UN Shelter in Gaza is hit by Israeli rocket fire leaving several people dead/injured

Status
Not open for further replies.
Saying ~What do you expect them to do~ is not the same as condoning. Were you placed in a similar situation, and seeing how the good behavior of the west bank still results in Israel stealing Palestinian land, would you not lash out how you could against an overwhelming and seemingly inevitable foe that was slowly strangling you out and keeping you in a prison?

Hmm. I'll have to read up on that but I was under the impression that this was not exactly the case.
 
And whenever Hamas fires rockets haphazardly towards civilian areas, it's always "But they're being oppressed, so what else do you expect them to do?"

People who are invested in either side are so delusively self-righteous that they don't realize how hypocritical they are being.

Its a completely legitimate response. To understand why Hamas is firing rockets is not to condone it. When your land is stolen,economy crippled, family members killed, compatriots arrested and basic human rights violated it is not difficult to understand why the palestinians are so desperate. Israel have consistantly refused the reasonable proposals by Hamas that would help to end the conflict. Their response has been completely disproportionate to the rockets fired.
 
Its a completely legitimate response. To understand why Hamas is firing rockets is not to condone it. When your land is stolen,economy crippled, family members killed, compatriots arrested and basic human rights violated it is not difficult to understand why the palestinians are so desperate. Israel have consistantly refused the reasonable proposals by Hamas that would help to end the conflict. Their response has been completely disproportionate to the rockets fired.

One thing I don't get is, why fire the rockets in the first place? They aren't going to hurt a technologically superior nation. All it does is make Israel invade.

Unless...maybe they are doing this to force international intervention.

i.e. no rocket fire is coming from the West Bank and what they get in return is more settlements, checkpoints, and walls.

I'm going to read up on it myself thanks. My guess is it's not going to be quite so simple.
 
Hmm. I'll have to read up on that but I was under the impression that this was not exactly the case.
West Band under Fatah has a security cooperation agreement. West Bank still sees the expansion of settlements, collective punishment, destruction of property, mass arrests without charges or due process, military checkpoints, Palestinians killed and displaced weekly. Isreal provides no reason for the people if Gaza to seek an alternative because they can look to the West Bank and see capitulation is met with more oppression.
 
Its a completely legitimate response. To understand why Hamas is firing rockets is not to condone it. When your land is stolen,economy crippled, family members killed, compatriots arrested and basic human rights violated it is not difficult to understand why the palestinians are so desperate. Israel have consistantly refused the reasonable proposals by Hamas that would help to end the conflict. Their response has been completely disproportionate to the rockets fired.

That is just more rationalizing. The opposite response would be "I don't condone civilian casualties, but what do you expect Israel to do, weather an unending rain of rockets on their civilian population?" I don't think you would accept that explanation.
 
West Band under Fatah has a security cooperation agreement. West Bank still sees the expansion of settlements, collective punishment, destruction of property, mass arrests without charges or due process, military checkpoints, Palestinians killed and displaced weekly. Isreal provides no reason for the people if Gaza to seek an alternative because they can look to the West Bank and see capitulation is met with more oppression.

Again I am going to read up on it myself. This is something too complicated to just take the word of forum posters. There is likely something else going on when Hamas doesn't even recognize the legitimacy of Israel.

If I am wrong then I will have no problem being wrong. I had self-righteousness beaten out of me a while ago.
 
A little reading and it will become clear why Hamas does not recognize Israel.

Whoa. Not recognizing Israel is not going to solve this. I am going to spend my commute time with some solid Audible audio-books on the subject.

This was linked a handful of times. It's pretty lengthy but it has some good information you might find useful. It might not answer everything but it's a good place to start.

http://www.vox.com/cards/israel-palestine/intro

TY I'll print and read on the train.
 
It is more so PR, they are not required under international law to recognize Israel, and it does not prohibit any deals being made or a settlement being reached (unless Israel mandates it as a condition out of spite).

