Has anybody else tried 3D on this thing? It's amazing at 1440p, doesn't look at all low res like it did on the 1080p display I tried. I've already got the Trine series, anything else worth trying in 3D?
I assume you were using your previous 120hz monitor with vsync on, right? And the revelation is from the lack of input lag? Otherwise I don't understand how G-Sync could make a significant visual difference, particularly in terms of screen tear. If one owns a 120/144hz monitor I would imagine one would want to prioritize configuring their games in such a way that they'd average a framerate high enough to put their refresh rate to use. From personal experience and what I've heard from friends screen tearing just isn't noticeable until the framerate tanks below ~60.
I understand the benefit of GSync at 1440p, even the strongest of PCs will struggle to maintain a constant ~8.3ms render time, but at 1080p Gsync seems to me like a gimmick with little benefit unless one deliberately cranks GFX settings to the max and tanks their fps in the process. But, again, why would one do that if they have a 144hz monitor? What am I missing here?
I assume you were using your previous 120hz monitor with vsync on, right? And the revelation is from the lack of input lag? Otherwise I don't understand how G-Sync could make a significant visual difference, particularly in terms of screen tear. If one owns a 120/144hz monitor I would imagine one would want to prioritize configuring their games in such a way that they'd average a framerate high enough to put their refresh rate to use. From personal experience and what I've heard from friends screen tearing just isn't noticeable until the framerate tanks below ~60.
I understand the benefit of GSync at 1440p, even the strongest of PCs will struggle to maintain a constant ~8.3ms render time, but at 1080p Gsync seems to me like a gimmick with little benefit unless one deliberately cranks GFX settings to the max and tanks their fps in the process. But, again, why would one do that if they have a 144hz monitor? What am I missing here?
Was this actual Amazon stock or still that DEC Trader lie?
"Ships from and sold by DEC Trader."
Was this actual Amazon stock or still that DEC Trader lie?
I assume you were using your previous 120hz monitor with vsync on, right? And the revelation is from the lack of input lag? Otherwise I don't understand how G-Sync could make a significant visual difference, particularly in terms of screen tear. If one owns a 120/144hz monitor I would imagine one would want to prioritize configuring their games in such a way that they'd average a framerate high enough to put their refresh rate to use. From personal experience and what I've heard from friends screen tearing just isn't noticeable until the framerate tanks below ~60.
I understand the benefit of GSync at 1440p, even the strongest of PCs will struggle to maintain a constant ~8.3ms render time, but at 1080p Gsync seems to me like a gimmick with little benefit unless one deliberately cranks GFX settings to the max and tanks their fps in the process. But, again, why would one do that if they have a 144hz monitor? What am I missing here?
-GSync flickering when FPS falls under 30 (such as a loading screens or hitches when something large loads in a game) is very distracting and annoying. DO NOT get this monitor if you cannot maintain more than 30 fps.
I've had mine for about a week now, and everyone's thoughts above pretty much summarize mine as well, it's an amazing gaming monitor.
It's not perfect though, so I'll note my frustrations with the monitor
-Very aggressive matte coating, the shining graininess is readily apparent on brighter colors. If a glossy model ever comes out, I will be selling mine in a heartbeat if I can get a glossy one.
-GSync flickering when FPS falls under 30 (such as a loading screens or hitches when something large loads in a game) is very distracting and annoying. DO NOT get this monitor if you cannot maintain more than 30 fps.
-The monitor's light never seems to change color for me, despite switching modes. Oh well, I'm ok with the permanent red
-On an all black screen, there's quite a bit of backlight bleed
-TN viewing angles, but I knew what I was signing up for
-USB ports are hilariously inaccessible
Playing Devil May Cry 4 using 2560x1440@144Hz is amazing.
-The monitor's light never seems to change color for me, despite switching modes. Oh well, I'm ok with the permanent red
Yes, there's way too much grain on the screen, it makes browsing light pages like Neogaf a real pain. I never had that issue with my previous screens. It really bothers me a lot.-Very aggressive matte coating
Why would you buy an $800 monitor which is primarily designed for playing games at high framerates if your PC can't even run games above 30fps?
