Oh SHIT, there's video? The family and lawyer saw it? DeWine handed it over to a special prosecutor?
Charges are coming then. That's about as open and shut as it gets. Ignore the part about the cop being allowed back to duty, AGs don't control that. If they're taking it to a grand jury and he's specially assigning people, he wants blood.
At bare minimum, they're in some deep fucking trouble now.
Police claim Crawford ignored their commands to drop the weapon, and the former Marine who called in the report and witnessed the shooting said Crawford “looked like he was going to go violently.”
But attorney Michael Wright said surveillance video from the incident, which Ohio’s attorney general allowed him to watch with Crawford’s family, contradicted those accounts.
“John was doing nothing wrong in Walmart, nothing more, nothing less than shopping,” Wright said.
The attorney said surveillance video showed Crawford facing away from officers, talking on the phone, and leaning on the pellet gun like a cane when he was “shot on sight” in a “militaristic” response by police.
So why were the police called if he was just shopping?
So why were the police called if he was just shopping?
John was doing nothing wrong in Walmart, nothing more, nothing less than shopping, Wright said.
Interview with the guy who called the police, smug shit eating grin and all:
http://www.whio.com/videos/news/man-who-called-911-in-walmart-shooting-talks-to/vCmptw/
Interview with the guy who called the police, smug shit eating grin and all:
http://www.whio.com/videos/news/man-who-called-911-in-walmart-shooting-talks-to/vCmptw/
Not a single drop of remorse in his rotund body. Boils my blood.
At least the guy's girlfriend and parents will get some form of retribution. I was wondering why it took so long for video evidence to surface, and now bringing it to the AG makes more sense why.
How do you charge this as AG? Involuntary Manslaughter?
The article doesn't really say much beyond the exact moment he was shot except for:
I'd like to hear a description of how he was handling the gun the moments before to see if those two "witnesses" did in fact get this guy SWATted.
Thread bump
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/08/...e-leaned-on-toy-gun-in-walmart-attorney-says/
Surveillance video shows an Ohio man talking on a cell phone, leaning on a toy gun, and facing away from officers moments before police shot and killed him in a Walmart store, according to an attorney for the mans family.
A 37-year-old woman at the store suffered an unspecified medical emergency after the shooting and died a short time later.
The article doesn't really say much beyond the exact moment he was shot except for:
I'd like to hear a description of how he was handling the gun the moments before to see if those two "witnesses" did in fact get this guy SWATted.
Interview with the guy who called the police, smug shit eating grin and all:
http://www.whio.com/videos/news/man-who-called-911-in-walmart-shooting-talks-to/vCmptw/
This shit needs to be federally mandated. You on active duty, you wear a camera. I can understand undercover cops, but short of that your fucking ass is wired up.until we get cameras on all cops this shit will continue to happen...
This asshole should be charged with something.
It's described above. He wasn't facing the officers, and he was leaning on it like a cane. Not raised to attack, not brandishing it people, not pointing it in the air, not playing war games.
Even if he had actually robbed the place 10 minutes beforehand, it would STILL be murder. You don't get to execute people just because you fear them mentally, there has to be a real threat.
It's described above. He wasn't facing the officers, and he was leaning on it like a cane. Not raised to attack, not brandishing it people, not pointing it in the air, not playing war games.
Even if he had actually robbed the place 10 minutes beforehand, it would STILL be murder. You don't get to execute people just because you fear them mentally, there has to be a real threat.
I'm not arguing that. I want to know how he was behaving to determine if the 911 callers were lying to escalate the situation intentionally.
I'm not arguing that. I want to know how he was behaving to determine if the 911 callers were lying to escalate the situation intentionally.
The guy is on video above saying the dude swung around to point the "gun" at the officers. He also says when he was bleeding on the ground, he tried to lunge again for the officers and/or the gun.
He's completely delusional.
Well if he was really just standing there leaning on the gun and talking on his phone, then you know the callers are already lieing. The callers said he was swung around and pointed the guns at the cop, which is a lie if the video description is true..
Edit: I don't think any criminal charges will be filed against him. Being a bad eyewitness isn't a crime. He's an asshole and a liar, but the officers ultimately had the responsibility to assess the situation with level heads.
