I'm taking it with a grain of salt.
Is there a link to the whole video? I'm hesitant of taking this at face value due to an apparent smear campaign against this agency.
Here's the documentary.
http://youtu.be/jQvUZDiYSzc
I'm taking it with a grain of salt.
Is there a link to the whole video? I'm hesitant of taking this at face value due to an apparent smear campaign against this agency.
The right to defend oneself includes bombing of hospitals and religous places without any kind of evidence of weapons right?I do support Israel's right to defend themselves rather than just sit there and continue to be bombarded without response.
What is United States' policy when it is occupied?Let me be clear here, I am not justifying the killing of 500 innocent civilians. What Israel did was a blatant overreaction to the rockets being fired into their cities.
But, it sends a strong stance that Israel will not be trifled with or terrorized. The United States acts in a similar manner, you hit us, we hit harder back. I do not support this in any circumstances, however, I do support Israel's right to defend themselves rather than just sit there and continue to be bombarded without response.
Let me be clear here, I am not justifying the killing of 500 innocent civilians. What Israel did was a blatant overreaction to the rockets being fired into their cities.
But, it sends a strong stance that Israel will not be trifled with or terrorized. The United States acts in a similar manner, you hit us, we hit harder back. I do not support this in any circumstances, however, I do support Israel's right to defend themselves rather than just sit there and continue to be bombarded without response.
Let me be clear here, I am not justifying the killing of 500 innocent civilians. What Israel did was a blatant overreaction to the rockets being fired into their cities.
But, it sends a strong stance that Israel will not be trifled with or terrorized. The United States acts in a similar manner, you hit us, we hit harder back. I do not support this in any circumstances, however, I do support Israel's right to defend themselves rather than just sit there and continue to be bombarded without response.
The right to defend oneself includes bombing of hospitals and religous places without any kind of evidence of weapons right?
You know, how about Israel first stop illegal settlements, treating Gentiles as second grade humans, stops terrorizing people in the west bank, stop treating 2 million people in the strip as prisoners and then we can talk about a right to defend.Let me be clear here, I am not justifying the killing of 500 innocent civilians. What Israel did was a blatant overreaction to the rockets being fired into their cities.
But, it sends a strong stance that Israel will not be trifled with or terrorized. The United States acts in a similar manner, you hit us, we hit harder back. I do not support this in any circumstances, however, I do support Israel's right to defend themselves rather than just sit there and continue to be bombarded without response.
Let me be clear here, I am not justifying the killing of 500 innocent civilians. What Israel did was a blatant overreaction to the rockets being fired into their cities.
But, it sends a strong stance that Israel will not be trifled with or terrorized. The United States acts in a similar manner, you hit us, we hit harder back. I do not support this in any circumstances, however, I do support Israel's right to defend themselves rather than just sit there and continue to be bombarded without response.
How do you know that there is no evidence of weaponry? The IDF could have military intelligence that leads them to target specific areas.
Again, I do not support these acts and they are a blatant and callous overreaction to the attacks on Israel.
Or is that source no longer reliable enough for you?UNRWA said:This is a flagrant violation of the inviolability of its premises under international law. This incident, which is the first of its kind in Gaza, endangered civilians including staff and put at risk UNRWA’s vital mission to assist and protect Palestine refugees in Gaza.
UNRWA has strong, established procedures to maintain the neutrality of all its premises, including a strict no-weapons policy and routine inspections of its installations, to ensure they are only used for humanitarian purposes. UNRWA will uphold and further reinforce its procedures.
How do you know that there is no evidence of weaponry? The IDF could have military intelligence that leads them to target specific areas.
Again, I do not support these acts and they are a blatant and callous overreaction to the attacks on Israel.
From your own source:
Or is that source no longer reliable enough for you?
Like a beach for example?
....You know, how about Israel first stop illegal settlements, treating Gentiles as second grade humans, stops terrorizing people in the west bank, stop treating 2 million people in the strip as prisoners and then we can talk about a right to defend.
Right now, Israel is acting like a rapist that claims it should defend itself against the victim, because the victim is not succumbing to its fate.
Nonetheless, Israel has the power to use alternative methods to end this farce [e.g. having proper peace negotiations with Palestinians], so it has the responsibility to do so.