That is just more rationalizing. The opposite response would be "I don't condone civilian casualties, but what do you expect Israel to do, weather an unending rain of rockets on their civilian population?" I don't think you would accept that explanation.

That is a decent point, but I would counter it by saying that the two scales are not remotely equal, and were I in the shoes of Israel I would handle the situation differently. In the situation of Hamas (who allegedly [would really like some more info on this] honored by a two year cease fire and tried to prevent splinter groups from launching missiles), or the palestinians to be more accurate, I would not have the same breadth of strategic freedom.

I mean, don't you doubt any of this information?

What kind of transparacy and credibility does the Abbas government have, when I arrests bloggers for "extending the tongue"?

The whole page on human rights in Palestine is horrible.


Fair. I do approach the wiki with some reservations (I would like to see secondary sources) but at the same time, your post does not mean that those things do not happen. Some of them, at least, I do recall hearing about during the 2006 election. I would be surprised if corruption was not going on, and a heavy authoritarianism streak is sadly very likely as well.
 
One thing I don't get is, why fire the rockets in the first place? They aren't going to hurt a technologically superior nation. All it does is make Israel invade.

Unless...maybe they are doing this to force international intervention.



I'm going to read up on it myself thanks. My guess is it's not going to be quite so simple.

The rockets were fired in response to the mass arrests by Israel of Palestinians after the three Israeli civilians were murdered. None of this happens in a vacuum. Israel was terrified of the unity government that was being formed which was sanctioned by the EU and the US. Netanyahu was looking for any reason to destroy it and the Israeli teenagers provided that, even thought there is no evidence Hamas was involved. The rockets don't help the situation at all but Hamas have put forward reasonable proposals to end the conflict which Israel consistantly rejects. Israel blowing children to bits is not very encouraging for them coming to the negotiating table with REASONABLE proposals.
 
Excuse me but I'm ignorant on the situation, Why hasn't America or any other country tried to step in or even deploy troops seeing as Israel just keeps killing people?
 
Excuse me but I'm ignorant on the situation, Why hasn't America or any other country tried to step in or even deploy troops seeing as Israel just keeps killing people?

The US is not the world police.

Plus they are buddies with Israel, even if they don't support this conflict.
 
Excuse me but I'm ignorant on the situation, Why hasn't America or any other country tried to step in or even deploy troops seeing as Israel just keeps killing people?

America supports Israel in what they are doing due to AIPAC. Most European countries disapprove, but would rather retain America's friendship.
 
That is just more rationalizing. The opposite response would be "I don't condone civilian casualties, but what do you expect Israel to do, weather an unending rain of rockets on their civilian population?" I don't think you would accept that explanation.

Proportionality matters. Leaving aside the fact that fair and reasonable proposals were put forward by the unity government which Israel rejected, The fact is that Hamas rockets do not have the capability to cause the level of destruction that Israel can. One civilian casualty is too much but If Israel wants to try and claim the moral high ground it has to refrain from committing war crimes and be mindful of the damage it does to the Palestinians.
 
Israel said its troops were engaged in combat in the area with Hamas gunmen and it was investigating the incident at the school, Reuters news agency said.

The Israeli military also said that their sensors detected rockets being fired from Gaza that might have fallen short and landed in Beit Hanoun and might have hit the UN school.

shaq-finally-gets-it-shaq-gifs.gif


Theyre blaming Hamas for this smh
 
Well apparently Israel is claiming it's rocket shot from Hamas that misfired.

Right now we have the IDF saying one thing and the Gaza Health Ministry saying another. It is probably prudent we wait to for more information to come out to determine who fired at the UN building.
 
So basically everyone's forced to let this play out or else they cause bigger problems for themselves?

I mean, it's not as though America is threatening European nations per se, but Eurpean nations just don't really care that much. After all, at the end of the day, it doesn't really affect them and if they make action against Israel, they have nothing to gain but will probably lose out economically as trade relations with America sour. What's killing Palestine is the money from pro-Israeli lobbyists and the apathy of the global community.
 
