Assassin's Creed "Parity": Unity is 900p/30fps on both PS4 & Xbox One

Status
Not open for further replies.
Funny third-parties didn't have a problem with making the 360 version of their game the better performing/looking one back when the PS3 was the harder system to develop for.

And, despite far more effort going into PS2 versions of multiplats the Xbox versions were almost always better. Power matters.
But it was ok because we didn't have DF telling us about it in detail, most people didn't have progressive scan TVs and most people can't the difference between frame rates to save their lives.
 
Funny third-parties didn't have a problem with making the 360 version of their game the better performing/looking one back when the PS3 was the harder system to develop for.

It's Hindle. He just got to the thread so he will still have 8 more hours of ceaseless damage control until he can get home.
 
Funny third-parties didn't have a problem with making the 360 version of their game the better performing/looking one back when the PS3 was the harder system to develop for.

The PS3 was a complete pain in the arse though, whilst the X1 is just graphically inferior isn't it? For business reasons, I expect both the PS4 and X1 to look very similar in terms of graphics and performance.
 
No it wouldn't.

Everyone here saying oh, let the xbone get the inferior version, let the superior hardware have the better version, stop gimping your games because of an inferior console.

GAF was filled with outrage when the PS3 version of skyrim was widely inferior to the 360 one.

Are Xbone owners outraged by this parity?

No, you are wrong. GAF was filled with outrage when the PS3 version of Skyrim RAN AT ZERO FUCKING FPS.
 
Sorry if this is covered, but was there any truth to this CPU PS4 weakness thing being thrown around?

No. Multiple benchmarks and one of Gaf's own resident insiders/developers already confirmed that the PS4 has more CPU power available to games. But what exactly that means is unknown as far as I know. We don't know if that means there's an extra core available to devs on PS4 or if the clock speed is higher.
 
With nearly double the pixel fill there's no reason the PS4 version can't run at 1080p. Hell they could even devote 384 ALUs to general purpose compute if they cared enough.
 
It's Hindle. He just got to the thread so he will still have 8 more hours of ceaseless damage control until he can get home.

I've no real interest in graphics or performance either way. But Ubisoft are a business, it's in their interest to treat both consoles equally.

That being said, I wouldn't be suprised if this is part of a marketing deal between MS and Ubi.
 
Is Carn82 a vetted insider since he was saying he heard this was an MS moneyhat? I can't keep up with the list of "approved" insider posters.

In any case, that Ubisoft statement is a laughable piece of PR BS if I've ever read one.
 
No, you are wrong. GAF was filled with outrage when the PS3 version of Skyrim RAN AT ZERO FUCKING FPS.

Or 1fp5s, however you want to look at it. Sort of like when vehicles get less than one mile per gallon.
 
lol, somebody even made a French version.
BzSBeJVIgAAVN0n.png:large
 
No it wouldn't.

Everyone here saying oh, let the xbone get the inferior version, let the superior hardware have the better version, stop gimping your games because of an inferior console.

GAF was filled with outrage when the PS3 version of skyrim was widely inferior to the 360 one.

Are Xbone owners outraged by this parity?

I meant to say that if the Xbox One had more powerful specs than PS4, XB1 owners would be just as outraged if their version of the game was intentionally gimped.
 
I wonder....

Sony, as a publisher, actually has a lot of pull in this.

They could play hardball, and if they feel Ubisoft is lying could threaten to pull the game.
 
So?

Are consumers a charity basket to you? Forced parity and yet you want to reward that bullshit?

I'm rewarding a team for making a game that will be fun. That's all I give a shit about really. I'd be more pissed if ACU wasn't fun, than what fuckin resolution it runs at.

And I'll be getting it for PS4 for the record.
 
They've backed themselves into a corner with this idiotic quote. Even if a 1080p patch is possible after launch, releasing it would just confirm that they are full of shit and were throwing dust in our faces and it would make them look even worse.
 
I wonder....

Sony, as a publisher, actually has a lot of pull in this.

They could play hardball, and if they feel Ubisoft is lying could threaten to pull the game.

I said earlier that it is a shame developers should ever be pressured, but that Sony would be foolish to bring a knife to a gunfight.

They should start pressuring publishers to take full advantage of the Ps4's large power differences over Xbox One.
 
No, you are wrong. GAF was filled with outrage when the PS3 version of Skyrim RAN AT ZERO FUCKING FPS.

Yeah, I was outraged to when I bought a game for the same price, the same name, and was inferior to another console that was more expensive than the competition.

This whole, oh fuck the xbone market is ridiculous. Theybought a "next-gen" console as well, they paid 100 extra for a god damn kinect, and fuck em because "they bought the inferior one?"

Honestly, I want to know. Are there any xbone owner actually outraged by this news?

Also, I need to ask. Did people really, really think unity was going to be 1080p 60FPS?

Really?

Have you people actually looked at the footage released today instead of complaining about P and FPS? The game is fucking chugging in the ubisoft produced B-roll.Every demo is filled with screen tearing and popin.

This game has WAY more technical problems than 900p and 30FPS.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom