Not too bad for my first ever prediction.69. Xando - 200,000
Was thinking about 520k but didn't expect Sony to pass the 500k.
Not too bad for my first ever prediction.69. Xando - 200,000
Man, so many middle-of-thr-pack months in a row for me. No idea how I'm still clinging to top 10 overall (barely)... (11th* considering aquamarine).
She missed the deadline one month, so donny kept track of her position including that month as a courtesy.
NeoGAF Prediction Results - September 2014
Units
21. Road - 135,000
I'm sorry, but that's pathetic. If trouble could otherwise not be avoided I'd rather have no numbers than resort to such childishness. GAF isn't exactly an exclusive club and it shouldn't be, either way.Hey Sales-Age. I just wanted to say something quick about a new system.
First, some background:
There is a massive amount of people who just lurk GAF, look for leaks, and then leave.
They don't contribute to the community, they spread the leaks all around the Internet and raise GAF's notoriety, and they raise the chances of us getting into trouble with NPD.
With the email tag system, leak origins + leak reposts will be obfuscated for that massive portion of people, making it safer to leak stuff because leaks will be limited to GAF members only.
NPD has done some pretty nasty, brutal crackdowns in the past 5 years (RIP GameCrate.com)...we don't want to incur their wrath.
Making GAF leaks a members-only affair through email tags would really cut down on the amount of sharing around the Internet.
You'd still have people sharing it...but it'd become very niche very quickly.
(PLEASE QUOTE THIS POST)
The PS4 sucks and the Xbox One is obviously going to win the USA.
XBOX ONE RULES, SONY SUCKS. WHO'S WITH ME.
Now I'm part of a healthy, rigorous discussion on the merits of the Wii U console. In October 2014, the Wii U only sold (QUOTE ME FOR NUMBERS) so it can be assumed that the Wii U is not going to recover because XYZ reasons reasons
I'm sorry, but that's pathetic. If trouble could otherwise not be avoided I'd rather have no numbers than resort to such childishness. GAF isn't exactly an exclusive club and it shouldn't be, either way.
I'd rather hold on to the tradition of open discussions (in the sense that anyone can listen in, if they are so inclined) than secret winks to knowing conspirators. Obviously we shouldn't have leakers suffer the consequences of our lust for numbers. I don't find that to be a very venerable tradition by comparison.Places like chartzzz are taking leaks on Gaf and spreading it about. This is causing NPD ninjas coming down hard on leakers. NPD sales age is a tradition on GAF i want to see it continue and not die off.
Places like chartzzz are taking leaks on Gaf and spreading it about. This is causing NPD ninjas coming down hard on leakers. NPD sales age is a tradition on GAF i want to see it continue and not die off.
Who's doing that?If the people who graciously share any NPD or other tracker info they're privy to feel the desire or need to obfuscate that sharing so as to avoid drawing unnecessary further distribution of that [technically proprietary and expensive] information, and the attention it brings to the site, then it's entirely their prerogative.
I'm not sure why some are taking it as some sort of right to get anything out of these members.
As someone who gains a benefit from it, I'm perfectly fine with jumping through a minor extra hoop.
I'm speaking towards both this and the NPD thread, as well as some past threads. We stopped doing summaries, which people seemed to take as a major inconvenience. The suggestion is now that the numbers be obfuscated, which some are finding an inconvenience.Who's doing that?
Who's doing that?
If trouble could otherwise not be avoided I'd rather have no numbers than resort to such childishness
How is the Xbone fairing in comparison with the 360 over the same time period?
It seems Microsofts PR isn't trumping the X% over the 360 anymore, have their current trajectories crossed yet? or when will they?
To me this isn't a matter of convenience. I find it ignoble (not what the leakers would do, but what we'd be encouraging and how). I'm not going to "simply ignore" it, if this is how we proceed. Chances are, I won't, but whether I personally participate changes little. I'm a bit shocked you find this to be such a minor matter.I'm speaking towards both this and the NPD thread, as well as some past threads. We stopped doing summaries, which people seemed to take as a major inconvenience. The suggestion is now that the numbers be obfuscated, which some are finding an inconvenience.
The reality is having easy access to these numbers isn't a given unless you're willing to pay thousands of dollars a month.
You say you'd prefer we have no numbers at all. Okay, that's fine. Simply ignore the posts and or threads.
However, if someone does want to know this information, then they shouldn't complain about how those who have it choose to disseminate it.
No, I'm saying the exact opposite. I don't think I have any right to know the numbers.You?
Perhaps you could elaborate on what about obfuscating leaks you find so offensive. I'm not really sure what's encouraged beyond the continued provision of information in whatever manner the person chooses to provide it.To me this isn't a matter of convenience. I find it ignoble (not what the leakers would do, but what we'd be encouraging and how). I'm not going to "simply ignore" it, if this is how we proceed. Chances are, I won't, but whether I personally participate changes little. I'm a bit shocked you find this to be such a minor matter.
