clay_ghost
Member
Age of Ultron Age of Ultron Age of Ultron
JJ Abrams already made 2 good Star Wars films and called them Start Trek by mistake. It'll be decent to good quality.
Star Wars or Star Trek, it's a stretch to call Into Darkness a good film.
Star Wars or Star Trek, it's a stretch to call Into Darkness a good film.
We livin in the Marvel age.
People underestimating that Star Wars draw. Star Wars hasn't had a new film in almost 10 years, and the new film happens to be a direct sequel to one of the most highly recognized trilogy's of all time. It's going to draw in old fans, young kids, current fans, and all walks of life who want to say that they "saw it."
![]()
2008 wasn't ten years ago.
Which will come to an end once Force Awakens
Which will come to an end once Force Awakens
Star wars doesn't have a global presence like marvel superhero movies. Avengers is going to do some crazy numbers.Which will come to an end once Force Awakens
Star wars doesn't have a global presence like marvel superhero movies. .
Avengers has a bunch of great movies preceding it to hype it up.
Star Wars had three shit movies before it from a decade ago.
Episode III was preceded by two awful Star Wars movies, and it still made 850 million in 2005 (well over a billion adjusted for inflation).
Episode III was a sequel to the poorly received Attack of the Clone and The Phantom Menace and is a billion dollar level film. The Force Awakens is a sequel to Return of the Jedi with the return of Han, Luke, and Leia.
If Episode III did a billon+ worth of ticket sales...then The Force Awakens is looking at 1.5 bil, minimum.
Yea I'll say the only other movies that will even touch those 2 will be Jurassic World and the dark horse Fast 7
A part of me really wants to say Star Wars, but JJ Abrams couldn't save Star Trek so what does that bode for modern science fiction films, with GotG being the exception of course? I love science fiction, but I think modern audiences are more likely to favor Age of Ultron and other superhero films.
Wow such logic.
Avengers made a billion so Avengers 2 will make 2 billion, amirite?
Whoever wins... Disney also wins.
This has been annoying me for a while. It's Furious 7, not Fast 7. It's not just you, but it is a pet peeveYea I'll say the only other movies that will even touch those 2 will be Jurassic World and the dark horse Fast 7
and even then, the drop off in payout will be huge before those 2 are even close
Might as well write this down so I can brag or eat crow in January 2016.
Box-office: Avengers ($1.4 billion) > Star Wars ($1.2 billion)
Review scores: Star Wars > Avengers
The Force AwakensWhich movie do you think will make the most money?
Age of UltronWhich movie do you think will be the better film?
I'd have to flip a coin D:If they were both released on the same day, which would you go see first?
The final Hunger Games movie is releasing next year and that one is very likely breaking $1B, but I don't expect it to be "close" (I can see both TFA and AoU sailing past $1.5B)Do you think there is any other 2015 film that will remotely come close to the money these will make? Or maybe even a video game?
I don't really care much for KHWhich are you more excited about being in Kingdom Hearts?
The point is even with awful films with characters no one likes Star Wars baseline is 1 billion. This on the other-hand has a lot more well liked characters and setting.
Which movie do you think will make the most money?
Which movie do you think will be the better film?
If they were both released on the same day, which would you go see first?
Do you think there is any other 2015 film that will remotely come close to the money these will make? Or maybe even a video game?
Which are you more excited about being in Kingdom Hearts?
Well, I guess the real winner is Disney.
When did Star Wars make 1 billion? That's right, never.