But he keeps doing it. If someone doesn't respond to punishment, does that not necessitate a ban?
It depends on your perspective on the actual act itself. I don't find the act monstrous, I find it stupid and juvenile. I don't think it's worthy, despite him doing it for the third time in his career, of an all encompassing ban. I think missing out on the rest of the World Cup and, perhaps, an extended international ban to be sufficient punishment. Oh yes, and ensure he wears a gum shield at all times during matches from now on.
I found his racist abuse of Evra more destructive, disgusting and monstrous than what he did during the Italy game. Repeat behaviour of that would be worthy of an all encompassing ban.
The words of a man that has never been properly bitten by another human
"Well you see, I was playing this football match..."Pray tell, how did you get bitten?
The words of a man that has never been properly bitten by another human
I'm sat in McDonald's right now what would happen if I bit the girl infront of me on the shoulder?
I'm sat in McDonald's right now what would happen if I bit the girl infront of me on the shoulder?
I'm sat in McDonald's right now what would happen if I bit the girl infront of me on the shoulder?
Youd be arrested most probably.
I think it would depend on how hot he is.
I'm sat in McDonald's right now what would happen if I bit the girl infront of me on the shoulder?
I'm sat in McDonald's right now what would happen if I bit the girl infront of me on the shoulder?
... a charge of assault occasioning actual bodily harm could be brought if the alleged bite did damage, such as breaking the skin, causing bleeding or leaving a mark, but a charge of common assault, to be heard without a jury in a magistrate's court, would be more likely.
Assuming a prosecution for common assault then, what kind of sentence would Suárez expect if he were convicted in England? "You're not looking at anything particularly high. If he hasn't got any form for it, not more than a community order, I would imagine. Unpaid work, perhaps between 180 and 240 hours. Since it was such a public offence a court might want to send a warning. An anger-management programme could be an option."
But of course Suárez does have form. So what would happen if he had two previous convictions for biting? "With assault you are still very rarely looking at custody, but if the offences are very similar and he clearly isn't learning from his experience in the courts, they could well think that it does cross the custody threshold. And they could suspend any custodial sentence. You'd be looking at a short one, though. A matter of weeks."
Some of the gifs I made:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not a lot basically
That's ignoring the fact that stuff happens all the time in football games that would be handled totally differently if it occurred outside a football game, so using that as an argument isn't really fair
Truly the most embarrassing of sports.
Truly the most embarrassing of sports.
indeed
apparently you wouldnt get arrested if you were in Mcdonalds and suddenly tackled a guy's leg and injured it
a bite is completely out of place and ridiculous, as anyone following this can see, but the jail argument is silly talk and full of holes. it's a physical sport like many others, some stuff allowed and some isnt, some stuff gets punished and some isnt, but saying it should be treated the same way as something in a completely different and mundane context... wut
To me, it does need to be treated differently to the usual deliberate fouls - it should be in the same box alongside headbutts or elbows - i.e physical assault.
FIFA not agreeing to a decision at first hearing is good news for Suarez
Salsa still full in denial mode, this is truly embarrassing.
oh im not arguing that, im talking about the jail comments
Uruguay legend says Suarez deserves a ban
Posted at 10:19
Alcides Ghiggia
Uruguay have spent the past 24 hours or so rallying around their star striker Luis Suarez.
But it seems not everyone associated with the national team is on his side after his alleged bite on Giorgio Chiellini.
Alcides Ghiggia, the man who scored the winning goal for Uruguay in the 1950 World Cup against Brazil, says Suarez deserves a ban.
"I think a ban could be applied here because it's unheard of," Ghiggia, 87, said.
"I don't know what this kid thinks and what goes through his head. Whether you're Uruguayan or of an other nationality, you always have to reproach these things on the field, this is not a war."
I think physical assault could be considered a special case. Hacking the legs out from under someone is a blatant foul, but punching/headbutting/biting has the potential to be considered common assault with accompanying criminal charges.
I think there were cases in the UK of criminal charges being sought against footballers? Can't remember completely though. The FA would probably have tried to keep it all in-house though.
denial of what dude?
b-b-b-b-but
pretty much word for word what others on TV have said. took being a maracanazo hero to get picked up by the international media I guess
I met Ghiggia about 5 years ago, nicest guy
I love how he calls hims 'this kid'.... :lol
b-b-b-b-but
pretty much word for word what others on TV have said. took being a maracanazo hero to get picked up by the international media I guess
I met Ghiggia about 5 years ago, nicest guy
Uruguay have spent the past 24 hours or so rallying around their star striker Luis Suarez.
All reports I'm seeing in the media seem to be saying that almost all media there is defending him. Could you link some of these articles that aren't defending him?
All reports I'm seeing in the media seem to be saying that almost all media there is defending him. Could you link some of these articles that aren't defending him?
sports columns have reported the same statements here without bias. what's been said by Lugano for example is what it is
what im talking about is opinionated reporters and sports commentators/journalists on national TV, which sadly I cant link
take my word for it! or dont
saying "all media in uruguay" is as ridiculous as saying Fox News' opinion on something represents the entire US. Just because we're less people doesnt mean we're a 1 approach sheep
Sounds good. In trying to be funny you found the solution.Clearly the denial that Suarez should be evicted from planet earth and made to spend the rest of his days on the moon, in an isolation chamber, preferably with the rest of your country who condone his actions. And since all of you condone his actions (apart from that one guy) then I'm afraid Uruguay and its people are just going to have to adapt to life on the moon.
might as well give it up Salsa.
denial of what dude?
54,000+ posts....Sweet Jesus SalsaShark.
Don't think I've ever seen anyone on any forum any where on the internet have that many posts.
Juventus fan, that's the problem.I'm Italian (even if Juventus is the only team i support, could care less about the national team) and i still love Luis Suarez as much as i loved him before this.
He might be a dick, but he's a damn amazing striker, i'd LOVE to see him in my team.
Juventus fan, that's the problem.
That's you projecting. You're not stupid. You know it's about your media and everyone involved in your team.all im discussing here is the ridiculous notion of an entire country having one opinion. apparently the thread is as much about Uruguay as it is about Suarez
lol, you got me.Admit it bro, you'd love it if he played for Napoli![]()
give up what? you guys are acting if I was all "LOL SUAREZ DID NOTHING"
look at what im posting and what im talking about
same answer as this:
all im discussing here is the ridiculous notion of an entire country having one opinion. apparently the thread is as much about Uruguay as it is about Suarez