LIZARD SQUAD is Back. Planning XBL Attack. "Biggest attack yet". [UP: XBL/PSN Down]

They're indirectly promoting this BS by keeping their accounts up. They're feeding off attention and if their Twitter accounts are gone, they'll have less of a reason to keep the attack going.

I'm sure they can continue to coordinate a DDOS attack on IRC and be okay with the loss of a Twitter account. It's something and nothing all at the same time.
 
Can Sony's engineers fix anything that would stop a DDOS attack? No. So, why are they telling people their engineers are working on the problem? It suggests to me there is possibly more to this.
 
Again, no. They'll have continued downtime until they remediate the core vulnerability.

http://blog.cloudflare.com/understanding-and-mitigating-ntp-based-ddos-attacks/

They are apparently not very good at it compared to Microsoft.

So, have you actually read what that article says? Just wondering.

Because what I see are ways for network admins and ISPs to prevent people inside of their network becoming part of the attack; at least from what I am reading, the article doesn't explain how a person receiving the attack can block it. Maybe you can point that out to me?
 
I don't know what most of those words mean.

"An NTP amplification attack begins with a server controlled by an attacker on a network that allows source IP address spoofing (e.g., it does not follow BCP38). The attacker generates a large number of UDP packets spoofing the source IP address to make it appear the packets are coming from the intended target. These UDP packets are sent to Network Time Protocol servers (port 123) that support the MONLIST command."

More information can be found here

edit: to add, this also means that because the source IP is spoofed there is no way to track it back to it's point of origin via the IP Address. I'm sure there are other ways of tracking a packet back to it's origin but it's rather difficult to do that.
 
These clowns are using Twitter as a platform and nothing is being done about it.
So what? It's not that hard to make another account or go elsewhere. As long as people keep bringing them up, it'll continue. They're seeking attention and everyone is giving it to them. I doubt that will change if Twitter was no longer available.
 
I'm sure they can continue to coordinate a DDOS attack on IRC and be okay with the loss of a Twitter account. It's something and nothing all at the same time.
It's not about communication amongst themselves, but getting reactions from everyone else plus the general exposure.

If they crop up again with another account, they'll need to publicize it again, and hopefully Twitter will keep actively terminating their accounts.
 
The misinformation is spreading fast thanks to the media... One of my mates has just picked up a PS4 and has said "I don't want to put my card details in cos it's been hacked again, hasn't it?"

>_<
 
So what? It's not that hard to make another account or go elsewhere. As long as people keep bringing them up, it'll continue. They're seeking attention and everyone is giving it to them. I doubt that will change if Twitter was no longer available.

So Twitter should just do nothing? They should not be given a platform anywhere in which to parade their attention seeking bullshit.
 
Finest squad is saying on Twitter that Sony took down the network, it is not being hacked. Won't bring it back up until thry are sure it won't happen again.
 
are there any estimates on how many infected computers they need in their botnet to bring down PSN or XBL? a 100,000? millions? because i have no clue.

what if someone wanted to bring down Google and their exponentially more robust defenses? would you theoretically need maybe billions or even tens of billions of computers in your botnet to bring down Google, so it's impossible? that's what i'm thinking in my head but reality might be completely different lol.

some numbers would help me understand this whole thing.
 
So what? It's not that hard to make another account or go elsewhere. As long as people keep bringing them up, it'll continue. They're seeking attention and everyone is giving it to them. I doubt that will change if Twitter was no longer available.

Going over their means of communication is a waste because coordination can be done practically anywhere. They are free to take down the Twitter account but good luck going after an IRC chatroom where the real meat and potatoes are probably happening. Companies should figure out how to operate in spite of the environment of apathetic and attention-seeking hacks, if at all possible. They are not going away anytime soon.
 
So what? It's not that hard to make another account or go elsewhere. As long as people keep bringing them up, it'll continue. They're seeking attention and everyone is giving it to them. I doubt that will change if Twitter was no longer available.

I'm pretty sure Twitter, one of the largest sites in the world, can implement a way to stop certain hashtags from trending and shut down their accounts.
 

that article explain how the attack works and how it can be prevented or at least mitigated by fixing the vulnerabilities on the open NTP servers used to conduct the attack.

said NTP servers are used by the attacker to generate traffic that hits the target of the attack. basically the attacker ask these servers for stuff and provide the ip of the target as the ip to send answers to, and by doing so generating a huge amount of traffic to the target servers that they can't cope with.

the NTP servers used by the attacker are in no way under the control of the target so there is no way any of the solution explained to mitigate the attack can be actually used by the target to stop the attack.
what the article is saying is that if you are running a public and open NTP server you should know better and not leave it unpatched so an attacker can use your NTP server against a third part.

from the point of view of the target (Sony in this case) there are other things that can be done, but are not explained in that article you linked.
 
