Outside the Jesus pose, I doubt most noticed it.
Come on.
Outside the Jesus pose, I doubt most noticed it.
Come on.
How is that even possible?
Outside the Jesus pose, I doubt most noticed it.
Outside the Jesus pose, I doubt most noticed it.
Read his post again. Tell me what movie is mentioned.Who gives a fuck if you watched Raid 2! That's a martial arts movie. Another genre entirely. Talk about being in the realm of ridiculous fighting.
He's in a church. I doubt most people were going lol Superman is Jesus.Come on.
Now you're just trolling
Never even noticed the Jesus angle in this movie lol. I enjoyed it for what it was, not a huge Superman fan though(I actually dislike him), but the movie was enjoyable
Fucking Jesus is in the background for the whole shot! Are you really gonna sit there and say this is anything less than Snyder jumping out of the screen yelling "Do you get IT?!?"He's in a church. I doubt most people were going lol Superman is Jesus.
I didn't even catch that the first time I saw the movie.
He's in a church. I doubt most people were going lol Superman is Jesus.
I didn't even catch that the first time I saw the movie.
He's in a church. I doubt most people were going lol Superman is Jesus.
I didn't even catch that the first time I saw the movie.
What makes it worse is that the scene is, ultimately, unneccessary. You could lose it completely and there wouldn't be a hiccup in regards to the plot.
My girlfriend actually said "Go, my son, go back to Earth on your Jesus pose!" in this scene.
I know all this. But only those who've dissected the movie could even remember Clark's age to make the connection.Clark also says he is 33 years old, the same age that Jesus was when he was crucified.
I know all this. But only those who've dissected the movie could even remember Clark's age to make the connection.
Not in Man of Steel it didn't. Yeah, it used a lot of CG elements, but everything flowed so damn smooth.And a CGI slugfest doesn't hide anything?
Thanks, I'll take the actors(stuntmen) actually in a scene than the alternative.
It was still worlds beyond the Bourne shake-fests. Come on now.
Winter Soldier wasn't Matrix/Raid level choreography but still better than 99% of other action movies.
![]()
I'd take it over MoS, but that may be personal preference more than anything else.
lol at the unnecessary knife flip. I'm sure you can sell Winter Soldier better than that.
Of course, I never insinuated that the movie had no choreography whatsoever, hence why I used the word extensive. Even then, it is still an assumption on my part.I have my own issues with MoS's action scenes, but agree, they are very different from MoSbecause they're better...mostly because TWS, as a movie, is better and the action does more to drive the rest of the story/characters forward.
The bolded is an assumption, though. There are three components to most action scenes:
Just because you cannot see some of the choreography does not mean there was no choreography. I agree that some films DO use shaky cam/choppy editing to hide a lot of flaws, but choreography is not purely a means of conveying action; it can be a consideration when deciding how a scene is shot and edited. Having a wide angle of the action is not always the best course to take if you are trying to convey a specific feeling or attitude.
- The choreography/performance
- The way it was shot
- The way it was edited
Generally, I really don't like "shaky" cam because it can be a crutch and has been all the rage lately (although it's not a new phenomena)...but I found myself loving TWS's action. TWS happens to have many different types of action scenes. Some are shot shaky, some less so; some are wide, some tight; etc.
There is a very small detail that made me think that TWS knew what it was doing. In the scene after Fury is shot, Cap is chasing the shooter. As he's making his way up to the rooftop, he is running through a hall and leaps to a desk and bounds off of it with the kick of his leg, out of frame. The camera doesn't just shakily follow him--the camera operator actually kind of follows the leg/foot that bounds off the desk.
It is a small detail but added clarity and energy to how Cap was moving. It's "frenetic" done right. The editing complements the camera which complements the choreography which complements the store/scene/mood.
All IMO, of course.
You do realize that the fight scenes in TWS were directly inspired by the ones in The Raid, right?Who gives a fuck if you watched Raid 2! That's a martial arts movie. Another genre entirely. Talk about being in the realm of ridiculous fighting.
And i've been through a lot of these threads, and this is the first time I can remember multiple people bringing it up, even when discussing the Jesus references. It's because it's in the OP.I picked it up on my first watch. It's in the OP.
I've seen it once. Everyone who was half awake during that movie should pick up on it.I know all this. But only those who've dissected the movie could even remember Clark's age to make the connection.
Yeah but Zod was a monsterHated it, it felt more like an alien invasion movie more than a comic book superhero movie (with Superman being a cameo appearance), it reminded me too much of being in the Transformers style...... too much cgi, not enough fleshed out story.
