There's a difference between incorporating parts of the Superman mythos and actively skewing your movie towards christians.Well, to be annoyed by this as well as claim that MoS didn't understand Superman is pretty ridiculous considering his biblical origins in the first place.
http://www.newsmax.com/Hirsen/Christian-Metaphors-Man-of-Steel-Superman/2013/06/17/id/510265/The executives at Warner Bros. were well aware of the Christian content and evidently strategized accordingly. The studio aggressively marketed Man of Steel to Christian clergy, even retaining a theologian to provide sermon notes for pastors from which they could preach about the film.
The notes have a fitting designation: Jesus: The Original Superhero.
He's in a church. I doubt most people were going lol Superman is Jesus.
I didn't even catch that the first time I saw the movie.
saw this again today because of this thread - i still enjoy parts of it. hope batman v supes turns out better
forgot clark was a kleptomaniac
and i still don't get why zod wanted lois on the ship
"for every human you save we will kill a million more"
superman should've snapped faora's neck
Good thing they're not doing that then, right?
We're gonna have to add "copy Marvel's blueprint" to the hashtag list of meaningless cliche complaints here pretty soon, aren't we.
#bloated #trainwreck #clusterfuck
But why do Kryptonians look like Humans? Has that ever been explained? Convergent evolution? Same seed spread across galaxy? Engineers? The Chase?
Krypton is really just Earth 3000 years in the future. Jor El sent his son back in time.
That drama was more manufactured than your average e3 hype machineDC will probably give the heroes better motive than avengers to band together, or I fucking hope so at least
So lame how the death of meaningless coulson made them decide to take the fight seriously. Who cared about him aside from stark? And even he didn't really seem to like him much in the iron man movies
saw this again today because of this thread - i still enjoy parts of it. hope batman v supes turns out better
forgot clark was a kleptomaniac
and i still don't get why zod wanted lois on the ship
DC will probably give the heroes better motive than avengers to band together, or I fucking hope so at least
So lame how the death of meaningless coulson made them decide to take the fight seriously. Who cared about him aside from stark? And even he didn't really seem to like him much in the iron man movies
DC will probably give the heroes better motive than avengers to band together, or I fucking hope so at least
So lame how the death of meaningless coulson made them decide to take the fight seriously. Who cared about him aside from stark? And even he didn't really seem to like him much in the iron man movies
I think the impending doom of civilization and the fact that they'd just gotten their asses kicked on the Helicarrier were more the reasons they banded together for the final fight than the death of Coulson.
I think the impending doom of civilization and the fact that they'd just gotten their asses kicked on the Helicarrier were more the reasons they banded together for the final fight than the death of Coulson. Coulson was mostly for Stark's sake.
Everyone else had plenty other reasons to head to the final battle. Black Widow and Hawkeye went because they were pissed about what Loki did to Hawkeye. Thor went to stop his brother. Banner went to atone for losing it on the Helicarrier and attacking everyone. Cap went because he's Captain Fucking America.
DC will probably give the heroes better motive than avengers to band together, or I fucking hope so at least
So lame how the death of meaningless coulson made them decide to take the fight seriously. Who cared about him aside from stark? And even he didn't really seem to like him much in the iron man movies
Stopping the end of the world = motive
Coulson's death = motivation
The scout ship in MoS is about 18-20,000 years old, which is almost as old as Earth's humans.I don't think this is true, is it? Krypton's sun is much older than Earth's.
I doubt we're getting to Darkseid first.
Brainiac & Doomsday would likely get picked as JL villains before we start bringing in the New Gods.
lol restraint
This is the easiest one, Zod used her to get information from Kal (he didn't know him). And he did, she had one of those kripto-trips.Biggest complaint is Lois being in places that she has no reason being. Why did Zod take her on his ship
Probably going by the tradition of her being the daughter of a soldier, she also said in the artic that "she gets writer's block if she's not wearing bulletproof vest" which tells that she's a war reporter, probably.Also why did she get to go on the bombing mission?
Clark didn't know Zod's intentions were to destroy earth, in fact, when Zod talked about his plans about rebuilding Krypton, he wasn't bothered at all, it seems that was Jor El's mission too, Clark got pissed off when Zod revealed his intentions to destroy humans. he probably thought humans could decide on sharing their planet.Hell why did Clark decide to turn himself into Zod when he knew he was an evil megalomaniac that tried to stage a coup on heir home world? He says that "he'll let humanity decide," but should he clue humanity on what an insane, murderous bastard he is?
Just re-watched it, went from hatred to, ehh, it's okay. Biggest complaint is Lois being in places that she has no reason being. Why did Zod take her on his ship?
Because she was the only one that knew how the Phantom Portal thingy worked.Also why did she get to go on the bombing mission?