So Twitter should just do nothing? They should not be given a platform anywhere in which to parade their attention seeking bullshit.
Twitter has shitty policies that should be changed yes, but everyone thinking a closed account will stop this are kidding themselves. This is the internet, people will share things across all social media sites. People have a problem with giving things attention that it wants to create when it can be ignored.
 
I'm sure they can continue to coordinate a DDOS attack on IRC and be okay with the loss of a Twitter account. It's something and nothing all at the same time.
Why are they doing this? For attention/fame. How they're getting all this attention/fame? Via Twitter.

If Twitter keep blocking their accounts, there will be no place for them to e-dickwave anymore. Plus DDoS'ing is a crime, and there's no motive for Twitter to not ban the accounts.
 
Twitter must of taken the week off. I wonder if anyone is still in their offices. Watch as they come back to a lawsuit Monday morning. Who fails on a company in which they use their services to upload pictures all the time? Shame on Twitter. Shame.
 
that article explain how the attack works and how it can be prevented or at least mitigated by fixing the vulnerabilities on the open NTP servers used to conduct the attack.

said NTP servers are used by the attacker to generate traffic that hits the target of the attack. basically the attacker ask these servers for stuff and provide the ip of the target as the ip to send answers to, and by doing so generating a huge amount of traffic to the target server that they can't cope with.

the NTP servers used by the attacker are in no way under the control of the target so there is no way any of the solution explained to mitigate the attack can be actually used by the target to stop the attack.
what the article is saying is that if you are running a public and open NTP server you should know better and not leave it unpatched so an attacker can use your NTP server against a third part.

from the point of view of the target (Sony in this case) there are other things that can be done, but are not explained in that article you linked.

The attack can be mitigated through different filters and blocking DNS requests coming from open DNS hosts at the target level, as explained in the article. I guess taking down your whole network instead of paying your top tier network guys to come in on a holiday to mitigate damage might be cheaper for Sony.
 
Why are they doing this? For attention/fame. How they're getting all this attention/fame? Via Twitter.

If Twitter keep blocking their accounts, there will be no place for them to e-dickwave anymore. Plus DDoS'ing is a crime, and there's no motive for Twitter to not ban the accounts.

There are plenty of places to e-dickwave other than Twitter in this day and age. It wouldn't be the best option for attention but it is an option. You know people would be going there to find out what's happening regardless of the medium of the message.
 

Yes. But you know what the word reflection means? Lets make a laser pointer analogy.

PSN is an eye. 3rd party NTP servers are mirror's. DDoS attackers shine a lot of laser pointers on the mirror so that the reflection (that is also amplified) goes right into the attacked eye (PSN).

Sony can't do anything because they don't have admin access to all 3rd party NTP servers on the planet.
 
Sure, but at what costs? What isn't covered is that DDoS mitigation services are insanely expensive. They can be in excess of 100K+ per incident, or double that for active and ongoing service. There's also a slew of negative problems that come from mitigation services because of how heavy handed they are.

I guarantee Sony has lost far more than that due to this incident. 100k is nothing.
 
Finest squad is saying on Twitter that Sony took down the network, it is not being hacked. Won't bring it back up until thry are sure it won't happen again.

Not true!!!!

I am signed in right now playing killzone mercenary and downloading from the store.
 
Going over their means of communication is a waste because coordination can be done practically anywhere. They are free to take down the Twitter account but good luck going after an IRC chatroom where the real meat and potatoes are probably happening. Companies should figure out how to operate in spite of the environment of apathetic and attention-seeking hacks, if at all possible. They are not going away anytime soon.
Exactly.

I'm pretty sure Twitter, one of the largest sites in the world, can implement a way to stop certain hashtags from trending and shut down their accounts.
Sure but then you run that slippery slope of censoring things and having restrictions. I'm not arguing for this group at all. People just need to understand that if people are doing things "just for the lulz", they'll do it. People will talk and it'll be all over websites and the news like it is now.
 
Top Bottom