I mean, it's not as though America is threatening European nations per se, but Eurpean nations just don't really care that much. After all, at the end of the day, it doesn't really affect them and if they make action against Israel, they have nothing to gain but will probably lose out economically as trade relations with America sour. What's killing Palestine is the money from pro-Israeli lobbyists and the apathy of the global community.

Good point. If the global community cared, this conflict would have been resolved long ago.
 
Well apparently Israel is claiming it's rocket shot from Hamas that misfired.

Israel also claims every Palestinian civilian casualty is a human shield. I think it's about time we quit believing them.

Ofcourse Israel wouldn't shoot at an UN shelter after the UN started investigating them...

Anyway, pictures started rolling in of the attack.

DE1g6mn.png

ljNPPqr.png

qjS8cCO.png

5Gn6PCm.png
 
Right now we have the IDF saying one thing and the Gaza Health Ministry saying another. It is probably prudent we wait to for more information to come out to determine who fired at the UN building.

A United Nations school converted to house families displaced by weeks of shelling in Gaza was hit by an Israeli airstrike Thursday, killing at least 15 people.

Robert Turner, director of operations in Gaza for the U.N. Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), confirmed the bombing, saying that no warning was given by Israel before the missile hit.

This is not Hamas. This is not IDF.
 
Good point. If the global community cared, this conflict would have been resolved long ago.

The problem isn't a lack of caring outside the conflict but within it, on both sides if that isn't clear. International community has demonstrated caring but other things demand attention too, even if this conflict is the seed for many others.
 
That is a decent point, but I would counter it by saying that the two scales are not remotely equal, and were I in the shoes of Israel I would handle the situation differently. In the situation of Hamas (who allegedly [would really like some more info on this] honored by a two year cease fire and tried to prevent splinter groups from launching missiles), or the palestinians to be more accurate, I would not have the same breadth of strategic freedom.

Proportionality matters. Leaving aside the fact that fair and reasonable proposals were put forward by the unity government which Israel rejected, The fact is that Hamas rockets do not have the capability to cause the level of destruction that Israel can. One civilian casualty is too much but If Israel wants to try and claim the moral high ground it has to refrain from committing war crimes and be mindful of the damage it does to the Palestinians.

The scales are only unequal because Hamas is incapable of inflicting more damage, not that they wouldn't if they could. They're essentially committing war crimes with the sole purpose of provoking war crimes for propaganda purposes to increase their political leverage.

I believe Israel is more morally culpable during peacetime given their "breadth of strategic freedom," but Hamas is currently lowering themselves.

And the list of demands Zen listed on the previous page seem fair and reasonable, but they didn't include the right of return for all refugees. I don't know how many governments would accept that demand in this particular situation.
 
Excuse me but I'm ignorant on the situation, Why hasn't America or any other country tried to step in or even deploy troops seeing as Israel just keeps killing people?

41 or 42 vetos. That's the number of the US has used when it comes to Israel, preventing the UN from doing anything in this situation. Iirc, those are more than half of all the vetos used by the UNSC permanent 5, and each or a majority of those cases, it was only the US vetoing
 
Is there anything WE (i'm in the US) can do about this? Or are the politicians bought and paid for by some pro-Israel lobby?

The religious conservative base in the US support israel.

As long as you have those bible thumpers, you will see massive US support for Israel.
 
I already posted this in the other thread but again, fuck every single cunt who's still agreeing with this shit. I wish you the worst.
 
Good point. If the global community cared, this conflict would have been resolved long ago.

If it was any other country it would have resolved long ago. As long as Israel can play the big brother card and get the US to veto any resolution even moderately critical of it's actions then nothing will be done.

The typical actions by the International community amount to UNSC resolutions. Here's a list of the US vetos pertaining to the conflict.


