Fancy Clown
Member
I suggest you go back and read the TLOU trailer threads. It'll raise a few eyebrows.
did people not like them or something? I remember people thinking they were getting spoiled but the trailers didnt actually spoil anything.
I suggest you go back and read the TLOU trailer threads. It'll raise a few eyebrows.
did people not like them or something? I remember people thinking they were getting spoiled but the trailers didnt actually spoil anything.
Bear in mind I'm going from memory, I was only an observer at the time, but I'm 99% sure a lot of the cynicism being fired at TO is very similar to what was being said pre-release about TLOU.
Bear in mind I'm going from memory, I was only an observer at the time, but I'm 99% sure a lot of the cynicism being fired at TO is very similar to what was being said pre-release about TLOU.
The only things I remember from TLOU threads were the complaints about it being a Uncharted copy, with scripted segments and about it being "about zombies yet again". IIRC it never reached The Order levels of complaints though.
I'm convinced that if this does well, they already have a trilogy scoped out for this thing just by changing the year in the title.
The Order: 1886
The Order: 1986
The Order: 2086 . . . in spaaaaaaace!!!!
As opposed to Gears of War, which does not even boast the unique visual design of Order. Just meatheads with meatguns shooting meat. The response however,TLOU had this E3 demo that showed off the environmental/NPC interactions, the fact that you're in control of the game for longer than 2-3 minute intervals in-between cinematics, the improvisational combat, the smart AI, the dynamic flow of battles, the wonderful animations and sound design, etc.
There were some crying about people applauding after that vicious shotgun blast, but it was applause for an impressive gameplay demonstration, and the response on NeoGAF and across the internet was VERY positive. A demonstration I have yet to be even half as impressed with by THIS cinematic action game. Which is why The Order has always, and will continue, to get shit on by lots of people.
Where's the pie fights and werewolves in tights though?
Disappointed![]()
It's very difficult to post something that can't be seen as an "ad hominem" attack when some people are so deserving of ridicule...
Sorry still no pies or pants but now with sound effects.
I spent waaaay too much time on this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP5mLyvSLvQ
As opposed to Gears of War, which does not even boast the unique visual design of Order. Just meatheads with meatguns shooting meat. The response however,
![]()
Perhaps you can manage to hold back by questioning why you are so defensive of a game you've never played.
Perhaps you can manage to hold back by questioning why you are so defensive of a game you've never played.
Am I the only one who thinks this started off as a Vita title?
Something about how confined the enviroments seem and the fact that is RaD
Sorry still no pies or pants but now with sound effects.
I spent waaaay too much time on this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP5mLyvSLvQ
As opposed to Gears of War, which does not even boast the unique visual design of Order. Just meatheads with meatguns shooting meat. The response however,
![]()
And he wasn't saying it seriously.Thats Gears 2 and while thats a cheesy as hell hype quote the guy had actually played the full game.
The gunplay looked awesome in the PSX demo.And he wasn't saying it seriously.
I think Gears of War's gameplay was highly rated. It had top notch 3rd person shooter mechanics, fun weapons, great set pieces and really good pacing. Its multiplayer was a big deal, too. It was certainly not a 'graphics only' sort of game or anything.
Anyways, I'm optimistic about The Order. I think if they're putting half the effort into the gameplay design that they are with the graphics/presentation, it could be quite good.
I think it's whenIs 0:56 considered as spoiler?
Igraine will actually die? :0
I think it's whenIngraine gets her neck scar
To me The Order exemplifies what I love about Sony consoles and why the general census, especially in the press, feels Sony has weak exclusives. Sony invests a lot into many risky titles and seem very willing to give studios enough rope to hang themselves even, and as such you get a lot of variety in games (genre, style, scope, etc) on Sony systems you just won't get elsewhere. The Order, Gravity Rush, Tokyo Jungle, The Last Guardian, Journey, Heavy Rain, Little Big Planet, The Tomorrow Children and many more could only exist on a Sony system. I can't imagine any other company putting the time and money into these types of titles, and there will be hits and there will be misses. The hard part for many to come to grasp is that these games do not have to appeal to everyone, nor do I think that is the goal, each could sell anywhere from a million to 3 million units and be deemed a success. Twisted Metal PS3 broke even for crying out loud. So The Order is going to draw it's fair share of criticism for sure and it may not be a critical darling, but so long as it can find an audience on the PS4 it will be fine. To me that's the beauty of the year 2015 is shaping up for the PS4, there may not be an exclusive that speaks to every owner like Halo or Mario, but there will be a myriad of titles that will appeal to different people, starting with The Order.