I do have a question for those versed in law/the justice system. How would releasing the video to the public help the defense or provide them with loopholes?
until we get cameras on all cops this shit will continue to happen...
Well if he was really just standing there leaning on the gun and talking on his phone, then you know the callers are already lieing. The callers said he was swung around and pointed the guns at the cop, which is a lie if the video description is true..
Unfortunately we're just going off of someone else's account of the video and it was given at most a sentence.
Oh SHIT, there's video? The family and lawyer saw it? DeWine handed it over to a special prosecutor?
Charges are coming then. That's about as open and shut as it gets. Ignore the part about the cop being allowed back to duty, AGs don't control that. If they're taking it to a grand jury and he's specially assigning people, he wants blood.
Filing a false police report/SWATting is, though.
So who's going to jail over this fuck up?
Filing a false police report/SWATting is, though.
It gives the defense a question to ask during jury selection - 'have you seen the video'? Yes? Automatic grounds for disqualification, in their opinion. Trial by media.
of course theres freaking video, it happened IN walmart.
this is sickening, I hope the people responsible are held responsible but i have little hope.
It's not a false report to call in the presence of what looks like a gun.
Got it. So basically anyone who's seen it would be considered biased.
Infuriating. Glad they weren't smart enough to try to destroy the video.
Wow. I need to type this out because it's so cartoonishly fucked up I'm having trouble even processing it. Dude was on the phone leaning on the toy gun with his back turned and the next thing he knows he's shot. He didn't even see it coming. And all of this is on surveillance video. There should be no way this isn't an open and shut case.
I do have a question for those versed in law/the justice system. How would releasing the video to the public help the defense or provide them with loopholes?
The guy is on video above saying the dude swung around to point the "gun" at the officers. He also says when he was bleeding on the ground, he tried to lunge again for the officers and/or the gun.
He's completely delusional.
Edit: I don't think any criminal charges will be filed against him. Being a bad eyewitness isn't a crime. He's an asshole and a liar, but the officers ultimately had the responsibility to assess the situation with level heads.
Why would Walmart do that?
Pretty much this.
I don't expect anything to happen to the couple.
Looking at the video of the witness leads the viewer to believe that the kid was intimidating people all over the place. Logic dictates that if this was the case, though, wouldn't any other customer call the police or warned a WALMART employee of suspicious activity? Wouldn't there be several fearful calls?
Not even a single Walmart employee from either the toy section or the gaming section has come forward to validate that shopper's claims.
It didn't happen the way that he said it did. He even claims that after being shot, the guy went BACK FOR THE GUN.
Wasn't expecting the witness to be as young as he was. Personal speculation: he had issues with people of color.
Is that T-shirt he is wearing from any particular band? Or is it some generic iron cross & skulls T-shirt?Interview with the guy who called the police, smug shit eating grin and all:
http://www.whio.com/videos/news/man-who-called-911-in-walmart-shooting-talks-to/vCmptw/
The guy is on video above saying the dude swung around to point the "gun" at the officers. He also says when he was bleeding on the ground, he tried to lunge again for the officers and/or the gun.
He's completely delusional.
Edit: I don't think any criminal charges will be filed against him. Being a bad eyewitness isn't a crime. He's an asshole and a liar, but the officers ultimately had the responsibility to assess the situation with level heads.
It's not a false report to call in the presence of what looks like a gun.
After my coworker spotted someone in the neighborhood just standing around with a rifle, the sergeant whose office is next to ours told us to always call the cops when we see someone with a gun. They don't consider it a waste of time to make sure everything is on the up and up.
They didn't just report the presence of what looks like a gun. They reported a man aiming the gun at people and children, looking menacing like he was about to cause mayhem.
This.
http://www.whio.com/videos/news/john-crawfords-family-wants-surveillance-video/vCppzz/
Different vid. Interview with lawyers and family.
Apparently, the kid didn't take the gun out of the package. It was already out of the packaging. Also, the witness claims that the boy was trying to load the gun.
Which is why the video before the call is needed if anything is to come up against the couple.