Oh wow, you were being serious.
Yes. There is a difference between a game not being to ones liking, or having issues, and being bargain bin quality. M
The order is Amazing on a technical level, has extremely solid gunplay, fantastic sound design, a gripping story, solid presentation, inventive weapon/gadget designs, and wonderful Art.
Does it have some pacing issues? For many, yes.
Does it have the best AI? No. It's just serviceable.
Could it use more of the later style firefights in the first half of the game? Yes.
Probably a few other issues as well.
Do any of these things make it a 3/10 game? No.
Just as I hated everything about Final Fantasy VII, but I can see its merits through my hatred, and realize it is not actually a 3/10 game. A professional reviewer should be able to make the same distinction of they want to be credible in my eyes.
The game may "too cinimatic" or have "too many QTEs" for a reviewers liking, and that can drop a games score lower for certain. But the Order Executes what it sets out to do for the most part very well..
In any case I think the numbered review scale needs to go in favor of text only reviews... In part because of stuff like this. Rating games super high or low for clicks.
Tell us about the game. What you liked, what you didn't, what worked, what didn't.