It's still doing much better.
![]()
credit - Road
Apparently 360 didn't really take off until the following year when people realised PS3 wasn't really much of a viable alternative. I'm sure someone else can add further to that, I didn't really pay attention to sales back then.
I don't find it offensive, I find it ignoble.Perhaps you could elaborate on what about obfuscating leaks you find so offensive. I'm not really sure what's encouraged beyond the continued provision of information in whatever manner the person chooses to provide it.
Absolutely. Again, I'm not questioning their position in all of this. I also don't think that people who then consume the information are base or something like that. It's just that in my idealistic view of this forum, I would have seen us rather abstain.It's their prerogative whether they only want to share certain information with the closed community, with the general public/lurkers/google search, with individuals of their choosing privately, or not at all.
I didn't know about that. I don't think participation should be a right everyone irrevocably holds. The moderation on this forum is exceptionally good. What members say publicly in a thread, however, should always be public. A great forum's intent and merit is its ability to educate.I could be wrong but there are sections of GAF, from memory, that are inaccessible without active membership - namely the sales archives. Non-members aren't able to actively participate in any discourse.
If the people who graciously share any NPD or other tracker info they're privy to feel the desire or need to obfuscate that sharing so as to avoid drawing unnecessary further distribution of that [technically proprietary and expensive] information, and the attention it brings to the site, then it's entirely their prerogative.
I'm not sure why some are taking it as some sort of right to get anything out of these members.
As someone who gains a benefit from it, I'm perfectly fine with jumping through a minor extra hoop.
And if the alternative is that so much attention is drawn that we're no longer able to gain any info from these members, then I'll choose the minor inconvenience.
113. Cess007 - 262,000
It makes it clearer, yes. But I think you're taking it a bit too seriously in terms of outward facing perception of the forum, at least based on your analogies. Or perhaps I just have a less idealised image of what GAF and forums in general are.I don't find it offensive, I find it ignoble.
In the other thread a "members only" tag was suggested. These are means a forum for sharing fetish pornography would seek refuge with. One could say we ourselves are identifying this information and its distributors as shady, seedy and sleazy, exhibiting fear of what the greater public might think about us and do about it, if only it knew.
I don't mean to say that this is what we'd be doing, but if similar problems are solved in the same fashion, it's because of deeper reasons. We'd be using secrecy and hidden signs, while keeping a pretense of everyday occurrence. That's my problem. These numbers in my mind aren't worth redefining what a full member of this forum is as opposed to a lurker or junior. We're gathering in back alleys imperceptibly marked as if we were criminals.
The change is minor (a member clicks "quote" on posts with a bolded letter in NPD threads), but the shift in demeanor and self-conception is huge.
Does that make it clearer?
Absolutely. Again, I'm not questioning their position in all of this. I also don't think that people who then consume the information are base or something like that. It's just that in my idealistic view of this forum, I would have seen us rather abstain.
I didn't know about that. I don't think participation should be a right everyone irrevocably holds. The moderation on this forum is exceptionally good. What members say publicly in a thread, however, should always be public. A great forum's intent and merit is its ability to educate.
5. occelinho - 87,000
(PLEASE QUOTE THIS POST)
The PS4 sucks and the Xbox One is obviously going to win the USA.
XBOX ONE RULES, SONY SUCKS. WHO'S WITH ME.
Now I'm part of a healthy, rigorous discussion on the merits of the Wii U console. In October 2014, the Wii U only sold (QUOTE ME FOR NUMBERS) so it can be assumed that the Wii U is not going to recover because XYZ reasons reasons
Can you post the numbers you used for the predictions? (It's the easier way to see the NPD sales =P).
donny, which numbers you used for 360 and PS3?
Assuming you're asking me, I don't feel any sort of right to get any information from anyone. I think the obfuscation you guys are doing is silly and pointless, and it makes the thread difficult or impossible to catch up with quickly. I think that has the end result of degrading the quality of the discussion. Personally, i think if someone is not comfortable posting something on GAF, then they should just refrain from doing so.
I understand that GAF has rules, and we have to abide by them. Evilore and the mods run the site, and I respect that. I am surprised to see rules apparently being invented by members in the middle of the night, though.
I'm probably in the minority on this, but you asked so I answered.
I'm sorry, but that's pathetic. If trouble could otherwise not be avoided I'd rather have no numbers than resort to such childishness. GAF isn't exactly an exclusive club and it shouldn't be, either way.
Listen very carefully.
You think I want to do any of this? You think I WANT to hide things behind quote tags? You think I'm being deliberately obtuse just for the fun of it?
NPD knows about GAF, and they're not happy. They weren't happy back in 2006, they're not happy now.
