• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Ferguson: Police Kill 18yo Black Male; Fire Gas/Rubber Bullets Into Protesting Crowds

Status
Not open for further replies.
Weird initial altercation at the store. It looked like he tried to pay. Kinda wonder if the cashier just asked for ID and he didn't have it on him and got irritated. I've had that happen to me before and felt like just walking out.

Just seems like a weird plan to steal something in that manner and then just slowly walk home. I dunno.

Regardless, the kid didn't deserve to be gunned down for trying to flee.

Yea it looks like he was refused service due to some reason and walked out with it to prove a point. Will be interesting to see if details come out that he tried to pay for the rillos.

I wonder what the smear campaign would look like then.
 
And police often release those robbery videos to local news outlets when these things happen. It's a staple of television news. I have to question the timing of releasing the tape.

The robbery video is completely unrelated to the shooting, and the police have admitted as much.

The timing is only part of the problem.
 
I had this reply ready to go in the abortion of a thread discussing Michael Brown's alleged theft/robbery of a convenience store prior to his death. But I thought of an angle that I haven't seen posted before, though, admittedly I haven't been able to keep up with this thread today:

I see intimidation and some physical force in that video. A judge would eat that up in a second as robbery.
Unless Missouri courts have interpreted robbery differently than most jurisdictions, that's not robbery in the video with two possible exceptions: (1) the clerk was holding the cigarillos and Brown grabbed them from him or (2) Brown threatened the clerk with the immediate use of a dangerous instrument (possible, I suppose, because we don't have sound).

Here's MO's basic robbery statute:
Robbery in the second degree.
569.030. 1. A person commits the crime of robbery in the second degree when he forcibly steals property.

2. Robbery in the second degree is a class B felony.
The force requirement in robbery doesn't mean that you have to push or assault the victim. It only means you have to exert enough force to overcome the actual resistance being exerted by the victim over the property in order to take it from their possession. A clear example is purse snatching: if the purse snatcher takes the purse off a woman's shoulder, it's robbery. If, however, the woman places or drops the purse on the ground and the purse snatcher grabs it, it's larceny because he didn't have to overcome the physical resistance of the victim. Does that make sense?

From looking at the video, I see larceny and assault, but not robbery. Both larceny and this level of assault are misdemeanors.

And it a bit of "fantastic" news, if Ferguson decides to classify it somehow as a robbery, it could potentially put felony murder on the table for the closest eye witness to Brown's death (assuming that he is the other guy in the video with Brown):
Second degree murder, penalty.
565.021. 1. A person commits the crime of murder in the second degree if he:

(2) Commits or attempts to commit any felony, and, in the perpetration or the attempted perpetration of such felony or in the flight from the perpetration or attempted perpetration of such felony, another person is killed as a result of the perpetration or attempted perpetration of such felony or immediate flight from the perpetration of such felony or attempted perpetration of such felony.
Has this possibility been brought up yet?
 
Uh well.. not sure how to feel about this. That video certainly paints him in a negative light. Not to say the cop was justified in shooting him but if he was willing to bully the shop owners/workers like that perhaps he did try something stupid against the cop? Ugh. Man this whole thing is depressing.
 
local reporter's twitter

he also added he was blocking traffic -- and I thought during one of his lie sessions -- he said the officer was responding to a sic? and that Brown was in the way...

Uh well.. not sure how to feel about this. That video certainly paints him in a negative light. Not to say the cop was justified in shooting him but if he was willing to bully the shop owners/workers like that perhaps he did try something stupid against the cop? Ugh. Man this whole thing is depressing.

Theres that narrative working, why resist it. Yes, a young man stealing cigars is definitely going to attack a police officer in ferguson, where the police are known to beat blacks for absolutely nothing, and charge them with getting blood on uniforms. Yes, this was the plan. That he was going to attack an officer without a gun, and try to steal that officers gun to kill him. This is the most plausible scenario, so why bother second guessing yourself. He had a death wish, if that shove and the hope of enjoying some shitty cigars is all we have to go on. He is definitely capable of attacking/stealing an officers gun, shooting him, and getting away with it. Yep.
 
And police often release those robbery videos to local news outlets when these things happen. It's a staple of television news. I have to question the timing of releasing the tape.

It was a response to a FOIA request, if I understand correctly, which have to be responded to in a certain number of days. I would guess someone put in the request for either incidents occurring that day (since early we heard something of a robbery) or a request for any investigations with Brown's name included. Since the investigation into the robbery was closed (due to the death of the subject), I don't think there would be a valid reason to deny the foia request. Now, you could probably delay it getting the AG to issue an opinion, maybe. I am not terribly familiar with MO's sunshine laws.

So, it had the effect of smearing the deceased, but was it intentional by the police? That may be giving that department too much credit.
 
WAT

https://twitter.com/ShaunKing/status/500359527305592832

"Police Chief JUST CONFIRMED that the shooting officer, Darren Wilson DID NOT write his own incident report. INSANITY."

You know, I was ready to give this guy some credit for revealing this robbery thing days later, rather than rushing it out ASAP to smear the kid. Releasing that info with the officers name would (to me) have shown they might actually be doing a real investigation.

