Okay, your first post is just "she posted pics of harassment that were forwarded to her but then talked about a raid which means she blamed all of the users on this one site," which doesn't make any sense at all because she never did that.
Of course she is not literally blaming every single person on Wizard chan, she is blaming a threshold majority by which she can refer to them collectively as acting out as a general representation of "Wizard chan" and it's intent, which is insane especially because the screenshots she linked in no way indicate a plan to actively harass her.
If you go through the tweets, she directly attribute the 'raid' to Wizard chan.
"Shoutout to the person who warned me about Wizard Chan going after me because otherwise i would have been more freaked out by the phone calls" - Dec 14th
She first mentions 'The Raid' on Dec 12th
And like I said, contrary to your post, none of the posts she linked showed that Wizard chan was "considering going after her".
So, again you are wrong that Wizard chan was discussing harassing her and you are wrong to say that she was blaming all the people on the site as a defense of her blaming the effective active majority.
Your second point is that Zoe Quinn ruined a game jam by criticizing on Twitter (regardless of whether you disagree with her stance), as even your screencap does not elaborate on what she did outside of vague accusations that make no sense for Zoe to do and I have no idea how she would have the power to do these things. Also, when someone contacted her about it recently, she just responded with "I'm standing by my criticism of their trans policy" which strongly indicates that she has no idea about any "shutting down" or "ruining." If journalists didn't cover that project, that's not Zoe's fault.
Or she does not want to talk about them. Again you did not answer my question. Why would they lie? Most specifically in a way that would be so easy to disprove, and if they were lying why would she not set the record straight. Are you really entertaining the notion that she would not have been made aware of the allegations when it was being linked on other sites and through reddit. Besides he is no explicitly alleging that she
personally got them doxxed and banned from twitter, but starting the twitter storm would be what led to these events regardless of her personal actions in the matter.
And with that, your defense of insane conspiracy theories is over. This topic is done.
No. You are actively allowing the "media cabal conspiracy" allegations to color your perception. I don't believe in it because it is stupid, but that is beside the point.