I'm curious about what isn't possible at 60fps except for better graphics and effects.Not when you are getting other things that wouldn't be possible at 60.
I really hope ND ignores this Gaf 60 fps crowd and go for stable 30 with better graphics.
People really shouldn't be surprised.
How is this a surprise? It's been quite clear this (outside of the WiiU) is a console generation of 30fps games at best for the most part.
Why? What console game looks better?
I can't believe some people act like a 30fps game is unplayable.
I have a feeling at this point, though, that a visible downgrade on their "graphical flagship" series would be a pretty serious PR blow.
I can't believe some people act like a 30fps game is unplayable.
Its sad that in this day and age developers are not allowed to make a game they want to make. So ND may have targetted 60fps and now it seems they not entirely sure which way they will be going. As long as the game is at a stable framerate (locked 30 or 60) and not bug ridden, it should not be an issue at what res or framerate (locked 30fps obviously being the bare minimum) they launch at.
Its sad that in this day and age developers are not allowed to make a game they want to make. So ND may have targetted 60fps and now it seems they not entirely sure which way they will be going. As long as the game is at a stable framerate (locked 30 or 60) and not bug ridden, it should not be an issue at what res or framerate (locked 30fps obviously being the bare minimum) they launch at.
Oh I have and loved it. Like I said I'm not doubting Kojima just saying MGSV isn't out yet.
You're going to buy this game whether locked at 30fps or not.
Hmm... this is a good point. They should design the visual fidelity of the game for a solid 30FPS then try to optimise it to get 60FPS and maybe even add or improve some effects. And after watching the PSX demo, no way in Hell do I want a smaller map!I just hope they're designing with 30 fps in mind and then try to optimize it to 60. Would suck if they are designing it the other way and end up having to lock it at 30. We would possibly get a smaller scale game as a result.
MGSV.
Hm, doesn't sound very optimistic.
They probably shouldn't have teased the 60fps before they were sure if they're really going for it.
I'm curious about what isn't possible at 60fps except for better graphics and effects.
No. The average gamer doesn't care for framerate. Visual flair is what appeals. Only the hardcore care for the numbers. Flagship title is always going to go for visual flair given it has to showcase what the console can do. Locked 30fps is pefectly acceptable. I don't get where this "60fps or bust" talk is coming from. Developers are allowed to adjust to what they want to achieve. Be it visuals over framerate or vise versa.But wouldn't a downgrade to 30 fps also be a pretty serious PR blow?
They teased it?
If this is the best you got I am going to be sitting pretty.
But wouldn't a downgrade to 30 fps also be a pretty serious PR blow?
Hmm... this is a good point. They should design the visual fidelity of the game for a solid 30FPS then try to optimise it to get 60FPS and maybe even add or improve some effects. And after watching the PSX demo, no way in Hell do I want a smaller map!
There are people, real life people who believed this would be 60fps?
Come on now....
Set pieces are what define the Uncharted series and I have faith Naughty Dog will not compromise them for frame rateNot only that, but also spectacle. It would be shame if they dial set-pieces down because they want to aim for 60 FPS and don't reach it at the end.
It is, GZ is V. Additionally, they still work on the engine. If anything TPP will be better than GZ.
But wouldn't a downgrade to 30 fps also be a pretty serious PR blow?
GAF is a wonderful place like that. People here actually said TLOU on PS3 was a slideshow and was unplayable.I can't believe some people act like a 30fps game is unplayable.
it's almost as if Naughty Dog themselves said the game would be targeting 60fps and people believed them
weird right?
My comment was aimed at the "60fps or bust" crowd. The die hard 60fps crowd. 30fps locked is the bare minimum in terms of performance and playability. Anything below that is obviously not going to be something anyone would enjoy. They should be allowed to make what they want above locked 30fps.Make up your mind. You say they are not allowed to make a game they want, then you impose restrictions. What if they don't care if its 30 FPS locked and don't mind dips? Its still the game they want. What if its above 30 unlocked?
Are they allowed to make what they want or not?
I, for one, am shocked that the initial reveal trailer and the PR surrounding it from naughty dog was a lie.
And the point is, which of those features are more important than 60fps? You're gonna have diverging opinions on it, but personally i'd take 60 fps over hair that gets wet or a moving shirt that, as cool as it is, i won't see and forget about while i'm actually playing the game.
Great stuff to post as gif on forum console wars, but beyond that, i wouldn't prioritize it over something (like 60fps) that actively helps responsiveness and fluidity.
it's almost as if Naughty Dog themselves said the game would be targeting 60fps and people believed them
weird right?
No one gives a shit past concern trolls on GAF and PC master race people.
Sure we would all love to have it in 60fps, but practically no one truly expected itor would consider 30fps a "serious blow".
You're nuts if you think Neo Gaf is the only place that cares about 60 fps.
That's what I'd like to know too (grabs popcorn)Bit bold of you, care to explain how it was a lie?
Ya if that was the case noone would of bought most every game in the last yrYou're nuts if you think Neo Gaf is the only place that cares about 60 fps.
How is this a surprise? It's been quite clear this (outside of the WiiU) is a console generation of 30fps games at best for the most part.
37 to 60 doesn't sound like it's gonna happen. Need that shit well over 60 for a lock.