Hell why did Clark decide to turn himself into Zod when he knew he was an evil megalomaniac that tried to stage a coup on heir home world? He says that "he'll let humanity decide," but should he clue humanity on what an insane, murderous bastard he is?
"New Gods? the fuck is that? Unless his name is JESUS FUCKING CHRIST that's a no go. He's a big stone man from space who's evil the audience will LOVE it!"
The New 52 JL's first arc is basically a glorified movie storyboard, no doubt made for the exact purpose of being adapted.
I'm gonna expand on this a little bit.The scout ship in MoS is about 18-20,000 years old, which is almost as old as Earth's humans.I don't think this is true, is it? Krypton's sun is much older than Earth's.
So the answer is ambiguous
That's the basic gist of it yes.I only know about New Gods from Young Justice so my information is probably completely wrong but here we go.
New Gods reside on New Genesis while Darkseid reside on Apokolips, everyone on New Genesis and Apokolips are basically gods and they live outside normal time and space.
I guess you can think of it as Heaven v Hell.
Quick, someone correct me.
So was Birthright and somehow Goyer/Nolan FUCKED THAT PARTICULAR DOG.
So I'm hoping Terrio/Affleck/Snyder (that's right I'm including Affleck in that braintrust) have decided against going with New 52. Although looking at the casting - it's hard to argue that isn't the direction they're probably going.
Siegel adopted certain aspects of biblical characters because they seemed to be a practical way of setting up a hero's story. Kal-El itself can be interpreted as a Hebrew name.Every movie Superman has had heavy Jesus imagery which is stupid because it really adds nothing to the character. MoS was super obvious in the church but Superman Returns took it a step further and turned its third act into a superpowered Passion Play. God I hate that movie.
The weirdest thing MoS did was combine Superman into a Moses/Jesus/Noah's Ark Hybrid with the Codex thing. There had to be a less clumsy way to make Zod want to kill Superman.
Also, WEEEEEEEE
![]()
Good thing they're not doing that then, right?
We're gonna have to add "copy Marvel's blueprint" to the hashtag list of meaningless cliche complaints here pretty soon, aren't we.
#bloated #trainwreck #clusterfuck
Siegel adopted certain aspects of biblical characters because they seemed to be a practical way of setting up a hero's story. Kal-El itself can be interpreted as a Hebrew name.
but yeah, the movies were a bit heavy-handed
I think the whole "DC is ashamed of their comic book origins" is a pretty dubious complaint in general given how many different styles and story types they have to adapt, and I'm especially confused at how you'd call Arrow out for this. Arrow is, like, the most comic booky comic book show since Lois and Clark, and only gets moreso as time passes on.I'm a giant Superman fan, and I thought this movie was dogshit. 75% of it was Cavill looking sad, and the other 25% was Superman indiscriminately blowing up huge chunks of Smallville and Metropolis (probably killing hundreds of people along the way) in giant, boring, overblown CGI fights. The part at the end where the female soldier is like "omg he's so hot" was goddamn embarrassing. Amy Adams was okay and some of the music was great.
All in all it was a pretty bad disaster movie, but an awful Superman movie. I don't know why DC's live action people are so embarrassed of their comic book origins. Arrow's a bland mess with a moody main character in an boring urban cityscape, and between Wonder Woman's monochrome costume and that teaser of Superman and Batman looking at each other with glowy angry eyes in the middle of a thunderstorm, the new Batman V.S Superman movie isn't shaping up to be much better. It's almost like DC is afraid to put color or humor into their movies (you know, comic book things) in case people think that they're nerds and beat them up. I understand that they want to differentiate themselves from what Marvel is doing with their (much more successful and enjoyable) movies, but I don't think turning every movie into a dull "mature" shitpile is a good solution.
Darkseid for Justice League is a given IMO as it will give them a chance at pre-empting Thanos in Avengers 3, unless Marvel decides to rush that movie out to compete.
They might not be doing the exact same thing but i still roll my eyes that because Marvel had some success, DC now want a slice of the action (granted they were the originators of comic book super hero movies). .
Also, WEEEEEEEE
![]()
Darkseid for Justice League is a given IMO as it will give them a chance at pre-empting Thanos in Avengers 3, unless Marvel decides to rush that movie out to compete.
The combined power of the Justice league kind of annihilates the Avengers (provided we do get Flash and GL), so I think introducing someone like Darkseid right off the bat will right then and there establish why a team is needed. Maybe they wont need to have him as a direct opponent, but id expect to see him be way more visible than Thanos in Avengers 1 was.I'm not terribly optimistic about Darkseid or Thanos. In order to do movies that would do either of their stories any justice, the cost would have to be so astronomical and so complicated from a production and post-production standpoint that I wouldn't be stunned if those movies signalled a big comic book movie crash(which in turn could cause each studio to crash). Besides I think JLA and Avengers' best stories have nothing to do with those villains but that's just me