Now they reveal that this was totally unrelated, there was no reason to release this at this time except to try and cast doubt on Brown.
 
Uh well.. not sure how to feel about this. That video certainly paints him in a negative light. Not to say the cop was justified in shooting him but if he was willing to bully the shop owners/workers like that perhaps he did try something stupid against the cop? Ugh. Man this whole thing is depressing.

You're doing exactly what they want you to do.
 
Intriguing - you don't understand why that happened there. You parade your ignorance around as if it makes you better than everyone else. You make assumptions against the black people in these cases without ever really knowing what's happening.

That you're so blatant is refreshing, though. Tell me - what's your endgame here?
See the previous page, he is a troll.
 
I dunno, that little guy (gal?) looked awfully scared to me.

Officer didn't know about the robbery though, so the only reason to bring it up in the context of the shooting is character assassination.

Yep. If the video had come out directly after the incident it could change things, but releasing it now seems like just that. Character Assassination.
 
Even if that is all true WHY does he need to shoot so many times? I'm looking forward to your justification of this.

This comes up in every one of these incidents, but it is because honestly, police are very poorly trained in the use of firearms if they aren't a member of the SWAT team.. It basically amounts to 'if you have to use your gun, keep shooting until you run out'. It's an overly legalistic idea that stems from the thought that lethal force is lethal force, so if it is justified you may as well make sure the guy is dead.

It'd be nice to see this training model be discontinued, most civilian CCW training is better than the basic training patrol officers receive.

Also to be fair, you can unload a semi auto handgun pretty damn quick under the effects of adrenaline.

I haven't really come to a conclusion on this particular case, but it's clear that we could be doing a lot of things better with policing. Starting with cameras everywhere.
 
My expectation is just recognition that some people may in fact question, disagree with or be skeptical of the prevailing viewpoint of a particular facet of this story and that that isn't necessarily motivated by secret racism, a desire, conscious or otherwise, to downplay tragedy or a need to be contrarian. Maybe he perceives the use of child or an emphasis on his innocence as needless emotional ploys. I don't know that I agree, but I can sympathize with that in a way, since his age and criminal history have no bearing on whether or not this killing was justified. That's maybe even a discussion worth having, but it won't be brought up if we just attack our own assumptions.

To me, this practice of focusing on motivations without any attempt to understand first breeds an attitude whereby anyone going even slightly against the grain finds themselves the target of barely veiled accusations regarding racism, pro-police defense force and so on and so forth. I don't think it's in the best interest of civil discussions of emotional topics.

I like you.

I wish threads like this were more about trying to figure out what happened, rather than just being angry at people. I wish people in general felt more uncomfortable with certainty. If you feel like you have a solid picture of what happened in Ferguson, that should make you uncomfortable and you should question whether you might be wrong. ESPECIALLY if it is making you emotional.
 
just stop guys, he'll get himself banned here shortly.

Sounds like a personal integrity issue to me. He could have deadlocked it.
nice, banned right after i called him being banned. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Every policeman is supposed to write an incident report after it happens detailing everything that was witnessed at the crime scene/incident all as a part of procedure. He, for whatever reason, chose to go against procedure in this case

this is pretty huge is it not?
 
The stills make it seem a hell of a lot worse than it was.

iJ3sBCmkTqEWP.gif

Seriously? You think the stills are worse than this? This looks way worse. Not that it has anything to do with the shooting but c'mon. That shit is terrible.
 
If he tried to pay for it but was refused service, wouldn't his friend have said so?

I'm not saying such is not the case, I'm just wondering that if it was, why hasn't that been brought up?
 
Uh well.. not sure how to feel about this. That video certainly paints him in a negative light. Not to say the cop was justified in shooting him but if he was willing to bully the shop owners/workers like that perhaps he did try something stupid against the cop? Ugh. Man this whole thing is depressing.

The only thing we know as far as the cops injuries is that he had some swelling on his face.

The shot him in the back as he was running away.

An altercation can't justify that.
 
I think the news of him performing a robbery is a cop out of a cop shooting an unarmed dude in cold blood on the street in order to justify his actions to the masses. I dont agree with the police or the rioters
 
For anyone who watched the press conference, did the revelation about the robbery having nothing to do with this incident come freely from the Police Chief, or was it an answer when someone asked?

Feel this could answer clearly as to incompetence or cover up.

Ok. I didn't know they gave out status yet.

Paid leave I think is standard across the country in officer involved shootings. Even in cases where there is absolutely no doubt as to the justification of the shooting, there is always an investigation.
 
I'm confused. Besides the victim, are the only witnesses of the shooting Dorian Johnson and Darren Wilson? No video, etc?

Is it confirmed that a shot did go off inside the police car?
 
Yea it looks like he was refused service due to some reason and walked out with it to prove a point. Will be interesting to see if details come out that he tried to pay for the rillos.

I wonder what the smear campaign would look like then.

In the police report:

YTU0U1m.png
 
but but but the cop didn't know about the convenience store incident
Pretty sick that they're using this as emotional ammo, even though it had nothing to do with the death. But hey, anything that makes these guys sleep better at night.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom