QuantumZebra
Member
Using a derogatory insult rooted in bags of children without fathers.
Tsk tsk
How political incorrect of you.
ugh.... have an lol
Using a derogatory insult rooted in bags of children without fathers.
Tsk tsk
How political incorrect of you.
"We decided to lock them at the same specs to avoid all the debates and stuff,"
Butthurt.
Bad framerates, better lod, denser crowds.
There could be a lot of reasons.
I'm pretty sure people do care about power. If that's not the case, then PS4 wouldn't be outselling Xbone even after the price cut, and kinect removed.
You took offense to big meanie?
I love you, man. I wound never offend anyone on this forum. I love all you people.
It's going to be a very long generation for many. I just don't see an outcome where any publisher shows clear favouritism this gen, in terms of graphics.
Man I don't know.
I went to futureshop, asked them for a monitor I can take with me,if it has an HDMI port and if it was HDCP compatible.
Don't know its resolution output. Its 22 inches though.
Bought it so I can play video games when I have free time.
aww i like this post. i like you, man. but not in a way that intrudes upon your personal space.
PS4 is easier to develop for. It's probably the lead platform platform for all multiplatform games.Why is everyone so self-righteous about their ps4 edition of this game?
When you watch a movie in DVD or Bluray which one do you pay more for? The blu-ray one because it includes better sound and better picture quality sometimes a behind-the-scenes bonus but you pay roughly 50% more.
Game developers do not get anything back because they push their game to 1080p or 60fps there is no return on investment here. They still only get 60$ just like on the XO version and there is nothing justifying the extra cost just because a little group of people rants about 600k extra freaking pixels.
If the technology and investment is already there then of course you can push forward like for example InfamouS.
A company like ubisoft which created a new engine version because if next-gen then it is going to take time and investment to reach higher grounds.
1080p or 60fps is just extra gravy if the initial budget only covers the technology necessary to reach the minimum reference quality - in this case Xbox one
Of course there can always be some external "tampering" - which ms in this case is accused for but in my opinion that is a lot less likely.
Unity probably already costs A lot of freaking money and I am pretty sure they are running out of money for anymore changes. For them to invest extra resources for a freaking res-bump is not a priority.
This PR is howecer extremely and so freaking poorly planned and written that it would hace been beat if it wasnt released.
It's going to be a very long generation for many. I just don't see an outcome where any publisher shows clear favouritism this gen, in terms of graphics.
You took offense to big meanie?
I love you, man. I wound never offend anyone on this forum. I love all you people.
Since they're running out of CPU power I suppose the xbone is the true victim to getting the dumbed down version.![]()
You guys don't seriously think Microsoft payed Ubi to gimp the PS4 version of the game do you? Seriously?
The PS4 was $100 cheaper then the X1. That is the reason people have chose the console. Power means nothing, as we saw with the Wii.
This is off topic though.
Why would you say that?
I think the theory, from what I can gather, is that MS paid (or stipulated, or wink-wink-nudge-nudged as part of the marketing support) for the Xbox One version to be one that's not missing any features or bullet points relative to its competition.You guys don't seriously think Microsoft payed Ubi to gimp the PS4 version of the game do you? Seriously?
I starting to come to the same conclusion.
Third party devs will likely aim for the lowest common denominator between the console
platforms, due to cost related factors.
I feel Cerny/Sony should have designed an absolute power house with regards to the PS4
as opposed to the marginally better console we ended up with(compared to the XB1).
Multiplatform games shouldn't suffer on PS4 because the Xbox One can't handle it. Xbox One isn't leading the market, PS4 is. There's no reason games shouldnt' take advantage of the PS4s power. It won't double the budget.
Since they're running out of CPU power I suppose the xbone is the true victim to getting the dumbed down version.![]()
Interesting thread.
Give me a better reason then not wanting debates to happen.
I think this is not so much a case of "lazy devs" since they were apparently aiming for 1080p/60 fps on both consoles just a couple of months ago.
This is probably a case of "top men" from the publishing side telling the devs that they can't put the PS4 version above the Xbox version in terms of resolution or frame rate.
PS: 100 pages is one day, keep it coming GAF.
I always wanna intrude on your personal space, if you know what I mean.
Why do you keep saying this when the opposite has been true? The most recent big release was Shadow of Mordor, and that was another one where there were very clear visual differences between the PS4 and Xbox One versions of the game. It's not about showing favortism toward one platform or another. It's about actually maximizing what both can do. Warner Bros. chose to do that while UBI isn't with ACU.
I seriously don't understand this. Why not be the voice for Gamers, and the industry in a positive way, instead of thrashing them?
You know it says it right on the box.
You guys don't seriously think Microsoft payed Ubi to gimp the PS4 version of the game do you? Seriously?
It's going to be a very long generation for many. I just don't see an outcome where any publisher shows clear favouritism this gen, in terms of graphics.
I've been here too so you have to treat us equally for parity and stuff.Well look who just joined the party.
Are you really serious with that statement? You really think some just don't buy the best performing console? I bought a 360 last gen because of the shity ps3 ports. The wii sold great because of motion controls. My parents in their 50's had one.
Maybe there will with the odd release here and there, but the major new IP or franchises I expect to look identical. Destiny, AC, being examples.
You guys don't seriously think Microsoft payed Ubi to gimp the PS4 version of the game do you? Seriously?
the difference between 900p and 1080p is so small that if ubisoft didn't say anything, no one would notice except for the ones who make the effort to count the pixels.
You guys don't seriously think Microsoft payed Ubi to gimp the PS4 version of the game do you? Seriously?
It's off topic, but yes I'm serious, and I stand by it.
The PS4s appeal to the mainstream was down to price, not power.
Off topic though as I've said.
Maybe there will with the odd release here and there, but the major new IP or franchises I expect to look identical. Destiny, AC, being examples.
Moneyhat or not, Microsoft and the Xbox One is obviously the reason for this "parity".It's difficult to see why else Ubisoft would intentionally hobble the PS4 version without a cash incentive from their marketing partner.
I think the theory, from what I can gather, is that MS paid (or stipulated as part of the marketing support) for the Xbox One version to be one that's not missing any features or bullet points relative to its competition.
LMAO!