backflip10019
Member
Yeah, I liked where Sarah netted out. If I was in the juror's shoes, having heard all of this evidence, I would have a hard time convicting Adnan, too.
I agree with Sarah's final statement that.he might be guilty but there wasn't enough evidence to convict
That said, i cringed when Sarah saidthat she refused to take the neutral party, and then immediately said two sentences later that she wasn't entirely convinced that he did or did not do it. THAT IS THE NEUTRAL PARTY.
The final episode was maddening, bordering on self-parody.
Are we really still talking about payphones and cell tower pings?
What else are they supposed to talk about? The episode is called "What we know", so they reviewed everything one last time. Did you expect Adnan to just finally confess or something?
No, it's been clear for quite a while that this wasn't going anywhere.
Not to mention for a casual listener it was nice to have the refresher. So much churn happened with the evidence in this series as it progressed unless I wrote it out I wouldn't be able to keep it straight.What else are they supposed to talk about? The episode is called "What we know", so they reviewed everything one last time. Did you expect Adnan to just finally confess or something?
What else are they supposed to talk about? The episode is called "What we know", so they reviewed everything one last time. Did you expect Adnan to just finally confess or something?
Can we all just agree that the reach for the serial killer was a bit of a stretch? Granted, it wasn't Sarah, but man.
"what about the fact that Jay knew where her car was?"
BIG PICTURE SARAH
BIG PICTURE
Can we all just agree that the reach for the serial killer was a bit of a stretch? Granted, it wasn't Sarah, but man.
"what about the fact that Jay knew where her car was?"
BIG PICTURE SARAH
BIG PICTURE
It was a huge stretch, but it made me think there must be some lawyer type shit that made that a big deal. Maybe it just gives a big enough chance for the courts to take a second look at the case? Their ultimate goal is to show Adnan possibly didn't do it, not to find the actual killer per se.
But it seems like finding the guy who did do it makes life easier all around to acquit Adnan. At least based on what we have heard from the lawyers working now to get his ruling thrown out sound like anything short of having another guy to lay the blame on means the only hope Adnan has is an appeal for parole based on the Asia letter and possibly the wonky cell records used.
No, it's been clear for quite a while that this wasn't going anywhere.
Can we all just agree that the reach for the serial killer was a bit of a stretch? Granted, it wasn't Sarah, but man.
"what about the fact that Jay knew where her car was?"
BIG PICTURE SARAH
BIG PICTURE
If by going somewhere you mean Adnan is cleared or Adnan confessed or the real killer is found, well then yeah, no shit. Adnan is still in jail. Unless the season was just going to run on indefinitely until something in the case changed, then obviously it was never going to "go anywhere."
I agree with the majority sentiment here: finale was about what I expected it, but it was a good way to wrap everything up, present some new info (wasn't the serial killer theory proposed by a bunch of redditors?), and basically conclude with well, we don't really know who did it for sure, but we also definitely don't know beyond a reasonable doubt that it was Adnan.
Can we all just agree that the reach for the serial killer was a bit of a stretch? Granted, it wasn't Sarah, but man.
"what about the fact that Jay knew where her car was?"
BIG PICTURE SARAH
BIG PICTURE
If by a miracle it comes back positive...holy shit what is wrong with Jay?
I totally get that. I never expected this to be some neat little package tied up in a bow with a secret reveal at the end that shows Adnan is guilty or innocent. But I think the show had the opportunity to explore more ideas and topics than it did. I feel like it dove really deep into things that didn't deserve the time and glossed over aspects of the story that would have been more interesting.
Right. The whole idea is to test DNA. Not necessarily prove that a serial killer did it. Like you said a means to an end. It's possible.I think the Serial Killer thing is a means to an end. It could be true but is very unlikely from what the podcast has investigated but it may be enough to convince a court to mandate DNA testing and re-examining of evidence which could lead to other suspects.
The big picture is getting evidence into court.
Sarah does kind of bring up a good point in the final episode though. Why would Adnan bring so much attention to this story if he was innocent? Like it's been said, Sarah is not that lucky to get the crazy psychopath that wants the credit and attention. And alternately why did Jay and Jen want nothing to do with the podcast? You'd rather the podcast speculate on its own about your involvement and let other people give their testament to your thinking at the time?
Ask yourself what does Adnan have to lose by participating if he is guilty? His circumstances would be exactly the same except he may be able to get of jail if the podcast people can prove legal flaws within the states case that even though they may not exonerate him they bring reasonable doubt onto the evidence that did convict him.
Ask yourself what does Adnan have to lose by participating if he is guilty? His circumstances would be exactly the same except he may be able to get of jail if the podcast people can prove legal flaws within the states case that even though they may not exonerate him they bring reasonable doubt onto the evidence that did convict him.
Jay was (implicitly) threatened by police. If he hadn't done what the prosecutors wanted, he wouldn't have gotten a nice plea bargain. If he hadn't signed the plea bargain, there is a decent chance be in jail, either with or without Adnan. He received no prison time for his roll (Accessory after the fact), and no time for drug charges (he was a drug dealer). He avoided prison time by going along with the authorities.
Plea bargains, criminal informants, and jailhouse snitches are coerced bullshit, and all known to be some of the leading causes of wrongful convictions.
Seems possible. But who was he afraid of in the video store? He hadn't talked to the cops yet. How did he know where the car was? Arggghh!
Sarah does kind of bring up a good point in the final episode though. Why would Adnan bring so much attention to this story if he was innocent? Like it's been said, Sarah is not that lucky to get the crazy psychopath that wants the credit and attention. And alternately why did Jay and Jen want nothing to do with the podcast? You'd rather the podcast speculate on its own about your involvement and let other people give their testament to your thinking at the time?
Well if Adnan killed her, but not in the way the state said he did, he might hope that the show would prove it was impossible and thus help get him released. For instance, he seemed pretty certain about not being able to get to Bestbuy in time for the call, but that could just as easily be because he knew that's not how it happened.
Adnan had nothing to lose by talking to SK, Jay and Jen had everything to lose.
I was pretty shocked to hear Sarah say she thinks Anand did it. Was that her opinion or was she being hypothetical
I was pretty shocked to hear Sarah say she thinks Anand did it. Was that her opinion or was she being hypothetical
They need to think about a different format for the next season. There were drastically diminishing returns for each episode in terms of both information and entertainment value.