fallingdove
Member
You haven't played KI.
I have. Extensively. And KI doesn't look better than this. On par is the best argument you can make at this point given the limited footage we have seen of SFV so far.
You haven't played KI.
If you can't see how that domination resulted in Sony making bad cocky decisions for years with the PS3 then you are blind. They needed to be humbled and getting them back to the point of cockiness doesn't do consumers any good.
This has been mentioned and its a really interesting explanation that we'll honestly probably never get the answer to.
Is that actual SFV footage from the teaser? Looks very similar to it's previous installments. I mean, I expected a little more difference in the graphics department, but at the same time, I could probably understand why they went that route.
Did you somehow miss everything Ono said about the game?Are we really going to argue that the most popular fighting game around was ever in any danger of not being released? Really? Is this really how far we are willing to go in order to somehow, someway justify this?
For the record, as a gamer I despise third party exclusives. I hate them. I do recognize the business realities of the industry though which is why I have absolutely no issue with Sony securing an exclusive for their platform, if in the end it proves to be an exclusive of course. I do have an issue with the people who ripped MS to shreds for securing the Tomb Raider deal and are now singing a different tune. Even if the game proves to not be an exclusive in the end, the double standards on display are pathetic. Not talking about you Neoxon, I don't know how you reacted then so please don't take it personally.
I'm holding out hope! It would be wonderful!It would solve a lot of problems, not only would there be a lot more people playing at once but it would also make sure when one game gets updated the other one would to. Not to mention the netcode would have to be pretty good on both platforms as well.
That's a dream scenario for me though. I don't actually think it will happen sadly.
I have. Extensively. And KI doesn't look better than this. On par is the best argument you can make at this point given the limited footage we have seen of SFV so far.
KI is much better looking than SFV.
It wasn't Ono that said 2018 it was someone else but you are right though.I have a (bad) theory about this.
Initially Ono said that a new Street Fighter would not be ready till 2018.
Now they announced SFV and, by the VERY LITTLE footage shown, it seems some kind of SFIV Plus Plus On Steroids.
My fear is: because of the request for an exclusive Street Fighter, development has been speed-up, and we are getting a title more similar to SFIV than to a "real" new iteration.
Now that I'm actually complaining: i will buy it anyway and play the sheet out of it.![]()
The original KI?![]()
Hypocrites.
Unless we know the exact details about the deal, we don't know if this is actually bad for gamers. For all we know the game wouldn't have existed if it wasn't for Sony's involvement. We don't know.
Look at Demon's Souls. Thank god for first-party interventions!
You know this from that short clip?
I think it got bumped up to 900p for season 2? I could be wrong.Isn't KI in 720p?
You haven't played KI.
But it's not a PS4 exclusive.
I have a (bad) theory about this.
Initially Ono said that a new Street Fighter would not be ready till 2018.
Now they announced SFV and, by the VERY LITTLE footage shown, it seems some kind of SFIV Plus Plus On Steroids.
My fear is: because of the request for an exclusive Street Fighter, development has been speed-up, and we are getting a title more similar to SFIV than to a "real" new iteration.
Now that I'm actually complaining: i will buy it anyway and play the sheet out of it.![]()
This apparently isn't even the Capcom PS4 exclusive we're supposed to be seeing at the PSX event.
I have a (bad) theory about this.
Initially Ono said that a new Street Fighter would not be ready till 2018.
Now they announced SFV and, by the VERY LITTLE footage shown, it seems some kind of SFIV Plus Plus On Steroids.
My fear is: because of the request for an exclusive Street Fighter, development has been speed-up, and we are getting a title more similar to SFIV than to a "real" new iteration.
Now that I'm actually complaining: i will buy it anyway and play the sheet out of it.![]()
Oh Opus.
Sigh, the mods need to clean this garbage up.
I think it got bumped up to 900p for season 2? I could be wrong.
For the record, as a gamer I despise third party exclusives. I hate them. I do recognize the business realities of the industry though which is why I have absolutely no issue with Sony securing an exclusive for their platform, if in the end it proves to be an exclusive of course. I do have an issue with the people who ripped MS to shreds for securing the Tomb Raider deal and are now singing a different tune. Even if the game proves to not be an exclusive in the end, the double standards on display are pathetic. Not talking about you Neoxon, I don't know how you reacted then so please don't take it personally.
