• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

IGN: The Last Guardian cancelled, mayhaps; Sony: Nope - Stage XI: Mole Hunt

Who should be banned from NeoGAF?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Because... teh clicks!

Ad revenue stream Aqua, you said so yourself ;)

And give up the ad revenue? IGN would never.

EUElZZN.png




I love how, despite the update to the article, it still appears on IGN's homepage in a way that maximizes clicks / ad revenue.

Screw you, IGN. You really should have just deleted your stupid article.
 
Is this the storm before the calm before shit hits the fan? Because that's what I feel like it is. Tomorrow / today will be the eye of the storm then crazy shit happens. I can dream.

Tomorrow Sony will post a TLG teaser image, break GAF - then fail to say a goddamn thing about it for another 7 years.
 
I mean, let's run down the possibilities here:

1) It's true and Sony doesn't want to say anything yet, so they issued a denial.

2) It's not true but IGN was lead to believe it through usually credible sources that were themselves given wrong or incomplete information.

3) It's not true and IGN took very weak sources and ran with them irresponsibly.

The third one is a really, really heavy accusation and basically torpedoes them as a news source. It's possible, but would have had to be done damn near drunkenly for an editor to post it.

The second one seems the most likely to me. I don't really buy the "Sony was trying to root out leakers" theory, but I can easily see people just getting it wrong. If this is the case and IGN didn't knowingly put up a false story, they might be trying to find out where in the chain the information breakdown happened before they acknowledge it as false.

Exactly. 1 and 2 seem probably, because I somehow doubt IGN is dumb enough to run without being certain of it.
 
To me, at a functional level, I'm always skeptical about western press finding out information on Japanese-developed games.

I mean, how often do we find out detailed stuff about what goes on in Japan, as far as development goes?

A western press member reporting on a Japanese developed game through a source in Russia.....wow
 
How do you explain them altering the 'original' article from 'sources' to 'source'?

If I had to guess what would make me make a change like that, it would probably be if I ran it by some sources to confirm, one was sure and one was sort of "That sounds right, I heard about that," and the second got pensive and changed their mind after the story ran.
 
I mean, let's run down the possibilities here:

1) It's true and Sony doesn't want to say anything yet, so they issued a denial.

2) It's not true but IGN was lead to believe it through usually credible sources that were themselves given wrong or incomplete information.

3) It's not true and IGN took very weak sources and ran with them irresponsibly.

The third one is a really, really heavy accusation and basically torpedoes them as a news source. It's possible, but would have had to be done damn near drunkenly for an editor to post it.

The second one seems the most likely to me. I don't really buy the "Sony was trying to root out leakers" theory, but I can easily see people just getting it wrong. If this is the case and IGN didn't knowingly put up a false story, they might be trying to find out where in the chain the information breakdown happened before they acknowledge it as false.

Realistically it's looking like option 2.
 
Man, IGN is such a shithole. If Scott Rhodes is saying the game is not cancelled, why the hell would they stick to the story? That's fucking high source right there.
 
There it is. That's the look. We've seen it for seven years on post after post. You all despise us. Cynics. Disbelievers. Mods with an anti-Sony bias. You've heard of rumours? The forum was obsessed with them. They loved to watch gamers and press burn, the way their hopes blackened, blistered, melted off their words. They burned developers they didn't like; they burned publishers that disobeyed them; they burned anyone that was against them. Before long, half PR community was against them. NeoGAF saw traitors everywhere, so they had their posters place caches of rumours all over the forum: beneath gaming discussion, the slums of off topic, under posts, titles, avatars, even beneath the Community OT itself. Finally, the day of reckoning came. IGN marched upon the forum after the cancellation at the Team Ico. But Scott Rohde arrived first with the whole Sony army at his back, promising that The Last Guardian still existed. We knew Sony better than that. They've never been one to bank on development hell. We told NeoGAF as much. We urged them to move on. But the forum didn't listen to us, didn't listen to the mods who tried to warn them. But they did listen to Yosp, that grey sunken cunt. "You can trust Sony," he said. "Team Ico has always been developing The Last Guardian." So, we opened discussion and Rohde sacked the forum. Once again qw came to the forum begging them to see reality. They told us to bring them IGN's head. Then they turned to each other, "Ban them all," they said. "Ban them on our forum, ban them in their URLs." Tell us, if your precious community commanded you to ban a popular source of gaming coverage and stand by while thousands of men women and children anticipated a title stuck in development hell, would you have done it? Would you have kept your oath then? First, we changed the thread title, and then when the posters turned to flee we added a stupid poll. "Ban them all!," they kept saying. "Ban them all!" I don't think they expected it to be at E3. They meant to wait for as long as necessary with the rest of us and watch The Last Guardian rise again, reborn as a PlayStation 4 title. We kept the thread open to make sure that didn't happen.
So you're saying The Last Guardian is cancelled??
 
So all of the typical shitty journalists are continuing to be shit at their job (though, honestly, I like Steve Butts. It's the attitude of Gies, McCaffrey and Moriarty that annoy me the most. All we're missing are Kuchera and Dyer.), we still know nothing about The Last Guardian, and Kyle Bosman still rules.

Only way all of this turns out worthwhile is if it forces Sony's hand somehow.
 
He probably realizes that they fucked up, and realizes the site needs to own up to it.

I think both Greg and Colin are great guys. But I don't think retweeting the editor in chief of another website is the way to send the message.

Case in point:

Oe0HTDJ.jpg


They really don't take any of this seriously.
 
It suddenly all makes sense. First we hear that Gamestop could be open longer during E3 and now we have IGN saying TLG has been cancelled. Conclusion: Sony will end their conference with TLG and the final screen will say it is out now!

No chance of this actually happening
 
I'm just outlining the two scenarios we're faced with right now.

The first scenario isn't realistic. What internal meeting at WWS is going to reach IGN before it reaches Shu and Rohde? What internal meeting at WWS wouldn't include Shu and Rohde for that matter? If TLG is cancelled, that means Rohde is simply lying because he would absolutely know for a fact.
 
Loooool

OT - This thread is amazing shame I don't get to live here earlier.
That reply pwnage. IGN being IGN again trying to push rumours as official news.




Shit what a idiot. Thank god for gaf am not visiting IGN again for a long while. What a shitty site sometimes.



YH pretty gross a site trying to mislead people by pushing a rumor as official news and still trying to do so when it was denied officially. YH shame us.

McCaffrey didn't write the article genius, he was just going with what his Editor In Chief wrote, and that was posted BEFORE Rhode's tweet. Calm the hell down
 
IGN seems to be doubling down. Ya they posted the "update", but the headline has no such edit.

I really do want to hear how they got this information, as they seem to have confidence in it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom