great headline
![]()
Ahahahahahhahahahahhaha. Headline of the year.
great headline
![]()
Lavezzi?This is the weakest attacking Uruguay team in history. What on earth happened to Cavanni? Lavezzi devolved into a sub. And Suarez can't stop biting people and will probably not play. I'll take a perma ban if Columbia doesn't beat them by 2 points. Quote me on this.
I think if you open up the can of worms that is banning players after the fact you'd get a whole bunch of different WC outcomes with people complaining from all sides possible. All im saying.
Should have been called on the field? YES, as any other foul play.
I think if you open up the can of worms that is banning players after the fact you'd get a whole bunch of different WC outcomes with people complaining from all sides possible. All im saying.
Should have been called on the field? YES, as any other foul play.
Now I'm really dead. This is too much.
You know nothing. Post match banning has been a thing forever if the referee hasn't seen it.I think if you open up the can of worms that is banning players after the fact you'd get a whole bunch of different WC outcomes with people complaining from all sides possible. All im saying.
Should have been called on the field? YES, as any other foul play.
great headline
![]()
In 2010 the illegal action he performed was sanctioned while in the game. So i don't see how it's a comparable situation.
not uruguayan but I still can't believe the salt over the 2010. The guy got a red card (e.g. was PUNISHED) by the handball. The Ghana player missed the penalty after that. Had he scored, nobody would've given a shit about the handball. There's a difference between that and biting somebody.
That's because the ref didn't see it, not because he didn't do anything about it.if Suarez doesn't even get a warning for biting someone, Machisio doesn't deserve a red lmao
Enjoy your stay, you guys are great. Blatter agrees.yeah you are, you just got taken out
wowowow
Those were left by his bottom row of teeth. Bite came from behind.
I don't know if you were aware but punishing players after the fact has happened plenty of times before.
You know nothing. Post match banning has been a thing forever if the referee hasn't seen it.
In every single league in the world, for at least the last 10-15 years.
Lavezzi?
I think if you open up the can of worms that is banning players after the fact you'd get a whole bunch of different WC outcomes with people complaining from all sides possible. All im saying.
Should have been called on the field? YES, as any other foul play. What happens now is beyond the point im making about this match.
This is the weakest attacking Uruguay team in history. What on earth happened to Cavanni? Lavezzi devolved into a sub. And Suarez can't stop biting people and will probably not play. I'll take a perma ban if Columbia doesn't beat them by 2 points. Quote me on this.
bite marks look like the same shop from every angle
tabloids gonna tabloid, im not convinced. we'll find out in a while.
I could care less about the bite marks: he did what he did
for the umpteenth time: im not defending him and im from Uruguay
I think if you open up the can of worms that is banning players after the fact you'd get a whole bunch of different WC outcomes with people complaining from all sides possible. All im saying.
Should have been called on the field? YES, as any other foul play. What happens now is beyond the point im making about this match.
when did I say I was not aware? I just think it's a can of worms and that FIFA and any league is very delicate about it.
Soccer rules are shit in many aspects and many things need to change. No one's denying that.
Pfff. Are you trying to pull a David Hayter "I'm not in Metal Gear 5, true story" or something?
Perma me if Columbia doesn't win 5-0, with every single goal being preceded by a front flip over a defending player.
social media blows up if Suarez farts after eating a sandwich
not saying he's not being an asshole, but he has the biggest tabloid target on his back, no need to make decisions based on that
Perma me if Columbia doesn't win 5-0, with every single goal being preceded by a front flip over a defending player.
I think if you open up the can of worms that is banning players after the fact you'd get a whole bunch of different WC outcomes with people complaining from all sides possible. All im saying.
Should have been called on the field? YES, as any other foul play. What happens now is beyond the point im making about this match.
regardless of anyone's opinion on the banning matter I just honestly think it won't happen, which is what im saying.
never said it should or shouldnt
HAHA wtf? Did that ref really ask for Robben's shirt?
So what does GAF reckon, did Machisio deserve a red card for his kick? Or would a yellow have been more than enough?
Why not just come out and say you think Suarez should be suspended. You know deep in your heart it's true but you don't want to because your team needs him and you don't want to lose.
But in any other situation you know what you would be thinking and saying.
when did I say I was not aware? I just think it's a can of worms and that FIFA and any league is very delicate about it.
Soccer rules are shit in many aspects and many things need to change. No one's denying that.
regardless of anyone's opinion on the banning matter I just honestly think it won't happen, which is what im saying.
never said it should or shouldnt
Oh, it'll definitely happen, I'm just worried FIFA come up with some "we'll look at the incident after the WC" crap.regardless of anyone's opinion on the banning matter I just honestly think it won't happen, which is what im saying.
never said it should or shouldnt
regardless of anyone's opinion on the banning matter I just honestly think it won't happen, which is what im saying.
never said it should or shouldnt
So let's say if someone knocks someone in a coma but the ref doesn't make the call, you can't punish the player later?
Go home Salsa, you're drunk.
Except that it can, because it happened before in 2006 with Frings.