I'm pretty sure SNES and Genesis BOTH had Champion Edition and Turbo Hyper Fighting selectable on the same cart.No you didn't, you had Street Fighter 2 Turbo Edition.
CE was announced as an exclusive for the Genesis since they got screwed out of SF2. Nintendo then threw a hissy fit and Capcom gave them the newer Turbo edition so they wouldn't suffer Nintendo's wrath.
Hypocrites.
Yes. Don't like the art style.
Throw me a bone.
So from what I can deduce it's one of several things.
1) Capcom being a Japanese company is developing the game for a Japanese audience first and formost, which in their minds a XB1 is currently not a consideration.
2) Capcom is making SFV a timed exclusive and then later on will port to the XB1 after a period of time.
3) Metrics for official Capcom sponsored tournaments show that most of the player base is mainly using Sony hardware for the events.
4) The game is STILL coming out for the XB1 but Capcom just accidently forgot to put the Xbox One logo on the trailer.
5) Capcom and Microsoft could not come to amicable licensing agreement and the game is no show until this agreement is hashed out to both parties being happy.
6) I don't know, nothing makes sense. SF having worldwide appeal, you would hope Capcom has enough business sense to release on both PS4 and XB1 considering both consoles have near identical hardware in terms of APU configuration with some notable clockspeed and ram changes being the only significant differences.
Street Fighter II had a bunch of different exclusive version. I'm sure I'll get this wrong as I'm going from memory of 20 years go, but 2 was exclusive to SNES, Champion Edition got an exclusive Genesis port, and Turbo was again exclusive to SNES. I think it wasn't until Super that a version was released simultaneously on SNES and Genesis.
lol come on now. You really believe that one of the most selling Capcom franchise wouldn't get a sequel without the help of Sony or MS?
No just no.
- Japanese trailer
- No press release yet
- Video pulled because it wasn't supposed to be up yet
Maybe all the console warriors on either side should sit down until there's an official announcement worldwide? Because if you're releasing any game in Japan from now on, you're probably not going to consider Xbox as a viable platform to even market for.![]()
This is what Ono said about SFV last year.
Ono would like to make SF5, but expensive; would consider free 2 play Street Fighter
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=636461&highlight=ono
YupExclusives like this sell systems. I dont see why someone would pay to have Tomb Raider as an exclusive, I dont think Tomb Raider sells systems.
"real iteration" is subjective, because nearly every top selling game now and days reuse the same material from the previous game and no one bats an eye.
No it's not. Tekken is the best selling fighting game series of all time, and Tekken 3 is the best selling pure fighting game of all time. The only thing in terms of numbers SF has on Tekken is name recognition.
I'm sorry, I don't know what EVO is. What would've been the right Capcom game?
Tekken 7 would've been the right fighting game for Ps4 man...
I seriously doubt Xbox owners care. They've already got Killer Instinct as a full exclusive.
And even if they do care, they can just grab it on PC, just like PS fans grabbed Titanfall on PC.
Could be a lot of things. Most fighting games tend to sell better on Playstation compared to Xbox for whatever reason, and as of right now the PS4 seems to be the most popular "next-gen" console worldwide. Sony's also likely pitching in money and development assistance, so Capcom may have taken all this information and decided they can forego the development costs and potential profits of an XB1 version without much impact to their bottom line. I believe Arc System Works made a similar decision not too long ago.
What's this water coming down my face ;_;
Chun and Ryu don't look like cavemen anymore! My prayers have been answered.
That's fine but I thought we were talking about graphical fidelity here. And again we barely seen anything of SFV and could be alpha graphics.
Hypocrites.
Hahah the author of that article is here on GAF!
Well... SF is pretty big in the west too. In the US, the Xbone is fairly close in installed base to the PS4, so that may be a good reason, but what do I know?
They forgot to add the logo but wrote "Exclusive to PS4 and PC" instead? That makes no sense.
So a bunch of people with zero interest are talking about exclusivity? *goes back to fgw