The Great Gonzales
Member
I'm still waiting for a good reason for why the leaker would take a whole ream of snapshots rather than just one video. I have this objection to nearly every "leak" these days: in a world where it's almost impossible to find a cell phone or digital camera that doesn't take video, why on earth would you choose to take a bunch of still shots? It's less efficient and is far less convincing than a video would be. So unless these leakers can give a reasonable explanation for why they took pics instead of a video, then we should follow the time-honored principle of inference to the best explanation: snapshots are easier to doctor than videos, which in turn suggests the leak is fake.
So without even looking very hard at the content of this specific leak, we already have a decent a priori reason to doubt it.
So without even looking very hard at the content of this specific leak, we already have a decent a priori reason to doubt it.