Fuck that. Fuck a message for five hundred lives. That's cold-hearted, sociopathic justification for senseless murder. IDF kills Hamas soldiers I have no problem with that. That's war. It's terrible, but it's the way it is. They leveled people's homes, slaughtered entire families... to send a fucking message? That's the thought process of Osama Bin Laden. No country should ever take that stance. That's Genghis Khan raising a pile of heads to send a message to his enemies. It's barbaric.Let me be clear here, I am not justifying the killing of 500 innocent civilians. What Israel did was a blatant overreaction to the rockets being fired into their cities.
But, it sends a strong stance that Israel will not be trifled with or terrorized. The United States acts in a similar manner, you hit us, we hit harder back. I do not support this in any circumstances, however, I do support Israel's right to defend themselves rather than just sit there and continue to be bombarded without response.
Nurit Peled-Elhanan, an Israeli academic, mother and political radical, summons up an image of rows of Jewish schoolchildren, bent over their books, learning about their neighbours, the Palestinians. But, she says, they are never referred to as Palestinians unless the context is terrorism.
They are called Arabs. "The Arab with a camel, in an Ali Baba dress. They describe them as vile and deviant and criminal, people who don't pay taxes, people who live off the state, people who don't want to develop," she says. "The only representation is as refugees, primitive farmers and terrorists. You never see a Palestinian child or doctor or teacher or engineer or modern farmer."
"People don't really know what their children are reading in textbooks," she said. "One question that bothers many people is how do you explain the cruel behaviour of Israeli soldiers towards Palestinians, an indifference to human suffering, the inflicting of suffering. People ask how can these nice Jewish boys and girls become monsters once they put on a uniform. I think the major reason for that is education. So I wanted to see how school books represent Palestinians."
In "hundreds and hundreds" of books, she claims she did not find one photograph that depicted an Arab as a "normal person". The most important finding in the books she studied – all authorised by the ministry of education – concerned the historical narrative of events in 1948, the year in which Israel fought a war to establish itself as an independent state, and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled the ensuing conflict.
The killing of Palestinians is depicted as something that was necessary for the survival of the nascent Jewish state, she claims. "It's not that the massacres are denied, they are represented in Israeli school books as something that in the long run was good for the Jewish state. For example, Deir Yassin [a pre-1948 Palestinian village close to Jerusalem] was a terrible slaughter by Israeli soldiers. In school books they tell you that this massacre initiated the massive flight of Arabs from Israel and enabled the establishment of a Jewish state with a Jewish majority. So it was for the best. Maybe it was unfortunate, but in the long run the consequences for us were good."
Children, she says, grow up to serve in the army and internalise the message that Palestinians are "people whose life is dispensable with impunity. And not only that, but people whose number has to be diminished."
"Everything they do, from kindergarten to 12th grade, they are fed in all kinds of ways, through literature and songs and holidays and recreation, with these chauvinistic patriotic notions."
Google Dahiya Doctrine. Intimidation is part of IDF's strategy.Fuck that. Fuck a message for five hundred lives. That's cold-hearted, sociopathic justification for senseless murder. IDF kills Hamas soldiers I have no problem with that. That's war. It's terrible, but it's the way it is. They leveled people's homes, slaughtered entire families... to send a fucking message? That's the thought process of Osama Bin Laden. No country should ever take that stance. That's Genghis Khan raising a pile of heads to send a message to his enemies. It's barbaric.
Let me be clear here, I am not justifying the killing of 500 innocent civilians. What Israel did was a blatant overreaction to the rockets being fired into their cities.
But, it sends a strong stance that Israel will not be trifled with or terrorized. The United States acts in a similar manner, you hit us, we hit harder back. I do not support this in any circumstances, however, I do support Israel's right to defend themselves rather than just sit there and continue to be bombarded without response.
That the United Nations knows of?
CHEEZMO™;122019514 said:So.. the murder of 500 innocent civilians is entirely deliberate and is part of a campaign of collective punishment? That is what you're saying?
Unlike yours however, it isn't from a highly biased source.[/URL]
At a press conference releasing the PMW report in the US Senate building in February 2007, then US Senator Hillary Clinton said:
These textbooks do not give Palestinian children an education; they give them an indoctrination. When we viewed this [PMW] report in combination with other media [from other PMW reports] that these children are exposed to, we see a larger picture that is disturbing. It is disturbing on a human level, it is disturbing to me as a mother, it is disturbing to me as a United States Senator, because it basically, profoundly poisons the minds of these children.
You are a vile human being.
That is the only logical conclusion I can surmise as to why Israel would act with such strong measures. Israel claims that they are hiding weaponry in places of peace and worship, but that doesn't explain the beach bombings and other counterattacks they made over the past week.
If we know anything about Israel, is that they will not be bullied into making concessions.
Mind explaining why? I already said I do not support the strikes in civilian territories under any circumstances.
I'm just trying to rationalize in my mind Israel's thought process behind it.
bullied
Vire is making me hate ellie's face with his mental gymanstics to defend Israel.
You are severely in error if you believe Hamas is the 'cause' of the conflict between Israel and the rest of Palestinians, just look at the west bank, they do not have Hamas.....
I guess those kids in the video are just actors.
And if you want to talk about schooling,
The full report is available here.
By placing these weapons in civilian territories they are endangering civilians. As the announcement stated, this is a flagrant violation of international law.
The man, wearing a green shirt and black pants, was reportedly shot by a sniper while trying to cross an alleyway in between two buildings. Soon after, he is shot by two additional rounds while on the ground.
By placing these weapons in civilian territories they are endangering civilians. As the announcement stated, this is a flagrant violation of international law.
Once you start rationalizing why an army level civilian homes and kill 500 innocent human beings, you need to start being more introspective.I'm not defending their actions, I'm trying to rationalize and understand what they did. It's the only way I can cope with all of this.
We had that ourage a couple hours ago already. It's saddening and enraging.https://news.vice.com/article/cellp...d-killed-by-sniper?utm_source=vicenewstwitter
Something has to be done
In the building palestinians aren't allowed to begin with of course.Where should Hamas place the weapons?
/search heart ... error errorOnce you start rationalizing why an army level civilian homes and kill 500 innocent human beings, you need to start being more introspective.
https://news.vice.com/article/cellp...d-killed-by-sniper?utm_source=vicenewstwitter
Something has to be done
We had that ourage a couple hours ago already. It's saddening and enraging.
In the building palestinians aren't allowed to begin with of course.
Oh, cut the crap. As if you give 2 flying fucks about "international law".
People like you, who pick and choose which violations of international they decide outraged about, while simultaneously and absolutely defending this slaughter, are absolutely hilarious. I'm glad the 200 splattered bodies of dead children in the past few days (never-mind the brutal occupation, experimental banned weapons, and the thousand of instances of Israel disregarding international law) doesn't fit that criteria for you.
I wasn't serious, making a joke about Vire's idiotic statement. The sentence is pretty self-explanatory with "not" and "of course".where do you find such a building in a strip with 10,000 people per square mile?
Once you start rationalizing why an army level civilian homes and kill 500 innocent human beings, you need to start being more introspective.
Wow...
So is anyone going to defend the use of white phosphorous (again) or flechette shells?
....
Stunning how fucking disconnected you seem to be, posting spurious propaganda about kids being taught to hate Israel, while the world is outraged at the current slaughter and destruction being brought down on kids and innocents in Gaza. Don't you think, that just MAYBE, this carnage is what promotes Israeli hate, and the shit you just linked? Why, exactly, do you think thats relevant at this time? How utterly and completely crass. Do you know how real, justifiable hate is created? By seeing bodies of your loved ones blown to pieces, and the images we've seeing from Gaza the past week. Israel is creating more potential for radicalization and deep, long-term hatred than a million of these supposed camps ever could. I can't understand what kind of person is unable to see that.
It's also despicable how you pretend this doesnt happen on the other side. Israeli leaders call for genocide. Crowds gather with popcorn on Israeli hills to applaud the Gaza bombs. Israeli kids are made to sign missiles that will soon rip palestinian kids to shreds. And these are people who have suffered an iota of a fraction of what Gazans have suffered.
Oh no, oh no. This is such a shit.
As far as I read the thread, the pro-israelis just ignore that part.So is anyone going to defend the use of white phosphorous (again) or flechette shells?
....
After the previous thread, I'm surprised people bother responding to Pilgor. lol
Wow...
I'm not defending their actions, I'm trying to rationalize and understand what they did. It's the only way I can cope with all of this.
So, so hard to cope. Truly, Vire is the real victim in all this.
Have you given equal, almost flow chart like justification for Hamas actions? Have you tried to rationalize equally both sides? All I hear is an excuse for IDF after an excuse, with all the evidence pointing to the contrary.I think people are misunderstanding where I am coming from in my viewpoint. As I have mentioned countless times in this thread, I don't condone any action on innocent civilians Israel has taken in response.
My point was to have an open discussion in trying to understand why they would act in such measures. I was playing "devil's advocate" to try and discuss the other side of the coin instead of a decidedly one sided discussion. I am not personally taking sides.