The scripting was cringe-worthy throughout the film, so many dull and corny lines. You can say this about the 78 film............. but that film had heart and soul throughout. Man of Steel just went through the motions trying to find it's identity and never being able to do so.
And as i keep saying in Man of Steel topics, when you care more for the film's villain than you do the good guy/hero of the story then you are doing something wrong as the writer. The best part of the film was Zod saying: Look at this. We could have built a new Krypton in this squalor, but you chose the humans over us. I exist only to protect Krypton. That is the sole purpose for which I was born. And every action I take, no matter how violent, or how cruel, is for the greater good of my people. And now, I have no people. My soul that is what you have taken from me!. That passage was the best part of the film for me. Everything else BIG THUMBS DOWN.
I have no hope for Superman vs Batman and think it's the wrong idea to copy Marvel's blueprint.
[/I]
And i've been through a lot of these threads, and this is the first time I can remember multiple people bringing it up, even when discussing the Jesus references. It's because it's in the OP.
And as i keep saying in Man of Steel topics, when you care more for the film's villain than you do the good guy/hero of the story then you are doing something wrong as the writer. The best part of the film was Zod saying: Look at this. We could have built a new Krypton in this squalor, but you chose the humans over us. I exist only to protect Krypton. That is the sole purpose for which I was born. And every action I take, no matter how violent, or how cruel, is for the greater good of my people. And now, I have no people. My soul that is what you have taken from me!. That passage was the best part of the film for me. Everything else BIG THUMBS DOWN.
And i've been through a lot of these threads, and this is the first time I can remember multiple people bringing it up, even when discussing the Jesus references. It's because it's in the OP.
This is bullshit because most people don't even know The Bible that well.I've seen it once. Everyone who was half awake during that movie should pick up on it.
Are you seriously hinting that we are picking the Jesus reference because the OP mentions it? come on man, it was so goddamn evident!, in fact it surprises me more that someone who claims to love the movie as much as you do, didn't pick the whole Superjesus on your 1st viewing.
Don't project your own ignorance onto others.This is bullshit because most people don't even know The Bible that well.
The very first half of the movie establishes Clark Kent as someone who is trying to find his place in the world, who drifts from place to place trying to find where he fits in.Zod had way more motivation and complexity compared to Supes, and Zod wasn't even that memorable. That's how poor the Superman character is in this.
This is bullshit because most people don't even know The Bible that well.
Of course I picked up on it. It was the church scene that went over my head the first time.
Zod had way more motivation and complexity compared to Supes, and Zod wasn't even that memorable. That's how poor the Superman character is in this.
Yeah but Zod was a monster
and Superman was gonna stop him
When did this even become about me?Don't project your own ignorance onto others.
And if you don't make the connection with the age, there are another million hamfisted "metaphors".
Given it was at least mentioned in every review I read/heard and everyone I know who saw it, talked about it with varying degrees of annoyance, I'd say it was fairly obvious to the average moviegoer, yes.When did this even become about me?
Responding directly to a guy that missed all of it, I said I doubt most people noticed the reference outside the Jesus pose anyway. Do you really think the average moviegoer saw it much differently?
I have no hope for Superman vs Batman and think it's the wrong idea to copy Marvel's blueprint
Critics who are paid to scrutinize movies and the people you know... Hell of a sample size.Given it was at least mentioned in every review I read/heard and everyone I know who saw it, talked about it with varying degrees of annoyance, I'd say it was fairly obvious to the average moviegoer, yes.
The very first half of the movie establishes Clark Kent as someone who is trying to find his place in the world, who drifts from place to place trying to find where he fits in.
So you can go ahead and say that Superman had less motivation than Zod... But that's literally the point of his character arc.
His was one poster in here, so ...Critics who are paid to scrutinize movies and the people you know... Hell of a sample size.
Well, to be annoyed by this as well as claim that MoS didn't understand Superman is pretty ridiculous considering his biblical origins in the first place.Given it was at least mentioned in every review I read/heard and everyone I know who saw it, talked about it with varying degrees of annoyance, I'd say it was fairly obvious to the average moviegoer, yes.
Well, this movie is very polarizing.
Some people really despise it.
Some people (somehow) found illumination on it.
It was still worlds beyond the Bourne shake-fests. Come on now.
Winter Soldier wasn't Matrix/Raid level choreography but still better than 99% of other action movies.
![]()
I'd take it over MoS, but that may be personal preference more than anything else.
I don't hate the movie, but it saddens me to think of the potential of what it could have been with only a mild script rewrite and a few directional changes. This could have potentially been the best Superman movie ever, now it's just ... not.
I always feel like I'm ragging on the film and I probably am. .