• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Edge cover revealed: Bloodborne, the verdict (review available tomorrow)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Click bait from Edge?

Get real guys

No hype. For all we know the game could end up like The Order 1886.

gtfo-eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3-428.gif
 
That's a fantastic cover.

As for the review.

8.

A solid follow up to Demon's and Dark Soils, but fails to fully capitalise on being a new IP. Doesn't take enough risks, doesn't do enough to differentiate itself from past games, the new gun mechanic, while sounding like a revolution, actually turns out to be a failure in its execution.

Bloodbourne ultimately fails to capture what made Demon's and Dark such good games.
 
Recent review not-embargoes might have ruined it, but usually games would get reviews a week before they're out. A couple of weeks doesn't seem that far-fetched especially for a print magazine compared to an online outlet. We'll see tomorrow though, whether it's a full-blown review.

I know, it's just that these days most devs and publishers seem to favor protecting their products more than getting out reviews early. Back in the day, when the digital age was relatively young, it was important to get reviews of the final product as fast as possible, in order to make the biggest sales when the game came out. Now a days, where word travels in a millisecond, reviews are less so important, especially since a negative one, especially one that is the only singular review for the product, can ricochet across the crevices of twitter or even NeoGAF. These days, to release a review early(Especially since Edge is announcing it, and if true the review will be available later today/tomorrow) is risky not knowing the outcome, especially giving consumers enough time to parse through it and decide to cancel it.

So...yeah it's peculiar and odd for the review of Bloodborne, a very much anticipated game to be coming out so early.
 
Expecting a 6.5 for the notoriety.

Probably going to be dinging it for a bunch of things it isn't rather than what it is. Not open world, not RPG enough, not enough player choice, pace of combat is not fast enough, etc. etc.
 
It'll be a 9 or 10.
If they gave Dark Souls II, which was developped by a B-team, they can't go lower with that one.

When you say B-team do you say this as if to say "the less talented developers"? I doubt very much they'd refer to them as the "B-team" and it comes off as insulting to see this rhetoric put forward regularly as if Dark Souls 2 was some shameful production.

Why don't you just refer to them as the DS team, or BB teams? Let them stand on their own merits, not artificial, arbitrary ones such as A/B.
 
I like all the underrating in this thread that's being given to the game. It will make that 9/10 all the more enjoyable ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°
 
£fivefifty

Presumably the review is 10/10 or it wouldn't really warrant this kind of cover. I can't think of many Edge covers which have been dedicated to reviews rather than previews/features.

Or they know they have the first BB review which will get them a lot of attention, and there aren't that many already announced that would make for interesting previews at this time.
 
Expecting a 6.5 for the notoriety.

Probably going to be dinging it for a bunch of things it isn't rather than what it is. Not open world, not RPG enough, not enough player choice, pace of combat is not fast enough, etc. etc.

I take it you've never read Edge? :)

It it's a good game, it'll get a good score. And Dark Souls was their game of the generation.
 
I like all the underrating in this thread that's being given to the game. It will make that 9/10 all the more enjoyable ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°

Pretty much every PS retail exclusive has rated below or at average, with the one exception of Naughty Dog games. I don't see that changing. For whatever reason reviewer's tastes just don't match with Sony's tastes on the games they decide to fund.
 
If it is a full review it'll be the first copy of Edge I've bought in around a year. I do like it when a developer has the balls to let reviews out this early. It shows they have supreme confidence in their product and it's normally justified.

I predict a 10/10.
 
Expecting a 6.5 for the notoriety.

Probably going to be dinging it for a bunch of things it isn't rather than what it is. Not open world, not RPG enough, not enough player choice, pace of combat is not fast enough, etc. etc.

What makes you think that?

Edit:

Pretty much every PS retail exclusive has rated below or at average, with the one exception of Naughty Dog games. I don't see that changing. For whatever reason reviewer's the just don't match with Sony's tastes on the games they decide to fund.

Ahh, an anti-Sony conspiracy. I see. You realise that they have far better reviews on average than the competition on Metacritic, right?
 
What is this influx of people suddenly assigning low score to Bloodborne? Did Dark Souls and Demon's Souls ceasing to exist because of The Order 1886?
 
Pretty much every PS retail exclusive has rated below or at average, with the one exception of Naughty Dog games. I don't see that changing. For whatever reason reviewer's tastes just don't match with Sony's tastes on the games they decide to fund.

Eh.
 
Does every fucking thread have to become a the order thread these days?

Give it a rest.

When a game is more disproportionate and conflicted than ever before between what pulls you in (stunning visuals and production values) and what gives you a satisfying gaming experience (innovation, content, variety) like The Order is, it's always going to invite passionate feelings, from people who have played the game and people who haven't.

You should get used to it, because it's not going to end for a while.
 
The hate DS 2 gets is ridicolous.

About BB i think it will be more or less on par with other Souls game. I fear for the quantity and variety of game content though.
 
score = 6/10
since you create your character, and it is anonymous...I had to give my character the name "Fight" just so I could recognize what she should do in battle.
 
That's a fantastic cover.

As for the review.

8.

A solid follow up to Demon's and Dark Soils, but fails to fully capitalise on being a new IP. Doesn't take enough risks, doesn't do enough to differentiate itself from past games, the new gun mechanic, while sounding like a revolution, actually turns out to be a failure in its execution.

Bloodbourne ultimately fails to capture what made Demon's and Dark such good games.

Have faith in Miyazaki.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom