Street Fighter 5 for PS4 & PC teaser trailer

crinale

Member
It's not like Sony's gonna just sit back and let MS regain the lead.
IMHO ppl are stating Sony being too complacent for past few weeks, and this happened..
 
If you want it that bad, buy a ps4(or PC). I have to buy an Xbone to play Killer Instinct, and a Wii U to play Smash Bros. It's really that simple. The bitching and complaining is amusing though. Sad, but amusing.

GAF needs more of these to let us see who we are really dealing with.
 

Peltz

Member
This is the biggest 3rd party console exclusive announcement of this generation. Sony must have really done some financial gymnastics to get this one. I look forward to it and feel a bit for my Xbox One brethren.

Hopefully it comes to more platforms in the future so everyone can enjoy it.
 
Megaton!

Looks like they had to recycle some sf4 assets and increase the detail.

I assume that to keep the budget down capcom will push for reused assets wherever possible. Chun looks a lot like a upgraded sf4 model.

This isn't a bad thing to me.
 

MisterR

Member
Yeah exactly how I feel. If it is a full exclusive the only reason I give Sony the benefit of the doubt that they didn't money hat the thing is not because of idealism but I just don't believe they have the capital to keep it off a competitor platform.

This kind of thinking keeps coming up. Do you all also assume Sony can't afford to make new games? Because making a new AAA game would cost much more than moneyhatting a game for six months.
 

Loydx2

Banned
Tomb raider not oke, SFV and Titanfall is oke.
I hate when they force you to one console for your favorite games.
But as long as there are multiple option its not really exclusive.
Thats why the fallout for Tomb Raider was a lot more than SFV.
And please quit it with the GAF pro Sony BS or so now it is oke for exclusivity.
Ya'll sound like children with that attitude.

I was going by mostly positive reactions. Titanfall was about to be cclosd and Sony didn't help. Tomb raider is timed and i understand the anger. SF has been on all consoles so its the same as tomb raider but wors3 if it's not timed but the reaction is nowhere near the same


My point is this is a big slap to Xbox owners that played all 100 version s of SF. This third party exclusivity needs to stop for games that are established on both consoles. IE tomb raider and street fighter.
 

keit4

Banned
I'm not convinced this exclusive isn't only for Japan (or just not mentioning XB1 due to PSX). However, if it is actually exclusive, despite my general hatred of money hat exclusives I can't really say I have any sympathy after the Tomb Raider debacle that MS pulled.

"It's ok because MS did it before".

10 year old mentality right here.
 

Paracelsus

Member
Then isn't the PC being held back by the lesser hardware of e PS4?

Come on son

Some games can exist thanks exclusively to the PC platform. Beat em ups most certainly can't. 99% of smartphone/PC ports exist because someone paid full price on portable/home consoles first, validating their development. It's pretty easy to follow.
 
Its official, Capcom is my most hated developer of this generation. Also, this sucks for the FGC big time.

@HIR0

Won't make a difference. Only if the game isn't released to arcade, THEN Japanese folks will be pissed.

Huh. I think you meant to put Ubisoft in there.
Why Capcom?
 
Its official, Capcom is my most hated developer of this generation. Also, this sucks for the FGC big time.

lol no?

ubimgep5.jpg
 

ZeroX03

Banned
I mean Street Fighter was always kind of a Playstation game, (all the alphas and other series spin offs came out on PS first). We just all played on 360 because that was the popular console at the time and the online was superior when vanilla SF IV came out.

Not really. It predated PS1 and Third Strike was on Dreamcast four years earlier. That was just one generation.

This is some try hard trolling.

Welcome to GAF, you just got played.
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
Kinda sucks for xb1 users but i'm definitely getting this. Hope Juri Han returns. :D
 

Yoshi

Headmaster of Console Warrior Jugendstrafanstalt
it's actually exclusive guys

Is it a case where Sony also owns the right for the game (partially) like Bayonetta 2, i.e. it can never come to other platforms at all, or is it a case like Tomb Raider, where they bought exclusiveness for a certain amount of time?
 
It's not like I needed anything else to secure an eventual PS4 purchase...but exclusive SF5 means there was never any choice.

I'm sure there'll eventually be a Super SF5 or Championship Edition or something on XB1, though. I just don't see it possible that XB1 will just miss SF5 entirely.
 

squall23

Member
This kind of thinking keeps coming up. Do you all also assume Sony can't afford to make new games? Because making a new AAA game would cost much more than moneyhatting a game for six months.
Sony certainly did a good job moneyhatting Monster Hunter to stay on Sony platforms.... oh wait.
 

EatMyFace

Banned
Yeah exactly how I feel. If it is a full exclusive the only reason I give Sony the benefit of the doubt that they didn't money hat the thing is not because of idealism but I just don't believe they have the capital to keep it off a competitor platform.
Well Microsoft loves to play this game. No reason Sony can't join in on the fun.
 

Principate

Saint Titanfall
The reason Respawn chose Source engine was because it worked well on PS3, and peering into the code/data of Titanfall you can see many hints at PS builds.

MS saved the development of the game as EA wouldn't front up the rest of it. This is all in "The Final Hours of Titanfall".
 

Felspawn

Member
So is it a PS4 exclusive for ALL OF Street fighter 5 or just the first version, with SUPER Street fighter 5 being "a different game" according to capcom :p
 

Nzyme32

Member
lol playstation giving xbox a taste of its own medicine.


let's face it. xbox is going to continue doing that crap no matter what. if i were playstation, might as well get as many 3rd party exclusives as i can before xbox moneyhats them all.

This is a really silly argument. If this:

"xbox is going to continue doing that crap no matter what"

were true, why would anyone need to invest money in making third party content exclusive. It would be a waste of money. Might as well invest it into first party product or other features and services for playstation fans.
 

Laconic

Banned
Call me when PSN gets some exclusive GOOD netcode.

Because if Xrd is any indication, Sony nabbing this for themselves only, is not a good look.
 
This kind of thinking keeps coming up. Do you all also assume Sony can't afford to make new games? Because making a new AAA game would cost much more than moneyhatting a game for six months.

Its a lot cheaper to fund development of a game to a platform that never was going to exist than paying to keep a game from a huge demographic because there is almost no advantage for the developer in doing that. The Tomb Raider deal is a great example. The amount of money to make that a full exclusive was something even MS wasn't willing to do. That said they were more than willing to pay for a staggered release so it could be a mindshare exclusive.
 

orioto

Good Art™
Looks like he's popping instinct to me. #Kappa

Seriously, though, what the hell is that? Perhaps it is a way of storing EX moves or something. I really hope they have a stage/floor demo during the weekend.

I can be wrong, but i wouldn't be surprised if the dev started 2 weeks ago. This seems like a quick thing to test an engine or that sony asked for the announcement.
 
Top Bottom