So just accept that folks won't like this game, even without giving it a proper chance, because there will be 10 more titles coming to PS4 that may be their fancy instead.
Those super risky cinematic third person shooters.To me The Order exemplifies what I love about Sony consoles and why the general census, especially in the press, feels Sony has weak exclusives. Sony invests a lot into many risky titles and seem very willing to give studios enough rope to hang themselves even, and as such you get a lot of variety in games (genre, style, scope, etc) on Sony systems you just won't get elsewhere. The Order, Gravity Rush, Tokyo Jungle, The Last Guardian, Journey, Heavy Rain, Little Big Planet, The Tomorrow Children and many more could only exist on a Sony system. I can't imagine any other company putting the time and money into these types of titles, and there will be hits and there will be misses. The hard part for many to come to grasp is that these games do not have to appeal to everyone, nor do I think that is the goal, each could sell anywhere from a million to 3 million units and be deemed a success. Twisted Metal PS3 broke even for crying out loud. So The Order is going to draw it's fair share of criticism for sure and it may not be a critical darling, but so long as it can find an audience on the PS4 it will be fine. To me that's the beauty of the year 2015 is shaping up for the PS4, there may not be an exclusive that speaks to every owner like Halo or Mario, but there will be a myriad of titles that will appeal to different people, starting with The Order.
So just accept that folks won't like this game, even without giving it a proper chance, because there will be 10 more titles coming to PS4 that may be their fancy instead.
What on Earth is risky about a cover-based TPS with stealth sections, chases, and QTEs?
Those super risky cinematic third person shooters.
So every TPS is safe now? There were people that were calling The Last of Us a giant risk a week from release, including people in the press.
There is little safe about The Order. It is a period drama, with never been done before cinematic camera work and fidelity that rivals anything on the market (so budget is likely high). It lacks co op, MP, and it is a 8-10 linear game. It is the antithesis of what current gaming press wants, and that is fine by me.
I'm convinced that if this does well, they already have a trilogy scoped out for this thing just by changing the year in the title.
The Order: 1886
The Order: 1986
The Order: 2086 . . . in spaaaaaaace!!!!
Don't know how you came to that conclusion when the post mentioned nothing about giving studios creative freedom.I think the point is more that they let the studio do what they want and exercise their creative freedom. That being sort of the opposite of one of their largest competitors.
A singleplayer focussed, 8-10 hour, linear game, that's highly cinematic, and has great graphics.
And you don't think there's anything safe about it.
I wonder if it's a culture thing - to me it fits perfectly. It's a jarring juxtaposition to the on-screen action, and in all honesty (being UK based), although some have rightly pointed out that it specifically references the Nativity, the majority of the country are quite secular - to us it's really just a childhood Christmas song. If you get me.
Obviously I don't speak for the entirety of the UK*.
*yet
Don't know how you came to that conclusion when the post mentioned nothing about giving studios creative freedom.
The implied was my own deduction, but as much can be made from this statement if we're specifically talking about the post. I think it's fair to say Sony does not direct or micro-manage to a degree that restricts a studio's creative freedom like say, Microsoft with RARE.Sony invests a lot into many risky titles and seem very willing to give studios enough rope to hang themselves even
Going off this message board and the press what you just listed is exactly what most people don't want in a game, aside from great graphics of course. So yes, that combined with it being an only SP game not just SP focused, makes this a risky game to develop. I feel like I am in Bizarro world, where all of sudden some people on GAF find cinematic SP only games the fad of the industry.
The implied was my own deduction, but as much can be made from this statement if we're specifically talking about the post. I think it's fair to say Sony does not direct or micro-manage to a degree that restricts a studio's creative freedom like say, Microsoft with RARE.
I think the reason a lot of people in GAF and the enthusiast press 'don't want' a game like that is that we've played so many of them recently that the genre is feeling stale; not because we've played so few that none of us are fans.
I mean I agree with your point more generally. Sony provide a broader range of games than MS.
But using The Order as the example? The only game in their portfolio that would have been worse for making this point is KillZone.
I just don't get what is safe about The Order. Haven't people had bomba written all over this for ages? It's too cinematic, corridor shooter, linear, no MP or Co Op, black bars ugh, etc etc. Now all of sudden it is a safe title? Feel like it is the only game of it's ilk coming out next year.
Make it look like Blood DragonThe Order 1986 would be glorious if RAD did it dripping in Neon.
.
Make it look like Blood Dragon