Maybe because I used my Dell U3011 as my main for a long time, but the matte doesn't bother me.
Yes, there's way too much grain on the screen, it makes browsing light pages like Neogaf a real pain. I never had that issue with my previous screens. It really bothers me a lot.
As excited as I am for a G-Sync monitor to finally hit the market I always feel like you're giving up one thing to get another. No one monitor seems to have everything. For instance, I've become accustomed to my 21:9 aspect ratio monitor but the contrast ratio is crap plus it's capped at 60Hz. I'd love to have a 34" curved 4K gaming monitor with a 21:9 aspect ratio, the black levels and contrast ratio of an OLED, refresh rate of 144Hz with either G-Sync or whatever similar technology becomes standard. I realize this is a pipe dream but I can dream.
So, what's it like when there's frame rate fluctuations with G-Sync on? Is it more or less noticeable with G-Sync compared to normal 60hz models?
Frame Rate fluctuations is the one thing in gaming that gives me motion sickness, so I was kinda hoping maybe this monitor would help with that.
So, what's it like when there's frame rate fluctuations with G-Sync on? Is it more or less noticeable with G-Sync compared to normal 60hz models?
Frame Rate fluctuations is the one thing in gaming that gives me motion sickness, so I was kinda hoping maybe this monitor would help with that.
Is a single Titan good enough for to take full advantage of this monitor? or do i need to upgrade to better a videocard if getting this monitor?
G-sync supports Surround now?
Yes. Need 3 GPUs and he said a driver should be dropping in a month with official support.
HMMMM.
I'm now tempted to do a multimonitor 144hz G-sync setup.
Is a single Titan good enough for to take full advantage of this monitor? or do i need to upgrade to better a videocard if getting this monitor?
You wouldn't but, it's not primarily designed for that. A lot of stuff written up on Gsync talks about its benefits in the 40 to 60 fps range.
I just wish tiger direct would get them back in stock and ship the one I have on back order
3D, ULMB, Gsync, 1440p, 144 hz, all selling points for me.
So I mentioned earlier that I grabbed this monitor a bit early with plans on upgrading my GPU really soon, so I'm currently running it with a measly 580 and can't take advantage of G-sync. Does anybody have any thoughts on why I can only run it at 85hz right now, though? I mean, it's gotta be some limitation with my 580, right?
If you're fine with toning some settings down, yeah. Titans are strong but at 1440p and 120fps something's gotta give. That said, slap another one of those bad bitches in and things will really start to fly.
the problem is that i cant get a Titan(not black or Z) anywhere no more. so in other words, getting this monitor would be pointless for me then?
don't suppose 0.4.2 oculus runtime fixed the gsync conflict did it? or are we still waiting for new nvidia drivers? still the only thing stopping me from clicking buy
the problem is that i cant get a Titan(not black or Z) anywhere no more. so in other words, getting this monitor would be pointless for me then?
Is it true that screens like this can't make use of 144hz and v-sync? If so why?
Why would it be pointless? It's perfectly well suited. Can you run games at WQHD at 30+fps?
Is a single Titan good enough for to take full advantage of this monitor? or do i need to upgrade to better a videocard if getting this monitor?
I will post the same as others to stress the point because it is frustrating to see the "you need to run at 120 fps" for this monitor. I have a single 780ti and run many graphic intensive games on this monitor at 40-90 fps. G-sync has made the experience with these games absolutely amazing.
In fact this monitor will actually be better in some ways for folks with a single card. Not sure what else to say that hasn't already been added.
AMD users with Swift have similar problems.
I think there needs to be some clarification on the strengths of this monitor. Yes, running games at 120 FPS is amazeballs, but one of the primary advantages to gsync is how well it handles inevitable fluctuations in frame rate, which it does very smoothly and seamlessly, and without input lag. I wouldn't say running games over 120 FPS is the biggest draw at all as we've already had monitors that can do that. The real amazing thing is how smooth it handles the variations, because with vsync you'd still get stuttering even maintaining, say, a range of 70-100 FPS, and you'd still have input lag.