One of these months it's going to get to a point where they're going to crackdown on the numbers like they did back in late 2006.
No more Creamsugar. No more Aquamarine.
What then? Guess what...no more leaks from anyone.
I do a LOT of research about how NPD numbers are represented outside GAF.
And the vast majority of people just blindly come to GAF for leaks, get the leaks, and then leave.
If there is ANYTHING I can do to appease The NPD Group to just make the leaks a little bit more inaccessible or more obfuscated so that GAF isn't one big *get your leaks here, everyone!* public repository, that will help calm them down.
I can't believe you would call that "childish" or "stupid." Dealing with The NPD Group has been a real headache.
Creamsugar has been leaking and the community has been summarizing his leaks for years, an entire generation long, why would GAF get in trouble now? GAF has been exactly that repository and the NPD Group hasn't and probably couldn't do anything about it.
I don't think the email tag system is a good idea, people on other sites will get their numbers eventually, they have members here, they will post it elsewhere, either as information or for comparison's sake, it will even happen here, then what? Numbers will come out eventually. Keeping it exclusive between us is really weird. I think this is just your personal beef with vgshart
Please let us continue what the NPD thread has been as usual.
Creamsugar has been leaking and the community has been summarizing his leaks for years, an entire generation long, why would GAF get in trouble now? GAF has been exactly that repository and the NPD Group hasn't and probably couldn't do anything about it.
I don't think the email tag system is a good idea, people on other sites will get their numbers eventually, they have members here, they will post it elsewhere, either as information or for comparison's sake, it will even happen here, then what? Numbers will come out eventually. Keeping it exclusive between us is really weird. I think this is just your personal beef with vgshart
Please let us continue what the NPD thread has been as usual.
Listen very carefully.
You think I want to do any of this? You think I WANT to hide things behind quote tags? You think I'm being deliberately obtuse just for the fun of it?
NPD knows about GAF, and they're not happy. They weren't happy back in 2006, they're not happy now.
One of these months it's going to get to a point where they're going to crackdown on the numbers like they did back in late 2006.
No more Creamsugar. No more Aquamarine.
What then? Guess what...no more leaks from anyone.
I do a LOT of research about how NPD numbers are represented outside GAF.
And the vast majority of people just blindly come to GAF for leaks, get the leaks, and then leave.
If there is ANYTHING I can do to appease The NPD Group to just make the leaks a little bit more inaccessible or more obfuscated so that GAF isn't one big *get your leaks here, everyone!* public repository, that will help calm them down.
I can't believe you would call that "childish" or "stupid." Dealing with The NPD Group has been a real headache.
Look...I can't deal with all this opposition right now. You just don't have any idea...at all. You're completely ignorant. You think NPD is okay with Creamsugar and leaks. They're not. With each year they're getting more and more intolerant of it.
I'm very close to requesting a ban for myself. *Sigh*
I think I need to take a break from NeoGAF for a while.
Breathe, Aqua, please just breathe~Look...I can't deal with all this opposition right now. You just don't have any idea...at all. You're completely ignorant. You think NPD is okay with Creamsugar and leaks. They're not. With each year they're getting more and more intolerant of it.
I'm very close to requesting a ban for myself. *Sigh*
I think I need to take a break from NeoGAF for a while.
Look...I can't deal with all this opposition right now. You just don't have any idea...at all. You're completely ignorant. You think NPD is okay with Creamsugar and leaks. They're not. With each year they're getting more and more intolerant of it.
I'm very close to requesting a ban for myself. *Sigh*
I think I need to take a break from NeoGAF for a while.
Look...I can't deal with all this opposition right now. You just don't have any idea...at all. You're completely ignorant. You think NPD is okay with Creamsugar and leaks. They're not. With each year they're getting more and more intolerant of it.
I'm very close to requesting a ban for myself. *Sigh*
I think I need to take a break from NeoGAF for a while.
Look...I can't deal with all this opposition right now. You just don't have any idea...at all. You're completely ignorant. You think NPD is okay with Creamsugar and leaks. They're not. With each year they're getting more and more intolerant of it.
I'm very close to requesting a ban for myself. *Sigh*
I think I need to take a break from NeoGAF for a while.
I wonder if she ment to qoute the guy above that post instead.Chill. I'm on your side. I'm saying we should hide the numbers more. I know NPD has cracked down on GAF before.
Do what you want to do Aqua. As nice as the leaks are, you shouldn't throw out your account over it
Either obfuscate as best as possible with the tags or simply stop leaking if it gets too much
Same for Sugar if he/she is reading this
Look...I can't deal with all this opposition right now. You just don't have any idea...at all. You're completely ignorant. You think NPD is okay with Creamsugar and leaks. They're not. With each year they're getting more and more intolerant of it.
I'm very close to requesting a ban for myself. *Sigh*
I think I need to take a break from NeoGAF for a while.