Batman: Arkham Knight Aiming for identical Res/Framerate Across Xbox One and PS4

why is everyone melting down? he's just saying what they are aiming for, doesn't mean they are actively reducing things to get parity. They are aiming for parity.

But they shouldn't be aiming for parity; they should be aiming to get the most out of each console. What's the point of the two consoles being different if their differences aren't going to be fully utilised? Are going to have to solely rely on exclusive developers to show us what our consoles can do?

Fuck that.
 
It's always been like that. The weaker platform decides how multiplatform games look. It's simple economics, developing for the weaker platform and doing a straight port to a more powerful system is efficient. Sometimes you get higher resolution as a free bonus, sometimes you don't. Depends on what is the limiting factor.
Tell that to last gen. The 360 shit on the PS3 but all the PS3 would get was shit ports with awful performance, if at all.
 
why is everyone melting down? he's just saying what they are aiming for, doesn't mean they are actively reducing things to get parity. They are aiming for parity.
We are not melting down, we'll wait the ADS news for that :3

People are just saying that parity is not acceptable. Somehow Rocksteady will read this thread so let's just make it clear. If they choose to ignore it, well... We'll make our own choices too. There are a lot of great games coming in 2015 if you see what I mean.
 
But they shouldn't be aiming for parity; they should be aiming to get the most out of each console. What's the point of the two consoles being different if their differences aren't going to be fully utilised? Are going to have to solely rely on exclusive developers to show us what our consoles can do?

Fuck that.

I am guessing that he used that term loosely.. it's Rocksteady.. I'm guessing he just means "this game is going to be baddass on every system... we're not sweating resolution and frame rate at this second."
 
What do you want them to say? "Hey, our game is a lot better on PS4 than it is on Xbox, but you Xbox owners should probably still buy it lol.

Nah, that shit ain't gonna happen. People expect a good experience regardless of platform, and the fact of the matter is that people usually don't give shit about framerate and resolution, within reasonable boundries.
 
I find it surprising that facing the obvious backlash Ubisoft faced that a company would actually be willing to utter the word parity
.

They don't even need to expand to that based on the question.


What do you want them to say? "Hey, our game is a lot better on PS4 than it is on Xbox, but you Xbox owners should probably still buy it lol.

Nah, that shit ain't gonna happen. People expect a good experience regardless of platform, and the fact of the matter is that people usually don't give shit about framerate and resolution, within reasonable boundries.

All they need to say is they will be taking advantage of each platform's strengths.
 
But they shouldn't be aiming for parity; they should be aiming to get the most out of each console. What's the point of the two consoles being different if their differences aren't going to be fully utilised? Are going to have to solely rely on exclusive developers to show us what our consoles can do?

Fuck that.

What parity are they aiming at? What did he exactly say?

Only resolution and frame rate.

There's a ton of other things like AA, lighting, shadows, textures, etc that define graphics that can be different on the platforms to utilize the power difference. Hardware power isn't only evident through resolution and fps.
 
It's always been like that. The weaker platform decides how multiplatform games look. It's simple economics, developing for the weaker platform and doing a straight port to a more powerful system is efficient. Sometimes you get higher resolution as a free bonus, sometimes you don't. Depends on what is the limiting factor.

No it hasn't, see Dragon Ball Z: Budokai on PS2 and Gamecube or Splinter Cell on Xbox and PS2. And I'm sure there are many other examples.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yWyekzTAe4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkHoDEh0FWc
 
I thought about in the last days to pre-order it
But now, NO
NEVER.
F*CK THAT
I'll not support this.

Well I have a preorder for the PS4 version on Amazon and I'm very tempted to cancel.
Might as well wait till it hits €20 instead of paying close to 60 for a half-assed portjob. :-/
 
What parity are they aiming at? What did he exactly say?

Only resolution and frame rate.

There's a ton of other things like AA, lighting, shadows, textures, etc that define graphics that can be different on the platforms to utilize the power difference. Hardware power isn't only evident through resolution and fps.

they will be CPU bound somehow, both versions will look identical
 
Boycotting because of this is stupid. They really should try to utilize each system to the fullest, but boycotts because the PS4 doesn't have a bit higher resolution, framerate, or better effects?

To each their own I guess.

In what planet do you live that boycotting a gimped game, an intentional one at that is stupid? It's the most rational thing one can do. It's not like I deprave myself of the game, I just choose that my money doesn't go to the publisher and reward them.
 
What do you want them to say? "Hey, our game is a lot better on PS4 than it is on Xbox, but you Xbox owners should probably still buy it lol.

Nah, that shit ain't gonna happen. People expect a good experience regardless of platform, and the fact of the matter is that people usually don't give shit about framerate and resolution, within reasonable boundries.

So they don't want to piss off people who don't give a shit about something but choose to really piss off the people who do. Good to know.
 
It's a matter of first-party games setting the standard as always. PS4 needs a few more titles to push the PS4 - and keep it high.

Third party will do whatever they want. Vote with your wallet is all that you can do - besides rage a bit for some negative PR. No sane third party will ship 2 completely different games graphics wise to the market. However, third-party should take advantage of power advantages when available. Parity talk is just PR suicide as well as the wrong mindset of going about creating the best possible game on each system. Parity = opposite.
 
But, but, but we have to support the devs...

For real, this is one of the reasons/examples why it feels so good and right that i stopped buying games day one at full price.

This, all the cut content to nickel and dime the gamer, and the new trend to release broken and completely unfinished games on disc (TEW, ACU) just deserves to be punished.

I have no sympathy for this industry anymore.
 
What parity are they aiming at? What did he exactly say?

Only resolution and frame rate.

There's a ton of other things like AA, lighting, shadows, textures, etc that define graphics that can be different on the platforms to utilize the power difference. Hardware power isn't only evident through resolution and fps.

Lol, I've said this exact same thing a couple of times in this thread now. You don't have to tell me. ;)

And I never said they are aiming for parity across everything, I'm just throwing around some 'what ifs'.
 
The PS4 is significantly more powerful than the Xbox One, has an easier memory setup and at least at the start of the generation seemed to have a better SDK.

If both console versions run at parity, that actually means they are making time to do optimizations or niche additions for the Xbox One.

I'm not disagreeing with you guys at all. I said that the Devs seem to have this mindset. If someone told me my GTX770 Sli system is basically the same as a single 750ti so lets make a game to run for a 750ti, I would be like... wtf? I didn't pay an extra 250 so my games can look the same.

I get the outrage, I really do. But my point is the Devs either don't care, or don't have time to optimize the PS4 version. So instead, they'll just have one version. And honestly, I don't like it one bit (and I own neither system).
 
In what planet do you live that boycotting a gimped game, an intentional one at that is stupid? It's the most rational thing one can do. It's not like I deprave myself of the game, I just choose that my money doesn't go to the publisher and reward them.

It's stupid because they have yet to even say what they are aiming for parity in. If it's simply res and FPS then we could assume the PS4 will have better enhancements in other areas. If they manage to get the XBO version to 1080p/60fps then it'll be parity there, but the PS4 will likely run better overall.

Saying a game is "gimped" before it's even done is a bit crazy to me. Maybe I'm alone in that sentiment.

I don't see people melting down at Rockstar for GTAV parity. Where are the boycotts there?
 
If they've gone for true parity where it's just an Xbox one game that happens to be on the ps4, then fuck em, I didn't buy a ps4 over of an XO for shits and giggles.

If it's just 1080p 30fps on both, but actually makes use of the ps4's extra horsepower for greater draw distances, better/more effects, than that's fine.

But the fact is Microsoft did not design the XO to be the most powerful games machine they could, and their customers aren't buying it to get the best versions of games possible. It's ridiculous that the customers who did buy a system because it was more powerful, and offered the best bang for their buck, are potentially being given a sub par product just so as to apparently not hurt the owners of the weaker consoles feelings.

It's especially ridiculous when the pc version is allowed to take as much advantage of the hardware as is available. Just makes the entire thing look like a corrupt, back room deal to favour Microsoft.
 
Maybe that's Major Nelson kneeling down and waving the cash. We'll never know... ;)

If that's the case what's MajorNelson paying for????

Sorry horrible image just sprang to mind...
'Major Nelson really does believe in Phil Spencer'... Lol
 
I'm not seeing the problem here? So the console versions will both look great, with PC being even better(as usual).

Seems a win/win for everyone.
 
Hmmm this is very interesting. Last gen this was almost unheard of, i dont know of any games where the devs aimed for parity and hurt the 360 version for the sake of the PS3. Why is this a thing all of a sudden?

Different circumstances I guess. PS3 was just a mess to develop for so I would assume most devs just made sure their game was playable and left it at that, whereas now the similarity in architecture allows them to build and optimize for XB1, throw that onto PS4, and call it a day.

It's still bullshit though
 
What do you want them to say? "Hey, our game is a lot better on PS4 than it is on Xbox, but you Xbox owners should probably still buy it lol.

Nah, that shit ain't gonna happen. People expect a good experience regardless of platform, and the fact of the matter is that people usually don't give shit about framerate and resolution, within reasonable boundries.

Microsoft chose the hardware they chose and the information was public months before people dropped money on these consoles. Developers shouldn't be coddling people who've made their beds.
 
Damn, this thread was a double dose of bad news. I didn't know it had gotten delayed til June. I thought it was still January
 
It's always been like that. The weaker platform decides how multiplatform games look. It's simple economics, developing for the weaker platform and doing a straight port to a more powerful system is efficient. Sometimes you get higher resolution as a free bonus, sometimes you don't. Depends on what is the limiting factor.

Its almost like you skipped last gen or something.
 
Jesus, no gives a fuck except PS4 fanbois who can only afford one console or PC elitists. 99% of the world doesn't care and couldn't tell the difference unless they were running next to each other on the exact same screens. Even then, the general gaming population is simply not visually savvy enough to see the difference.

#firstworldfuckingproblems



THIS.

Meltdown initiated
 
Please guys
Cancel your pre-order
We cant support this shit
It have to stop !

Yep I just did myself also. I was going to go for pc instead but screw it, I don't want them to get any of my money if this is what they are going to pull. I will buy it used on the cheap.
 
In what planet do you live that boycotting a gimped game, an intentional one at that is stupid? It's the most rational thing one can do. It's not like I deprave myself of the game, I just choose that my money doesn't go to the publisher and reward them.

100% agreed.

It isn't like every console has the Wii U release schedule or has that ridiculous drought we just went through. I am sure there will be plenty of games that are worthy of your money when this game releases in 2015. 2015 is stacked for games and will make a lot of peoples wallets bleed as it is. I see no problem with letting these shitbag pubs know this will not be tolerated while enjoying the releases that don't aim for this parity nonsense. The games that do can get relegated to Steam Sales or Bomba retail sales.
 
Top Bottom