banned from? Is he not allowed to go to his own games? He still owns the Clippers. I think the whole "BANNED FOR LIFE" thing was just to grab headlines and put out the fire this caused. To get people to forget about the whole thing and sweep it under the rug. But at the end of the day he's still the owner of the Clippers.
There isn't much the NBA can do if he doesn't want to sell the team.
Yup. Fuck Stern.
Yeah. The 2.5M fine does more to hurt him than the ban does. Instead of being at the game he'll just watch from his comfy couch and walk away with over a billion dollars.
Who was the last major sports team owner that was forced to give up ownership? Was it DeBartolo?
I think it was Marge Schott, who was forced by MLB to sell the Cincinnati Reds because she was a Nazi sympathizer.Who was the last major sports team owner that was forced to give up ownership? Was it DeBartolo?
Unless explicitly stated in their code of conduct, this is result does not lead to an "a + b = c" kind of punishment. The punishment, in this situation, was extreme because of the person's position and because what he said was extreme.
I'm sure if a coach called or referred to a specific group of players as faggot(s) and affixed negative attributes to those players or to LGBT persons, he would get one certain punishment.
And if another coach was loose-lipped when speaking with slurs, but mostly used them as form of slang, they'd get another punishment.
Dodgers. McCourt.
There are only 30 NBA teams. Don't think that being an NBA owner is an easy fraternity to break into. There are a lot of millionaires and billionaires out there that will be lining up now to take his place.Yeah. The 2.5M fine does more to hurt him than the ban does. Instead of being at the game he'll just watch from his comfy couch and walk away with over a billion dollars.
Yeah. The 2.5M fine does more to hurt him than the ban does. Instead of being at the game he'll just watch from his comfy couch and walk away with over a billion dollars.
He is also banned from practices and personnel decisions. The GM can basically spend his money (even into luxury tax territory) as he sees fit--Sterling has been notoriously cheap in running the team and the former GM said he often interfered with personnel decisions. He also can't bring ladies into the locker room to stare at his players' bodies anymore.Yeah. The 2.5M fine does more to hurt him than the ban does. Instead of being at the game he'll just watch from his comfy couch and walk away with over a billion dollars.
What has he been banned from? Is he not allowed to go to his own games? He still owns the Clippers. I think the whole "BANNED FOR LIFE" thing was just to grab headlines and put out the fire this caused. To get people to forget about the whole thing and sweep it under the rug. But at the end of the day he's still the owner of the Clippers.
There isn't much the NBA can do if he doesn't want to sell the team.
538 did a good piece today explaining why this is so important for the league to get in front of. http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/the-clippers-like-many-nba-teams-have-a-majority-minority-fan-base/ Money graphic here- the NBA is vastly more popular among African-Americans relative to the general population (1.0) and really required them to make those fans comfortable that the league was looking out for their interests. (In addition to the obvious "right thing to do" rationale.)I don't know why anyone cares about how much this punishes Sterling from his perspective. The NBA wanted him out; separated completely from them. They'll keep him away from everything and then force him to sell his team, severing every tie they possibly can. No one should give a shit if this makes Donald Sterling feel bad or good or makes him money.
Dodgers. McCourt.
538 did a good piece today explaining why this is so important for the league to get in front of. http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/the-clippers-like-many-nba-teams-have-a-majority-minority-fan-base/ Money graphic here- the NBA is vastly more popular among African-Americans relative to the general population (1.0) and really required them to make those fans comfortable that the league was looking out for their interests. (In addition to the obvious "right thing to do" rationale.)
![]()
Was he actually forced to sell the team? I mean the Dodgers filed for bankruptcy, because of his stupid divorce he literally didn't have enough money to pay his players.
I think the situation forced him to sell more than the league.
When you can get rid of anthem singer, you've got power.
Banned for life
at 81
better than the former penalty of nothing though
Yeah. The 2.5M fine does more to hurt him than the ban does. Instead of being at the game he'll just watch from his comfy couch and walk away with over a billion dollars.
Whoa when did Kevin Johnson get into politics?
![]()
Rush got shafted from buying the St. Louis Rams for something like the same reason (being a racist shithead) so yeah I can see why he thinks it's a conspiracy.
The only thing that actually hurt him was his name being on this shit.
People will remember him as a racist prick and his wealth cant change that.
They can absolutely bar him from going to games or league events and the other owners explicitly have the power to force him out with a vote.
RUSH: Whoever set this up is really good. They covered every base. They've got the media wrapped around their little finger. I mean when you get rid of the anthem singer, I used to be in charge of anthem singers at the Kansas City Royals. When you can get rid of anthem singer, you've got power.
He's the mayor of the capitol of California.
My guess is it will be pretty hard to force someone out when they OWN a team.
It will go to court and by the time a real decision is made, no one will care about this story anymore.
No it doesn't. Being an owner and appearing on national TV sitting courtside are huge parts of the draw of owning a team. His ego fed on that. Now it's gone.
Exactly. The man is broken now.
![]()
Conspiracy lol
I'm sure the commissioner and the other 29 owners thought long and hard about this....I have no doubt they were trying to find some sort of evidence to exonerate the guy. Clearly they found none and did what they had to do.
Well all the "conspirators" had to do was get the ball rolling. The owners had to do what they would have to do to protect the leagues image. Whether or not you believe it was a conspiracy the way it all came to pass was definitely a set up.
Well all the "conspirators" had to do was get the ball rolling. The owners had to do what they would have to do to protect the leagues image. Whether or not you believe it was a conspiracy the way it went about was definitely a set up.
My guess is it will be pretty hard to force someone out when they OWN a team.
It will go to court and by the time a real decision is made, no one will care about this story anymore.
Exactly. The man is broken now.
![]()
Excellent! The sooner these racist pricks are thoroughly discredited the better.
Went over to the Yahoo comments sections to see how they are coping, and as
expected: freedom of speech! where are his rights!? Obama ruined the country!