This was an interesting read from someone named Lenny Shaw who spent a little bit of time talking with Elliot Rodger.
https://www.facebook.com/lenny.shaw.5/posts/10203423576165066?fref=nf
First post here so I'm not sure I did that link correctly. Sorry.
Yeah, interesting read, thanks for that - I've been waiting to hear more from people who actually knew him (especially his family, but that might take a long while)
This person is saying "it was mental illness, nothing else", though, when it probably was more of a mix of things. People cite mental illness as the critical factor, rather than the misogyny, the guns, the videogames, whatever.
Shooting cases where there's a link to violent videogames? The defense is pretty much airtight nowadays- "don't blame violent videogames, it was mental illness. Not all gamers are violent'. Okay.
Shooting cases where there's an irresponsible ease of access to firearms? NRA people come out, "don't blame guns, it was mental illness. Not all gun owners are criminals, guns don't kill people", etc. Okay.
So what's the defense for the blatant misogyny? Don't blame misogyny? Not all misogynists are violent? Leave the hateful women-hating people and communities out of this? Misogyny is okay as long as it's not in the wrong hands?
While a 1st and 2nd Amendment argument may be made in favor guns and violent media, "our freedoms", I don't see the point in defending misogyny, or excusing it because it was the fault of mental illness.