Condemning Israeli settlements Established Since 1967 as Illegal
S/2011/24 February 18, 2011
Calling Israel To Halt Gaza Operation
S/2006/878 November 11, 2006
Calling Israel To Halt Gaza Operation
S/2006/508 July 13, 2006
Calling Israel To Halt Gaza Operation
S/2004/783 October 5, 2004
Condemning Israel for Killing Hamas Leader Ahmed Yassin
S/2004/240 March 25, 2004
Seeking to Bar Israel from Extending Security Fence
S/2003/980 October 14, 2003
Demanding Israel Halt Threats to Expel Yasser Arafat
S/2003/891 September 16, 2003
Condemning Israeli Killing UN employees of World Food Programme
S/2002/1385 December 20, 2002
Demanding Immediate Cessation of Israeli-Palestinian Violence
S/2001/1199 December 14, 2001
Calling for UN Observers Force in West Bank & Gaza
S/2001/270 March 27, 2001
Demanding Israel Cease Construction of Settlements in East Jerusalem
S/1997/241 March 21, 1997
Calling Israeli authorities to Refrain from All Settlement Activity
S/1997/199 March 7, 1997
Confirming Israeli Expropriation of Land in East Jerusalem as Invalid
S/1995/394 May 17, 1995
Commission to Investigate Murder of Seven Palestinian Workers
S/21326 May 31, 1990
Deploring Israeli Policies and Practices in the Occupied Territories
S/20945/Rev.1 November 7, 1989
Condemning Israeli Policies and Practices in the Occupied Territories
S/20677 June 9, 1989
Deploring Israeli Policies and Practices in the Occupied Territories
S/20463 February 17, 1989
Deploring Israeli Attack Against Lebanese Territory on December 9
S/20322 December 14, 1988
Condemning Invasion by Israeli Forces of Southern Lebanon
S/19868 May 10, 1988
Urging Israel to Abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention
S/19780 April 15, 1988
Calling on Israel to Accept Applicability of 4th Geneva Convention
S/19466 February 1, 1988
Deploring Repeated Israeli Attacks Against Lebanese Territory
S/19434 January 18, 1988
Condemning Israeli Interception of Libyan Plane
S/17796/Rev.1 February 6, 1986
Calling on Israel to Respect Muslim Holy Places
S/17769/Rev.1 January 30, 1986
Condemning Israeli Practices Against Civilians in Southern Lebanon
S/17730/Rev.2 January 17, 1986
Deploring Repressive Measures by Israel Against Arab Population
S/17459 September 13, 1985
Condemning Israeli Actions Against Civilians in Southern Lebanon
S/17000 March 12, 1985
Calls for Israel Respect of Lebanese Sovereignty & Independence
S/16732 September 6, 1984
Determining Israeli Settlement Construction as Illegal
S/15895 August 2, 1983
Condemning Israel for Not Implementing Res.'s 516 & 517
S/15347/Rev.1 August 6, 1982
Demanding Immediate Cessation of Hostilities in Lebanon
S/15255/Rev 2 June 26, 1982
Calling on Israel to Withdraw Forces from Lebanon
S/15185 June 8, 1982
Condemning Aggression on the Temple Mount
S/14985 April 20, 1982
Denouncing Israeli Contravention of Fourth Geneva Convention
S/14943 April 2, 1982
Calling for Nullification of Israeli Occupation of Golan Heights
S/14832/Rev.1 January 20, 1982
Exercise of Inalienable Rights by the Palestinians
S/13911 April 30, 1980
Affirming Palestinian Right of Return and Sovereignty in Palestine
S/12119 June 29, 1976
Calling on Israel to Uphold Protection of Holy Places
S/12022 March 25, 1976
Calling on Israel to Withdraw from All Palestinian Territories
S/11940 January 26, 1976
Condemning Israel for Air Strikes Against Lebanon
S/11898 December 8, 1975
Deploring Israel's Continued Occupation of Palestinian Territories
S/10974 July 26, 1973
Complaint over Israeli Aggression Against Lebanon
S/10784September 10, 1972
 
The religious conservative base in the US support israel.

As long as you have those bible thumpers, you will see massive US support for Israel.

do people like bill maher represent that same religious conservative base?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom