Not to throw flames on the fire or anything BUUUUUUUT
Sony has kept dropping little Crash references here and there, to which two camps believe
A) Its the 20th anniversary and he was a big part of it, nothing to read into it
B) OMG CRASH IS BACK
So rational people will say A, makes sense, completely agreed....for a while.
BUT if Crash is only mentioned because of the anniversary then Spyro would be mentioned as well, except he's not. No official twitter/blog nothing has mentioned Spyro in any capacity. No interviews with Insomniac, not even name dropped when listing PS1 classics by devs. Spyro is clearly owned by Activision and the Skylanders series, so no mention of him at any of the events makes sense. So then why is Crash being mentioned if the same case is true?
I think Crash is coming back. For real this time.
Sony has kept dropping little Crash references here and there, to which two camps believe
A) Its the 20th anniversary and he was a big part of it, nothing to read into it
B) OMG CRASH IS BACK
So rational people will say A, makes sense, completely agreed....for a while.
BUT if Crash is only mentioned because of the anniversary then Spyro would be mentioned as well, except he's not. No official twitter/blog nothing has mentioned Spyro in any capacity. No interviews with Insomniac, not even name dropped when listing PS1 classics by devs. Spyro is clearly owned by Activision and the Skylanders series, so no mention of him at any of the events makes sense. So then why is Crash being mentioned if the same case is true?
I think Crash is coming back. For real this time.